Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality
Citations
12 citations
12 citations
Cites background from "Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pl..."
...…rights, because ‘political power’ cannot ‘be exercised democratically without the ongoing consent of subjects’, and its subjects in fact include ‘every man and woman who lives within the territory over which those decisions are enforced’ (Walzer 1983, p. 58, also Rubio-Marin 2000, Bosniak 2006)....
[...]
...Long-term residents are de facto members, ‘men and women who resemble citizens in every respect that counts in the host country’ (Walzer 1983, p. 59, also Sassen 2003, p. 43); they should have access to the rights that come with full, and fully recognized, membership....
[...]
...…with regard to rights of political participation, deemed to mark out the boundaries of self-determining political communities perfectly entitled to exclude outsiders – in the form of nonresident non-citizens – from their political decision-making processes (Walzer 1983, pp. 62–63, Whelan 1983)....
[...]
...…people of a democracy incorporates ‘every man and woman who lives within the territory over which those decisions are enforced’, the foundational idea appears to be that in a modern democracy the people ought to include all those who are governed, not just some subset thereof (Walzer 1983, p. 58)....
[...]
12 citations
Cites background from "Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pl..."
...What would be the barriers to multination federalism, from the perspective of the Canada school? Given that, at least since the 1970s, Québécois nationalism has predominated among French-speaking Quebecers (Venne, 2000), there is an assumption that multination federalism would be accepted by them (although this assumption problematically ignores the possibility that there are panCanadianists in French-speaking Québec, which I discuss in the section ‘National minorities as zones of conflicts’)....
[...]
...Given that, at least since the 1970s, Québécois nationalism has predominated among French-speaking Quebecers (Venne, 2000), there is an assumption that multination federalism would be accepted by them (although this assumption problematically ignores the possibility that there are panCanadianists…...
[...]
11 citations
11 citations