Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality
Citations
59 citations
Cites background from "Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pl..."
...Indeed, Michael Walzer (1983) has suggested that membership in a political community is the first and most basic “good” that a political community can give or confer, and if we bracket the normative considerations implied there, we can see that from the individual’s point of view, this membership…...
[...]
...Indeed, Michael Walzer (1983) has suggested that membership in a political community is the first and most basic “good” that a political community can give or confer, and if we bracket the normative considerations implied there, we can see that from the individual’s point of view, this membership is the first thing to be sought from the state, because attaining it is a precondition for all other benefits....
[...]
58 citations
Additional excerpts
...Frances Kamm has suggested a different reason why giving priority to treating some patients, those in group A in the example above, because doing so will produce indirect non health benefits for third parties would be wrong – it would violate the Kantian requirement that persons always be treated as ends in themselves and never solely as means [1,8]....
[...]
...Direct Versus Indirect Benefits The separate sphere's argument has been used to somewhat different effect by different of its prominent proponents, such as Michael Walzer and Frances Kamm [1,4]....
[...]
...The Moral Significance of Separate Spheres and Direct Versus Indirect Benefits The separate sphere's argument has been used to somewhat different effect by different of its prominent proponents, such as Michael Walzer and Frances Kamm [1,4]....
[...]
58 citations
Cites background from "Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pl..."
...Habermas [37] (see also Walzer [38]) considered the influence of instrumental action upon the democratic potential of...
[...]
...Habermas (1984; see also Walzer, 1983) considered the influence of instrumental action upon the democratic potential of institutions, associating the degradation of the democratic potential of major spheres of social life (e.g. state, social organisations, etc.) to their being taken over by models of strategic and instrumental rationality....
[...]
...Habermas (1984; see also Walzer, 1983) considered the influence of instrumental action upon the democratic potential of institutions, associating the degradation of the democratic potential of major spheres of social life (e.g. state, social organisations, etc.) to their being taken over by models…...
[...]
57 citations
Cites background from "Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pl..."
...3 The 'spheres' of justice (Walzer, 1983) are now transformed into the 'fronts' of 'struggle for recognition' (even more radical than that noted by Honneth, 1992)....
[...]
...There are also those that describe some spheres of justice like Walzer (1983); and those of the Hegelian Sittlichkeit; etc....
[...]
57 citations
Cites background from "Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pl..."
...Michael Walzer (1983) clearly agreed with Denhardt when he insisted that organizations must practice democracy as a reflection of distributive justice; indeed, he goes so far as to suggest that employees are entitled to select their own managers, just as citizens elect their own leaders....
[...]