Journal ArticleDOI
Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality
Norman Daniels,Michael Walzer +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Lawler as mentioned in this paper argued that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament, which is hardly a rational position in the sense that it is suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some.Abstract:
that a plurality of the American Catholic bishops endorse a nuclear freeze (p. 4), saying that they are thus "taking their stance with Moscow,55 which is for a freeze, and not with the Vatican, which "is still in favor of disarmament?not a freeze.55 To make any sense at all, Mr. Lawler must mean that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament? hardly a rational position. One recalls here the arguments, during the 19305s and 19405s, that being for racial justice in the United States was suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some, because the communists also favored it.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Unfinished agendas: acting upon minority voices of the past decade
TL;DR: In this article, the relevance of political philosophy is considered in relation to current discussion of universalism, difference and the local, as well as traditional geographical themes, such as migration and mobility, development, and inequality.
Dissertation
The Disclosures of Respect: The Public Exposure of Stasi Informers after the German Reunification.
Journal ArticleDOI
Liberalism, commodification, and justice
TL;DR: In this article, anti-commodification theorists condemn liberal political philosophers for not being able to justify restricting a market transaction on the basis of what is sold, but only on how it is sold.
Dissertation
Is a non-liberal value pluralism possible?:beyond Isaiah Berlin
Şamiloğlu Sezgin,Esma Nur +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, Öz et al. present a table of dedications for the year 2017, which includes the following categories: Dedication, Dedication and Dedication Table Of
Dissertation
Social freedom in a multicultural state : a normative theory of the politics of multicultural integration
TL;DR: The authors argues that social freedom is essentially "agency-freedom" - the notion of freedom as non-domination that is central to modem republicanism - which is tied to social justice, and that an assault on one's capability to participate as a citizen of equal status negatively affects one's social freedom.