Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D
TL;DR: A short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), derived and tested for reliability and validity among a sample of well older adults in a large Health Maintenance Organization, showed good predictive accuracy when compared to the full-length 20-item version.
About: This article is published in American Journal of Preventive Medicine.The article was published on 1994-03-01. It has received 4021 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale & Mass screening.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: This scientific statement provides an overview of the evidence on vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia and provides evidence that subcortical forms of VCI with white matter hyperintensities and small deep infarcts are common and risk markers for VCI are the same as traditional risk factors for stroke.
Abstract: Background and Purpose—This scientific statement provides an overview of the evidence on vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment ...
2,731 citations
TL;DR: Inadequate health literacy may contribute to the disproportionate burden of diabetes-related problems among disadvantaged populations and efforts should focus on developing and evaluating interventions to improve diabetes outcomes among patients with inadequate health literacy.
Abstract: ContextHealth literacy is a measure of patients' ability to read, comprehend,
and act on medical instructions. Poor health literacy is common among racial
and ethnic minorities, elderly persons, and patients with chronic conditions,
particularly in public-sector settings. Little is known about the extent to
which health literacy affects clinical health outcomes.ObjectivesTo examine the association between health literacy and diabetes outcomes
among patients with type 2 diabetes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsCross-sectional observational study of 408 English- and Spanish-speaking
patients who were older than 30 years and had type 2 diabetes identified from
the clinical database of 2 primary care clinics of a university-affiliated
public hospital in San Francisco, Calif. Participants were enrolled and completed
questionnaires between June and December 2000. We assessed patients' health
literacy by using the short-form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults
(s-TOFHLA) in English or Spanish.Main Outcome MeasuresMost recent hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level. Patients
were classified as having tight glycemic control if their HbA1c
was in the lowest quartile and poor control if it was in the highest quartile.
We also measured the presence of self-reported diabetes complications.ResultsAfter adjusting for patients' sociodemographic characteristics, depressive
symptoms, social support, treatment regimen, and years with diabetes, for
each 1-point decrement in s-TOFHLA score, the HbA1c value increased
by 0.02 (P = .02). Patients with inadequate health
literacy were less likely than patients with adequate health literacy to achieve
tight glycemic control (HbA1c ≤7.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR],
0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.00; P
= .05) and were more likely to have poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥9.5%;
adjusted OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.11-3.73; P = .02) and
to report having retinopathy (adjusted OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.19-4.57; P = .01).ConclusionsAmong primary care patients with type 2 diabetes, inadequate health
literacy is independently associated with worse glycemic control and higher
rates of retinopathy. Inadequate health literacy may contribute to the disproportionate
burden of diabetes-related problems among disadvantaged populations. Efforts
should focus on developing and evaluating interventions to improve diabetes
outcomes among patients with inadequate health literacy.
1,732 citations
Additional excerpts
...Black 100 (25) 27 (17) 13 (24) 60 (30) ....
[...]
Baylor College of Medicine1, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences2, University of Kansas3, Oregon Health & Science University4, Duke University5, Veterans Health Administration6, University of California, San Diego7, Case Western Reserve University8, University of Pittsburgh9, University of California, Los Angeles10
TL;DR: Dementia criteria for dementia have improved since the 1994 practice parameter, and further research is needed to improve clinical definitions of dementia and its subtypes, as well as to determine the utility of various instruments of neuroimaging, biomarkers, and genetic testing in increasing diagnostic accuracy.
Abstract: Article abstract—Objective: To update the 1994 practice parameter for the diagnosis of dementia in the elderly. Background: The AAN previously published a practice parameter on dementia in 1994. New research and clinical developments warrant an update of some aspects of diagnosis. Methods: Studies published in English from 1985 through 1999 were identified that addressed four questions: 1) Are the current criteria for the diagnosis of dementia reliable? 2) Are the current diagnostic criteria able to establish a diagnosis for the prevalent dementias in the elderly? 3) Do laboratory tests improve the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of dementing illness? 4) What comorbidities should be evaluated in elderly patients undergoing an initial assessment for dementia? Recommendations: Based on evidence in the literature, the following recommendations are made. 1) The DSM-III-R definition of dementia is reliable and should be used (Guideline). 2) The National Institute of Neurologic, Communicative Disorders and Stroke‐AD and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 3rd edition, revised (DSM-IIIR) diagnostic criteria for AD and clinical criteria for Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (CJD) have sufficient reliability and validity and should be used (Guideline). Diagnostic criteria for vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia may be of use in clinical practice (Option) but have imperfect reliability and validity. 3) Structural neuroimaging with either a noncontrast CT or MR scan in the initial evaluation of patients with dementia is appropriate. Because of insufficient data on validity, no other imaging procedure is recommended (Guideline). There are currently no genetic markers recommended for routine diagnostic purposes (Guideline). The CSF 14-3-3 protein is useful for confirming or rejecting the diagnosis of CJD (Guideline). 4) Screening for depression, B12 deficiency, and hypothyroidism should be performed (Guideline). Screening for syphilis in patients with dementia is not justified unless clinical suspicion for neurosyphilis is present (Guideline). Conclusions: Diagnostic criteria for dementia have improved since the 1994 practice parameter. Further research is needed to improve clinical definitions of dementia and its subtypes, as well as to determine the utility of various instruments of neuroimaging, biomarkers, and genetic testing in increasing diagnostic accuracy.
1,662 citations
TL;DR: The test characteristics of a two-question case-fidning instrument that asks about depressed mood and anhedonia were compared with six common case-finding instruments, using the Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule as a criterion standard for the diagnosis of major depression.
Abstract: Objective
To determine the validity of a two-question case-finding instrument for depression as compared with six previously validated instruments.
1,555 citations
TL;DR: Aerobic exercise at a dose consistent with public health recommendations is an effective treatment for MDD of mild to moderate severity and a lower dose is comparable to placebo effect.
1,261 citations