Sensitivity of output performance measures to input distributions in queueing simulation modeling
Citations
131 citations
68 citations
Cites background from "Sensitivity of output performance m..."
...…system might seem restrictive, it is less so than it first appears: In many applications, simulation output performance measures are insensitive to the specific input distribution chosen, provided that enough moments of the distribution are correct (see, for instance, Gross and Juttijudata 1997)....
[...]
40 citations
32 citations
26 citations
References
7 citations
5 citations
4 citations
"Sensitivity of output performance m..." refers background in this paper
...…that have more than two parameters (e.g., Johnson translation distributions, phase-type distributions, Coxian distributions, generalized hyper exponential distributions), fitting can be a formidable task (see, for example, Johnson and Taffe, 1991, Johnson, 1993, and Harris and Marchal, 1997)....
[...]
4 citations
"Sensitivity of output performance m..." refers background in this paper
...Some general papers in this area include Fox (1981), Kelton (1984), Cheng (1993), Cheng, et al (1996), Leemis (1995, 1996) and Nelson et al (1995). Three rather “nonclassical” classes of distributions which appear to have potential in input modeling are the Johnson translation distributions (see Storer et al, 1988), Phase-type distributions (see Johnson and Taaffe, 1991), and Bezier distributions (see Wagner and Wilson, 1996)....
[...]
...Some general papers in this area include Fox (1981), Kelton (1984), Cheng (1993), Cheng, et al (1996), Leemis (1995, 1996) and Nelson et al (1995)....
[...]