scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

Science of Science and Reflexivity

01 Jan 2004-
TL;DR: Bourdieu's "Science of Science and Reflexivity" as mentioned in this paper argues that science is in danger of becoming a handmaiden to biotechnology, medicine, genetic engineering, and military research that it risks falling under the control of industrial corporations that seek to exploit it for monopolies and profit.
Abstract: Over the last four decades, the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu produced one of the most imaginative and subtle bodies of social theory of the postwar era. When he died in 2002, he was considered to be a thinker on a par with Foucault, Barthes, and Lacan a public intellectual as influential to his generation as Sartre was to his. "Science of Science and Reflexivity" will be welcomed as a companion volume to Bourdieu's now seminal "An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology." In this posthumous work, Bourdieu declares that science is in danger of becoming a handmaiden to biotechnology, medicine, genetic engineering, and military research that it risks falling under the control of industrial corporations that seek to exploit it for monopolies and profit. Science thus endangered can become detrimental to mankind. The line between pure and applied science, therefore, must be subjected to intense theoretical scrutiny. Bourdieu's goals in "Science of Science and Reflexivity" are to identify the social conditions in which science develops in order to reclaim its objectivity and to rescue it from relativism and the forces that might exploit it. In the grand tradition of scientific reflections on science, Bourdieu provides a sociological analysis of the discipline as something capable of producing transhistorical truths; he presents an incisive critique of the main currents in the study of science throughout the past half century; and he offers a spirited defense of science against encroaching political and economic forces. A masterful summation of the principles underlying Bourdieu's oeuvre and a memoir of his own scientific journey, "Science of Science and Reflexivity" is a capstone to one of the most important and prodigious careers in the field of sociology."
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The author's goal in this article is to demarcate the methodologies of both ethnography and autoethnography and then to identify the advantages and disadvantages that might arise from undertaking multiple-method and/or mixed-method research that uses these approaches concurrently.
Abstract: Although mixed- and multiple-method research designs are currently gaining momentum and popularity, it is essential that researchers undertake a critical analysis of the process of mixing "mainstream" research designs with newer methods before commencing. In ethnography, not only are there multiple approaches to data collection, but each approach also spans the competing paradigms, thus making the term mainstream ambiguous because these mainstream techniques are reasonably different from one another. When critically appraising the combination of ethnography and autoethnography, researchers must evaluate paradigmatic philosophies and methods of inquiry for commensurability and delineate the advantages and disadvantages of combining methods as they relate to each paradigm. The author's goal in this article is to demarcate the methodologies of both ethnography and autoethnography and then to identify the (dis)advantages that might arise from undertaking multiple-method and/or mixed-method research that uses these approaches concurrently.

93 citations


Cites background from "Science of Science and Reflexivity"

  • ...Because of the subjective nature of postmodernism, exact definitions of traditional and autoethnography blur (Bourdieu, 2004; Giddings & Wood, 2004) and the epistemological stance of subjective and transactional knowledge creation mean that each method will ultimately construct different results....

    [...]

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue for a more systematic engagement with the work of Bourdieu by organizational scholars and emphasize the opportunity to develop cumulative research on domination within and between organizations.
Abstract: Over the last 30 years, there has been an increasing interest in organizational analysis for the work of Pierre Bourdieu. However, the consequent body of literature often lacks an integrated comprehension of Bourdieusian theory and therefore fails to fully exploit its potentialities. In this essay, we argue for a more systematic engagement with the work of Bourdieu by organizational scholars and emphasize the opportunity to develop cumulative research on domination within and between organizations. The means by which systems of domination are reproduced without conscious intention by agents is a central issue for Bourdieu and arguably the primary reason for the development of his theoretical framework. It is thus through the study of domination that one can acquire a panoramic vision of Bourdieusian concepts that have been otherwise too often tackled separately. Moreover, domination is also a key entry to the understanding of how social scientists produce their own knowledge and of their role as members of society. We emphasize that as scholars, we have a moral responsibility to be reflexive about our practice and the social worlds we study in order to ultimately use the knowledge we produce to inform and direct social progress.

91 citations


Cites background from "Science of Science and Reflexivity"

  • ...To avoid this, researchers must be able to become aware of the illusio and the doxa of the fi elds they investigate but also of that of their own scientifi c fi elds (Bourdieu, 1990a, 1988a, 2000, 2004a)....

    [...]

  • ...To this end, Bourdieu invites researchers to objectivize the subject of objectivation and engage in what he calls ‘participant objectivation’ (Bourdieu, 2000, 2003, 2004a, 2004b; Bourdieu and Wacquant, 1992)....

    [...]

  • ...The sociology of intellectuals brings to light the particular form of interest which is the interest in disinterestedness’ (Bourdieu, 2004a: 94)....

    [...]

  • ...…beliefs and self-evidences, its rituals and consecrations, its constraints as regards publication of fi ndings, its specifi c forms of censorship, not to mention the whole set of presuppositions inscribed in the collective history of the specialty (the academic unconscious)’ (Bourdieu, 2004a: 94)....

    [...]

  • ...It thus consists in an epistemological awareness (Bourdieu, 2004a; Wacquant, 1992) that researchers in the social sciences, sensitive as they are to social determinisms, must accept as an indispensable condition to scientifi c objectivity....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Despite repeated pleas for participatory and deliberative governance of environmental resources, there is still a predominance of technocratic values in environmental decision-making as mentioned in this paper, and this is not surprising.

90 citations


Cites background from "Science of Science and Reflexivity"

  • ...Bourdieu’s idea of “reflexive sociology” means that sociological inquiry is epistemologically enriching when social researchers point the methods of science towards themselves as participants in the relevant fields of practices under study (Bourdieu 2003; 2004)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors apply Bourdieu's field theory to music, but do so with a critical orientation, focusing on the fin de millenaire music style called glitch, a style characterized by sonic fragments of technological error.
Abstract: Bourdieu's cultural sociology has become increasingly attractive to sociologists of music looking to account for the complex interrelations between industry, institution and practice. There remains, however, a tendency in such work to reduce the complexity and scope of Bourdieu's ideas. This paper attempts to apply Bourdieu's field theory to music, but does so with a critical orientation. The focus of the paper is the fin de millenaire music style called glitch, a style characterized by sonic fragments of technological error. While we learn a lot about the social trajectories of glitch from greater sensitization to its position in a structured setting of socio-economic relations, it becomes difficult to account for the centrality of technological mediators to this contemporary style of music using Bourdieu's categories alone. The paper pursues the possibility of supplementing or combining a Bourdieusian approach with actor network theory.

89 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on the biomedical scientists' limited receptiveness, it can anticipate that the growth of the social sciences will continue to meet obstacles within the health research field in the near future in Canada.

85 citations