Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis?
Citations
740 citations
Cites background from "Should evolutionary geneticists wor..."
...[703] Daniel M Weinreich, Yinghong Lan, C Scott Wylie, and Robert B Heckendorn....
[...]
...[703] have defined as “the surprise at the phenotype when mutations are combined, given the constituent mutations individual effects”....
[...]
608 citations
515 citations
453 citations
385 citations
References
[...]
3,272 citations
"Should evolutionary geneticists wor..." refers background in this paper
...Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2013, 23:700–707 Critically, such higher-order interactions cannot be captured by pairwise epistasis [6,7]....
[...]
2,225 citations
"Should evolutionary geneticists wor..." refers background in this paper
...For example, data on pairwise epistasis between gene deletions have provided insight into metabolic networks in yeast [8 ,9,10] and E....
[...]
1,387 citations
"Should evolutionary geneticists wor..." refers background in this paper
...The recognition of epistasis between pairs of mutations in both discrete, Mendelian [1] and continuous [2,3] traits goes back roughly 100 years, but recent experimental advances draw attention to interactions between more than two mutations....
[...]
1,319 citations
"Should evolutionary geneticists wor..." refers background in this paper
...Recently published analyses based on alignments of naturally occurring protein-coding sequences demonstrate that a great deal of evolutionary information is already present in pairwise epistasis [53,54 ,55]....
[...]
1,319 citations
Additional excerpts
...[14,15]], the evolutionary advantage of recombination [e....
[...]