Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci
Citations
46 citations
Cites background from "Selections from the prison notebook..."
...These structural changes maybe systemic (Gramsci, 1971)....
[...]
...The contestation of the narrative of the crisis can have significant implications (Gramsci, 1971; Klein, 2007, 2020; Mirowski, 2013)....
[...]
...Is the crisis a critical turning point (Gramsci, 1971, Habermas, 1975), or a catastrophe (Diamond, 2005), or is it stabilised and absorbed (Engelen et al., 2011; Minsky, 2008 [1986]), or will it cascade through further social systems (Haas, 1958; Perrow, 1999 [1984]; Walby, 2015)?...
[...]
46 citations
46 citations
Cites background from "Selections from the prison notebook..."
...…rights agenda as a ‘hegemonic process’ (Mallon, 1995) in which the law simultaneously serves as (i) a vehicle through which a ‘compromise equilibrium’ (Gramsci, 1998, p. 161) between social groups can be constructed in order to gain consent for a neoliberal development strategy; and (ii) a…...
[...]
...Given that these modalities are intended to maintain ‘unstable equilibria’ of compromise ‘in which the interest of the dominant social groups prevail’ (Gramsci, 1998, p. 182) it follows that one should ask what subaltern groups can and cannot expect to achieve by routing their resistance through…...
[...]
...But—secondly—the bill also exemplifies how the construction of such an equilibrium, and the many concessions notwithstanding, ‘cannot touch the essential’ and has to bolster ‘the decisive function exercised by the leading group in the decisive nucleus of economic activity’ (Gramsci, 1998, p. 161)....
[...]
...Consequently, the institutions, discourses, and technologies of rule that attach to the state also become sites of contention where subaltern resistance can be articulated and pursued (Gramsci, 1998, p. 52)....
[...]
...However, this process is a gradual and contentious one, which can only proceed through a continuous process of formation and superseding of ‘unstable equilibria . . . between the interests of the fundamental group and those of the subordinate groups’ (Gramsci, 1998, p. 182)....
[...]
46 citations
46 citations