scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services

TL;DR: This article presents a systematic approach to ecosystem service flow quantification as a class of agent-based models termed “Service Path Attribution Networks” (SPANs), developed as part of the Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES) project.
Abstract: Recent ecosystem services research has highlighted the importance of spatial connectivity between ecosystems and their beneficiaries. Despite this need, a systematic approach to ecosystem service flow quantification has not yet emerged. In this article, we present such an approach, which we formalize as a class of agent-based models termed “Service Path Attribution Networks” (SPANs). These models, developed as part of the Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES) project, expand on ecosystem services classification terminology introduced by other authors. Conceptual elements needed to support flow modeling include a service's rivalness, its flow routing type (e.g., through hydrologic or transportation networks, lines of sight, or other approaches), and whether the benefit is supplied by an ecosystem's provision of a beneficial flow to people or by absorption of a detrimental flow before it reaches them. We describe our implementation of the SPAN framework for five ecosystem services and discuss how to generalize the approach to additional services. SPAN model outputs include maps of ecosystem service provision, use, depletion, and flows under theoretical, possible, actual, inaccessible, and blocked conditions. We highlight how these different ecosystem service flow maps could be used to support various types of decision making for conservation and resource management planning.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Landscape sustainability is defined as the capacity of a landscape to consistently provide long-term, landscape-specific ecosystem services essential for maintaining and improving human well-being as discussed by the authors, which is a place-based, use-inspired science of understanding and improving the dynamic relationship between ecosystem services and human wellbeing in changing landscapes under uncertainties arising from internal feedbacks and external disturbances.
Abstract: The future of humanity depends on whether or not we have a vision to guide our transition toward sustainability, on scales ranging from local landscapes to the planet as a whole. Sustainability science is at the core of this vision, and landscapes and regions represent a pivotal scale domain. The main objectives of this paper are: (1) to elucidate key definitions and concepts of sustainability, including the Brundtland definition, the triple bottom line, weak and strong sustainability, resilience, human well-being, and ecosystem services; (2) to examine key definitions and concepts of landscape sustainability, including those derived from general concepts and those developed for specific landscapes; and (3) to propose a framework for developing a science of landscape sustainability. Landscape sustainability is defined as the capacity of a landscape to consistently provide long-term, landscape-specific ecosystem services essential for maintaining and improving human well-being. Fundamentally, well-being is a journey, not a destination. Landscape sustainability science is a place-based, use-inspired science of understanding and improving the dynamic relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes under uncertainties arising from internal feedbacks and external disturbances. While landscape sustainability science emphasizes place-based research on landscape and regional scales, significant between landscape interactions and hierarchical linkages to both finer and broader scales (or externalities) must not be ignored. To advance landscape sustainability science, spatially explicit methods are essential, especially experimental approaches that take advantage of designed landscapes and multi-scaled simulation models that couple the dynamics of landscape services (ecosystem services provided by multiple landscape elements in combination as emergent properties) and human well-being.

989 citations


Cites background or methods from "Spatial dynamics of ecosystem servi..."

  • ...…provide a spatial framework for mapping and quantifying the sources, sinks, and flows of ecosystem services in a heterogeneous landscape, as well as exploring and testing different landscape-based scenarios for sustainability planning and decision-making (Bagstad et al. 2012; Johnson et al. 2012)....

    [...]

  • ...New mapping and modeling methods have emerged to ‘‘spatialize’’ ecosystem services research (Bohnet et al. 2011; Kareiva et al. 2011; Koniak et al. 2011; Bagstad et al. 2012; Johnson et al. 2012; Verburg et al. 2012; Wu and Kim 2013)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This study describes 17 ecosystem services tools and rate their performance against eight evaluative criteria that gauge their readiness for widespread application in public- and private-sector decision making, and describes potential pathways forward to reduce the resource requirements for running ecosystem services models.
Abstract: To enter widespread use, ecosystem service assessments need to be quantifiable, replicable, credible, flexible, and affordable. With recent growth in the field of ecosystem services, a variety of decision-support tools has emerged to support more systematic ecosystem services assessment. Despite the growing complexity of the tool landscape, thorough reviews of tools for identifying, assessing, modeling and in some cases monetarily valuing ecosystem services have generally been lacking. In this study, we describe 17 ecosystem services tools and rate their performance against eight evaluative criteria that gauge their readiness for widespread application in public- and private-sector decision making. We describe each of the tools′ intended uses, services modeled, analytical approaches, data requirements, and outputs, as well time requirements to run seven tools in a first comparative concurrent application of multiple tools to a common location – the San Pedro River watershed in southeast Arizona, USA, and northern Sonora, Mexico. Based on this work, we offer conclusions about these tools′ current ‘readiness’ for widespread application within both public- and private-sector decision making processes. Finally, we describe potential pathways forward to reduce the resource requirements for running ecosystem services models, which are essential to facilitate their more widespread use in environmental decision making.

565 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ecoSERVICES project as discussed by the authors is a platform to foster global coordination of multidisciplinary sustainability science through the lens of ecosystem services, focusing on three key questions that will improve incorporation of ecosystem service research into decision-making for the sustainable use of natural resources to improve human well-being.

550 citations


Additional excerpts

  • ...Future scenarios can show possible trends in ecosystem services, the impact of new drivers and increased telecoupling in the global system and the related impacts on the well-being of future generations [51,63]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed.
Abstract: The high variety of ecosystem service categorisation systems, assessment frameworks, indicators, quantification methods and spatial localisation approaches allows scientists and decision makers to harness experience, data, methods and tools. On the other hand, this variety of concepts and disagreements among scientists hamper an integration of ecosystem services into contemporary environmental management and decision making. In this article, the current state of the art of ecosystem service science regarding spatial localisation, indication and quantification of multiple ecosystem service supply and demand is reviewed and discussed. Concepts and tables for regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem service definitions, distinguishing between ecosystem service potential supply (stocks), flows (real supply) and demands as well as related indicators for quantification are provided. Furthermore, spatial concepts of service providing units, benefitting areas, spatial relations, rivalry, spatial and temporal scales are elaborated. Finally, matrices linking CORINE land cover types to ecosystem service potentials, flows, demands and budget estimates are provided. The matrices show that ecosystem service potentials of landscapes differ from flows, especially for provisioning ecosystem services.

546 citations


Cites background from "Spatial dynamics of ecosystem servi..."

  • ...Flows of ecosystem goods and services from SPUs to SBAs can take place via service connecting areas (SCAs; Syrbe & Walz 2012) or certain ‘carriers’ (Bagstad et al. 2013b)....

    [...]

  • ...For most of them, spatial mismatches exist between the ecosystems that supply services and people that enjoy them (Bagstad et al. 2013b)....

    [...]

  • ...Ecosystem service flows were assessed for example in Bagstad et al. (2013b), Willemen et al. (2013) and Palomo et al. (2013)....

    [...]

  • ...Viewsheds can be lines of sight to connect view paths between source locations (e.g. aesthetic landscape features) and locations for human use (areas of potential enjoyment; Bagstad et al. 2013b)....

    [...]

  • ...Ecosystem service flows are the spatially explicit routing of an ecosystem service from sources to beneficiaries (Bagstad et al. 2013b)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a synthesis of common terminology and explain a rationale and framework for distinguishing among the components of ecosystem service delivery, including: an ecosystem's capacity to produce services; ecological pressures that interfere with the ecosystem's ability to provide the services; societal demand for the service; and flow of the service to people.

481 citations

References
More filters
Book
10 Oct 2016
TL;DR: In this paper, it is argued that the suggested courses of action are inappropriate, in that they lead to results which are not necessarily, or even usually, desirable, and therefore, it is recommended to exclude the factory from residential districts (and presumably from other areas in which the emission of smoke would have harmful effects on others).
Abstract: This paper is concerned with those actions of business firms which have harmful effects on others. The standard example is that of a factory the smoke from which has harmful effects on those occupying neighbouring properties. The economic analysis of such a situation has usually proceeded in terms of a divergence between the private and social product of the factory, in which economists have largely followed the treatment of Pigou in The Economics of Welfare. The conclusions to which this kind of analysis seems to have led most economists is that it would be desirable to make the owner of the factory liable for the damage caused to those injured by the smoke, or alternatively, to place a tax on the factory owner varying with the amount of smoke produced and equivalent in money terms to the damage it would cause, or finally, to exclude the factory from residential districts (and presumably from other areas in which the emission of smoke would have harmful effects on others). It is my contention that the suggested courses of action are inappropriate, in that they lead to results which are not necessarily, or even usually, desirable.

11,448 citations


"Spatial dynamics of ecosystem servi..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Treatment of ecosystem services in ecology and economics both date back to at least the 1960s (Coase, 1960; King, 1966; Krutilla, 1967; Helliwell, 1969), and while challenges remain in the underlying ecology and economics of ecosystem services, an even more basic set of geographic questions — ‘‘where are ecosystems producing benefits’’ and ‘‘who and where are people using ecosystem services’’ — too often remains unanswered in the field of ecosystem services....

    [...]

  • ...Treatment of ecosystem services in ecology and economics both date back to at least the 1960s (Coase, 1960; King, 1966; Krutilla, 1967; Helliwell, 1969), and while challenges remain in the underlying ecology and economics of ecosystem services, an even more basic set of geographic questions —…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The concept of ecosystem services has become an important model for linking the functioning of ecosystems to human welfare Understanding this link is critical for a wide-range of decision-making contexts.

2,679 citations


"Spatial dynamics of ecosystem servi..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Others described the difficulties presented by the ‘‘spatial mismatch’’ between the ecosystems that provide value and B.V. . people that enjoy services (Ruhl et al., 2007; Costanza, 2008; Fisher et al., 2009)....

    [...]

  • ...Ruhl et al. (2007) and Fisher et al. (2009) described patterns of transmission of a service from provision to benefit areas, reflecting the understanding that ecosystems and their beneficiaries are often not co-located....

    [...]

  • ...The flow routing of different ecosystem services to people (or of people to service provision locations) can be characterized with greater precision than earlier efforts (Costanza, 2008; Fisher et al., 2009) using a series of flow routing behaviors....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the term "ecosystem services" is too ad hoc to be of practical use in welfare accounting and propose a definition, rooted in economic principles, of ecosystem service units.
Abstract: This paper advocates consistently defined units of account to measure the contributions of nature to human welfare. We argue that such units have to date not been defined by environmental accounting advocates and that the term "ecosystem services" is too ad hoc to be of practical use in welfare accounting. We propose a definition, rooted in economic principles, of ecosystem service units. A goal of these units is comparability with the definition of conventional goods and services found in GDP and the other national accounts. We illustrate our definition of ecological units of account with concrete examples. We also argue that these same units of account provide an architecture for environmental performance measurement by governments, conservancies, and environmental markets.

1,758 citations


"Spatial dynamics of ecosystem servi..." refers background in this paper

  • ...The first is the identification of ecosystem service beneficiaries who benefit from ‘‘ecological endpoints’’ (Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007) or ‘‘final ecosystem goods and services’’ (Johnston and Russell, 2011)....

    [...]

  • ...Soon after its publication some argued that a stronger focus on the beneficiaries of ecosystem services was a prerequisite to deal with ‘‘double counting’’ of ecosystem service values (Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007; Wallace, 2007)....

    [...]

  • ...A beneficiary-based approach emphasizes identification of spatially explicit, concrete beneficiary groups for modeling and valuation (Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007; Fisher et al., 2008; HainesYoung and Potschin, 2010; Nahlik et al., 2012)....

    [...]

  • ...A beneficiaries-based approach has also been advocated to provide linkages to green accounting systems that incorporate the value of ecosystem services into mainstream macroeconomic measures like GDP (Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007; Haines-Young and Potschin, 2010; Nahlik et al., 2012)....

    [...]

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a conceptual framework and sketch out a strategic plan for delivering on the promise of ecosystem services, drawing on emerging examples from Hawai'i, and describe key advances in the science and practice of accounting for natural capital in the decisions of individuals, communities, corporations, and governments.
Abstract: Over the past decade, efforts to value and protect ecosystem services have been promoted by many as the last, best hope for making conservation mainstream - attractive and commonplace worldwide. In theory, if we can help individuals and institutions to recognize the value of nature, then this should greatly increase investments in conservation, while at the same time fostering human well-being. In practice, however, we have not yet developed the scientific basis, nor the policy and finance mechanisms, for incorporating natural capital into resource- and land-use decisions on a large scale. Here, we propose a conceptual framework and sketch out a strategic plan for delivering on the promise of ecosystem services, drawing on emerging examples from Hawai‘i. We describe key advances in the science and practice of accounting for natural capital in the decisions of individuals, communities, corporations, and governments.

1,666 citations


"Spatial dynamics of ecosystem servi..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Ecological production functions (Daily et al., 2009), increasingly used to quantify an ecosystem’s ability to provide social benefits, do not reflect the locations of beneficiaries or the spatial and temporal flow of services; as such, they only quantify in situ or theoretical service provision....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the term "ecosystem services" is too ad hoc to be of practical use in welfare accounting and propose a definition, rooted in economic principles, of final ecosystem service units.

1,545 citations