Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences
Citations
348 citations
Cites background or result from "Some utterances are underinformativ..."
...Single sentence truth value judgment tasks by Noveck and Posada (2003); Bott and Noveck (2004) consistently support the Context-Driven view....
[...]
...Noveck and Posada (2003); Bott and Noveck (2004) asked subjects to perform a truth-value judgement task on sentences like (7): 7....
[...]
...Bott and Noveck (2004) replicated these findings in an experiment where an additional layer of narration is introduced....
[...]
...These findings corroborate the results obtained by Noveck and Posada (2003); Bott and Noveck (2004) through single-sentence truth value judgements tasks....
[...]
302 citations
Cites background from "Some utterances are underinformativ..."
...For example, Bott and Noveck (2004) examined the response times for truth-value judgments of sentences containing weak scalar quantifiers like ‘‘Some elephants are mammals.”...
[...]
...Second, the use of verification tasks creates uncertainty about whether the increases in reaction times are actually attributable to linguistic processes, rather than processes involved in verification (Bott & Noveck, 2004)....
[...]
287 citations
Cites background or result from "Some utterances are underinformativ..."
...This finding is in line with the participant distributions reported by Guasti et al. (2005) for children and Bott and Noveck (2004) for adults for the scalar expressions....
[...]
...(2005) for children and Bott and Noveck (2004) for adults for the scalar expressions....
[...]
238 citations
Cites background or methods from "Some utterances are underinformativ..."
...This would serve to explain the processing delays observed by Bott and Noveck (2004), Breheny et al. (2006) and Huang and Snedeker (2009)....
[...]
...This would serve to explain the processing delays observed by Bott and Noveck (2004), Breheny et al....
[...]
...…still be far sooner than either the ∼600ms delay that might be inferred from the difference in verification times to pragmatic and logical some (Bott & Noveck 2004, Experiments 1 & 3; Noveck & Prasada 2003) or the 800–1000ms delay in referent identification observed by Huang and Snedeker…...
[...]
...This would serve to explain the processing delays observed by Bott and Noveck (2004), Breheny et al. (2006) and Huang and Snedeker (2009). Pickering, McElree, Frisson, Chin and Traxler (2006) have made a similar proposal for processing difficulty associated with coercing the aspect of a semantic event....
[...]
References
16,594 citations
10,084 citations
7,579 citations
5,408 citations