Stabilisation of infinitesimally rigid formations of multi-robot networks
Citations
2,198 citations
1,751 citations
360 citations
309 citations
243 citations
References
5,220 citations
"Stabilisation of infinitesimally ri..." refers background in this paper
...Theorem 3 (Wiggins 1990, p. 195): If the origin is stable under (18), then the origin of (16)–(17) is also stable....
[...]
4,693 citations
"Stabilisation of infinitesimally ri..." refers background or methods in this paper
...The starting point for our article is Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002). Following that article, we use graphs to define formations, but instead of global rigidity we use infinitesimal rigidity and instead of the double integrator model we use the simpler single integrator (kinematic point). More substantially, our stability analysis is complete whereas, being a conference paper, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) provides only a sketch. In particular, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) have no topological analysis of the equilibrium set and does not note that the equilibrium set is not compact. Moreover, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) use a LaSalle argument to prove stability, but since the equilibrium set is not compact, this is open to question....
[...]
...The starting point for our article is Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002). Following that article, we use graphs to define formations, but instead of global rigidity we use infinitesimal rigidity and instead of the double integrator model we use the simpler single integrator (kinematic point). More substantially, our stability analysis is complete whereas, being a conference paper, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) provides only a sketch. In particular, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) have no topological analysis of the equilibrium set and does not note that the equilibrium set is not compact....
[...]
...An interesting approach to formation control is that of Olfati-Saber (2006)....
[...]
...The starting point for our article is Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002). Following that article, we use graphs to define formations, but instead of global rigidity we use infinitesimal rigidity and instead of the double integrator model we use the simpler single integrator (kinematic point). More substantially, our stability analysis is complete whereas, being a conference paper, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) provides only a sketch. In particular, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) have no topological analysis of the equilibrium set and does not note that the equilibrium set is not compact. Moreover, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) use a LaSalle argument to prove stability, but since the equilibrium set is not compact, this is open to question. Furthermore, Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) do not address if the trajectories have a limit on the equilibrium set....
[...]
...Remark 2: The proof approach of Olfati-Saber and Murray (2002) is to quotient out the dynamics on the equilibrium manifold so the equilibrium is topologically equivalent to a point....
[...]
2,924 citations
2,445 citations
2,198 citations