scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality

Norman Daniels, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1985 - 
- Vol. 83, Iss: 1, pp 142
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Lawler as mentioned in this paper argued that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament, which is hardly a rational position in the sense that it is suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some.
Abstract
that a plurality of the American Catholic bishops endorse a nuclear freeze (p. 4), saying that they are thus "taking their stance with Moscow,55 which is for a freeze, and not with the Vatican, which "is still in favor of disarmament?not a freeze.55 To make any sense at all, Mr. Lawler must mean that being for the freeze means that one is not for disarmament? hardly a rational position. One recalls here the arguments, during the 19305s and 19405s, that being for racial justice in the United States was suspect if not immoral, in the eyes of some, because the communists also favored it.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK.

TL;DR: A study of decision-making within NICE focuses upon the tenor and orientation of deliberation about the adoption of health technologies, suggesting that deliberative assumptions and parameters pertaining to fluid and contestable ideas of transparent reasoning and domain competence both reflect and shape relationships of influence and marginality among participants.
Journal ArticleDOI

New agendas? Culture and citizenship in EU policy

TL;DR: This paper analyzed the connections between culture and citizenship in policy documents by the European Union and identified three semantic clusters: the ontological, the intercultural and the participatory, which they discussed in more detail.
DissertationDOI

Multi-dimensional personhood and the welfare state

TL;DR: The welfare state in Britain has been a subject of much ecclesiastical and pastoral concern since its inception, but this interest has not been matched by any comparable and sustained theological engagement as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Commodification of Care

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the question whether care work for dependent persons (children, the elderly, and disabled persons) may be entrusted to the market; that is, whether and to what extent there is a normative justification for the "commodification of care".