RSSI-Based Indoor Localization With the Internet of Things
TL;DR: Four wireless technologies for indoor localization: Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11n-2009 at the 2.4 GHz band), Bluetooth low energy, Zigbee, and long-range wide-area network are compared in terms of localization accuracy and power consumption when IoT devices are used.
Abstract: In the era of smart cities, there are a plethora of applications where the localization of indoor environments is important, from monitoring and tracking in smart buildings to proximity marketing and advertising in shopping malls. The success of these applications is based on the development of a cost-efficient and robust real-time system capable of accurately localizing objects. In most outdoor localization systems, global positioning system (GPS) is used due to its ease of implementation and accuracy up to five meters. However, due to the limited space that comes with performing localization of indoor environments and the large number of obstacles found indoors, GPS is not a suitable option. Hence, accurately and efficiently locating objects is a major challenge in indoor environments. Recent advancements in the Internet of Things (IoT) along with novel wireless technologies can alleviate the problem. Small-size and cost-efficient IoT devices which use wireless protocols can provide an attractive solution. In this paper, we compare four wireless technologies for indoor localization: Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11n-2009 at the 2.4 GHz band), Bluetooth low energy, Zigbee, and long-range wide-area network. These technologies are compared in terms of localization accuracy and power consumption when IoT devices are used. The received signal strength indicator (RSSI) values from each modality were used and trilateration was performed for localization. The RSSI data set is available online. The experimental results can be used as an indicator in the selection of a wireless technology for an indoor localization system following application requirements.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: The geometric representation and the analytical solution of the model of the PGD technique, based only on measuring the received signal strength with multiple sensors deployed in the area of interest, has the potential to be a simple and effective solution to the 3D localization problem.
Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new approach to passively locate the 3D position of a signal source. This novel technique, called the power gain difference (PGD), is based only on measuring the received signal strength (RSS) with multiple sensors deployed in the area of interest, while the target transmit power or the equivalent isotropic radiated power (EIRP) is assumed to be unknown. Next, the signal source position is estimated using the knowledge of the ratios of RSS measured on different sensors. First, this article presents the geometric representation and the analytical solution of the model of the PGD technique. Second, the PGD dilution of precision was analyzed in order to gauge the accuracy of measuring the RSS. Finally, a numerical simulation of the performance of the proposed method was carried out and the results are discussed. It seems that the PGD technique has the potential to be a simple and effective solution of the 3D localization problem.
4 citations
TL;DR: The experimental results based on large-scale data collected in a complex building indicate a substantial performance gain of the proposed approach in comparison to state-of-the-art methods.
Abstract: This paper presents a nonlinear location estimation to infer the position of a user holding a smartphone. We consider a large location with $M$ M $N$ N
4 citations
TL;DR: In this article , the authors proposed a 2-phase cell localization algorithm based on trilateration, where the first phase finds the path loss exponent for each anchor node using RSSIs and the second phase divides the available space into virtual cells and finds the location of the cell in which the object is present.
Abstract: Exact location of an object is not required in some scenarios of indoor localization and all we need to know is the area or a cell where the object is present in a room or a hall. For instance, the object to be located is large and we are interested in knowing the locations of the cell in which the object lies, or we want to find the quadrant of a room in which the object of interest lies. For such cases, in this paper, we propose a novel 2-phase cell localization algorithm based on trilateration. In the first phase we find the path loss exponent for each anchor node using RSSIs and in second phase we divide the available space into virtual cells and find the location of the cell in which the object is present. We have conducted real testbed experiments using Wi-Fi and LoRa with different transmission powers and calculated the error. Results show that the proposed algorithm successfully performs cell localization and Wi-Fi based localization is better than that of LoRa. Moreover, we have also studied how the accuracy of localization is affected by cell size in both of the wireless protocol.
4 citations
01 Oct 2019
TL;DR: A probabilistic Gaussian mixture model of the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) is proposed to perform indoor localization via Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) sensors to deal with the fact that RSSI-based solutions are prone to drastic fluctuations.
Abstract: A probabilistic Gaussian mixture model (GMM) of the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) is proposed to perform indoor localization via Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) sensors. More specifically, to deal with the fact that RSSI-based solutions are prone to drastic fluctuations, GMMs are trained to more accurately represent the underlying distribution of the RSSI values. For assigning real-time observed RSSI vectors to different zones, first a Kalman Filter is applied to smooth the RSSI vector and form its Gaussian model, which is then compared in distribution with learned GMMs based on Bhattacharyya distance (BD) and via a weighted K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) approach.
4 citations
07 Jul 2021
TL;DR: An energy-efficient end device localization model based on LoRa Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) is developed using Random Neural Networks (RNN).
Abstract: The concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) has led to the interconnection of a significant number of devices and has impacted several applications in smart cities’ development. Localization is widely done using Global Positioning System (GPS). However, with large scale wireless sensor networks, GPS is limited by its high-power consumption and more hardware cost required. An energy-efficient localization system of wireless sensor nodes, especially in outdoor urban environments, is a research challenge with limited investigation. In this paper, an energy-efficient end device localization model based on LoRa Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) is developed using Random Neural Networks (RNN). Various RNN architectures are used to evaluate the proposed model’s performance by applying different learning rates on real RSSI LoRa measurements collected in the urban area of Glasgow City. The proposed model is used to predict the 2D Cartesian position coordinates with a minimum mean localization error of 0.39 m.
4 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: This paper will present and discuss the technical solutions and best-practice guidelines adopted in the Padova Smart City project, a proof-of-concept deployment of an IoT island in the city of Padova, Italy, performed in collaboration with the city municipality.
Abstract: The Internet of Things (IoT) shall be able to incorporate transparently and seamlessly a large number of different and heterogeneous end systems, while providing open access to selected subsets of data for the development of a plethora of digital services. Building a general architecture for the IoT is hence a very complex task, mainly because of the extremely large variety of devices, link layer technologies, and services that may be involved in such a system. In this paper, we focus specifically to an urban IoT system that, while still being quite a broad category, are characterized by their specific application domain. Urban IoTs, in fact, are designed to support the Smart City vision, which aims at exploiting the most advanced communication technologies to support added-value services for the administration of the city and for the citizens. This paper hence provides a comprehensive survey of the enabling technologies, protocols, and architecture for an urban IoT. Furthermore, the paper will present and discuss the technical solutions and best-practice guidelines adopted in the Padova Smart City project, a proof-of-concept deployment of an IoT island in the city of Padova, Italy, performed in collaboration with the city municipality.
4,335 citations
"RSSI-Based Indoor Localization With..." refers background in this paper
...These devices are capable of communicating with the IoT to allow for smart buildings to poses a greater amount of control that could never have been achieved before [1], [2]....
[...]
01 Nov 2007
TL;DR: Comprehensive performance comparisons including accuracy, precision, complexity, scalability, robustness, and cost are presented.
Abstract: Wireless indoor positioning systems have become very popular in recent years. These systems have been successfully used in many applications such as asset tracking and inventory management. This paper provides an overview of the existing wireless indoor positioning solutions and attempts to classify different techniques and systems. Three typical location estimation schemes of triangulation, scene analysis, and proximity are analyzed. We also discuss location fingerprinting in detail since it is used in most current system or solutions. We then examine a set of properties by which location systems are evaluated, and apply this evaluation method to survey a number of existing systems. Comprehensive performance comparisons including accuracy, precision, complexity, scalability, robustness, and cost are presented.
4,123 citations
"RSSI-Based Indoor Localization With..." refers background or methods in this paper
...AoA systems use an array of antennae to determine the angle, from which the signal propagated [8], [19], [20]....
[...]
...The most common technologies are: WiFi, Bluetooth, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), Ultra-Wide Band (UWB) and cellular [8]....
[...]
...So far, a standard model for indoor localization has not been developed due to obstacles, floor layouts, and reflections of signals that can occur [8]....
[...]
...other methods need to be used in order to determine a device’s location [8]–[10]....
[...]
...For instance, there are many more obstacles indoors, including furniture, walls, and people, which can reflect the signals produced, increasing multipath effects [7], [8], [15]....
[...]
TL;DR: The authors introduce a hierarchy of architectures with increasing levels of real-world awareness and interactivity for smart objects, describing activity-, policy-, and process-aware smart objects and demonstrating how the respective architectural abstractions support increasingly complex application.
Abstract: The combination of the Internet and emerging technologies such as nearfield communications, real-time localization, and embedded sensors lets us transform everyday objects into smart objects that can understand and react to their environment. Such objects are building blocks for the Internet of Things and enable novel computing applications. As a step toward design and architectural principles for smart objects, the authors introduce a hierarchy of architectures with increasing levels of real-world awareness and interactivity. In particular, they describe activity-, policy-, and process-aware smart objects and demonstrate how the respective architectural abstractions support increasingly complex application.
1,459 citations
"RSSI-Based Indoor Localization With..." refers background in this paper
...These devices are capable of communicating with the IoT to allow for smart buildings to poses a greater amount of control that could never have been achieved before [1], [2]....
[...]
TL;DR: This paper aims to provide a detailed survey of different indoor localization techniques, such as angle of arrival (AoA), time of flight (ToF), return time ofFlight (RTOF), and received signal strength (RSS) based on technologies that have been proposed in the literature.
Abstract: Indoor localization has recently witnessed an increase in interest, due to the potential wide range of services it can provide by leveraging Internet of Things (IoT), and ubiquitous connectivity. Different techniques, wireless technologies and mechanisms have been proposed in the literature to provide indoor localization services in order to improve the services provided to the users. However, there is a lack of an up-to-date survey paper that incorporates some of the recently proposed accurate and reliable localization systems. In this paper, we aim to provide a detailed survey of different indoor localization techniques, such as angle of arrival (AoA), time of flight (ToF), return time of flight (RTOF), and received signal strength (RSS); based on technologies, such as WiFi, radio frequency identification device (RFID), ultra wideband (UWB), Bluetooth, and systems that have been proposed in the literature. This paper primarily discusses localization and positioning of human users and their devices. We highlight the strengths of the existing systems proposed in the literature. In contrast with the existing surveys, we also evaluate different systems from the perspective of energy efficiency, availability, cost, reception range, latency, scalability, and tracking accuracy. Rather than comparing the technologies or techniques, we compare the localization systems and summarize their working principle. We also discuss remaining challenges to accurate indoor localization.
1,447 citations
"RSSI-Based Indoor Localization With..." refers background in this paper
...to ToA in that it requires devices to have synchronized clocks, but it uses the signal propagation time to multiple receivers to find the absolute signal propagation time [20]....
[...]
...AoA systems use an array of antennae to determine the angle, from which the signal propagated [8], [19], [20]....
[...]
...Through the use of synchronized clocks, the signal propagation time between the transmitter and receiver can be determined [19], [20]....
[...]
TL;DR: This work provides a detailed study of BLE fingerprinting using 19 beacons distributed around a ~600 m2 testbed to position a consumer device, and investigates the choice of key parameters in a BLE positioning system, including beacon density, transmit power, and transmit frequency.
Abstract: The complexity of indoor radio propagation has resulted in location-awareness being derived from empirical fingerprinting techniques, where positioning is performed via a previously-constructed radio map, usually of WiFi signals. The recent introduction of the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) radio protocol provides new opportunities for indoor location. It supports portable battery-powered beacons that can be easily distributed at low cost, giving it distinct advantages over WiFi. However, its differing use of the radio band brings new challenges too. In this work, we provide a detailed study of BLE fingerprinting using 19 beacons distributed around a $\sim\! 600\ \mbox{m}^2$ testbed to position a consumer device. We demonstrate the high susceptibility of BLE to fast fading, show how to mitigate this, and quantify the true power cost of continuous BLE scanning. We further investigate the choice of key parameters in a BLE positioning system, including beacon density, transmit power, and transmit frequency. We also provide quantitative comparison with WiFi fingerprinting. Our results show advantages to the use of BLE beacons for positioning. For one-shot (push-to-fix) positioning we achieve $30\ \mbox{m}^2$ ), compared to $100\ \mbox{m}^2$ ) and < 8.5 m for an established WiFi network in the same area.
736 citations
"RSSI-Based Indoor Localization With..." refers background in this paper
...With the recent emergence of BLE and beacons, it has becomemore feasible to place inexpensive beacons around an environment than it is to rearrange existing hardware and use that for localization [17], [18]....
[...]