Stakeholder Prioritization Work: The Role of Stakeholder Salience in Stakeholder Research
Citations
840 citations
96 citations
65 citations
Cites background from "Stakeholder Prioritization Work: Th..."
...…it has been suggested that “stakeholder work” (Lee, 2015) follows a somewhat typical cycle of first, stakeholder awareness work, then stakeholder identification work, followed by stakeholder understanding work, prioritization work, leading to stakeholder engagement work (Mitchell et al., 2017)....
[...]
...Recently, it has been suggested that “stakeholder work” (Lee, 2015) follows a somewhat typical cycle of first, stakeholder awareness work, then stakeholder identification work, followed by stakeholder understanding work, prioritization work, leading to stakeholder engagement work (Mitchell et al., 2017)....
[...]
32 citations
27 citations
Cites background or methods from "Stakeholder Prioritization Work: Th..."
...Still considered a good standard, this framework has influenced much research on stakeholder identification (Mitchell et al., 2017)....
[...]
...Having followed such an approach, the insights provided in Study I may also be of use for actors engaged in stakeholder work (Mitchell et al., 2017), such as community managers, or firms that seek to interact with...
[...]
...The following research question is pursued: what is the configuration of stakeholders, their salient relationships and the interests that constitute the Joomla ecosystem? Although scholars have accumulated a mass of research on stakeholder identification (Mitchell et al., 2017), particularised work in the realm of open source communities remains to be done....
[...]
...Therefore, a whole range of other important concepts have been leveraged to guide the stakeholder identification process, such as social status (Perrault, 2017), or social responsibility (Mitchell et al., 2017)....
[...]
References
18,472 citations
"Stakeholder Prioritization Work: Th..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Stakeholder awareness work captures at least in part Freeman’s (1984) notion that stakeholders are those who are affected by and who affect the organization—a broad-environment notion of stakeholder...
[...]
...Beginning with the Freeman (1984) definition, anyone with an interest in how a firm is managed, Barney (2016) paradoxically included only employees, suppliers, customers, debt-holders, and shareholders in his conceptualization....
[...]
...…Lee (2015) reintroduced and tested the concept of value creation stakeholder engagement, which was part of stakeholder theory from its inception (Freeman, 1984, 1994; Freeman, Harrison, & Wicks, 2007; Freeman, Wicks, & Parma, 2004; Freeman et al., 2010; Harrison, Bosse, & Phillips, 2010;…...
[...]
...2 A more general review of the stakeholder literature between 1997 and 2007 can be found in Agle, Donaldson, Freeman, Jensen, Mitchell, and Wood (2008)....
[...]
17,404 citations
13,229 citations
"Stakeholder Prioritization Work: Th..." refers background in this paper
...…means to impose its will in the relationship” (1997, p. 865); (2) legitimacy, “a generalized perception or assumption that the actions of an entity are desirable, proper, or appropriate within some socially constructed system of norms, values, beliefs, and definitions” (Suchman, 1995, p. 574)....
[...]
13,195 citations
10,630 citations
"Stakeholder Prioritization Work: Th..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Although the concept of stakeholder salience was first introduced by Mitchell et al. (1997), both its generation and its future development depend on interested scholarly and practitioner stakeholders.5 We thank all who have labored and who continue to labor so 4 We take note that the stakeholder…...
[...]
...Stakeholder prioritization work, in our view, took a step forward with the introduction of the stakeholder attribute cumulation approach to the assessment of stakeholder salience, as proposed by Mitchell et al. (1997)....
[...]
...…of Utah at the time), immediately supported by Donna Wood (whose influence on the 1997 manuscript and the tightlyreasoned construct development [see Suddaby, 2010] is recognized and gratefully acknowledged), and further diligently in the “stakeholder minefields” (Mitchell et al., 1997, p. 862)....
[...]
...Neville & Menguc 2006: 377 “We draw upon the theory of stakeholder identification and salience of Mitchell et al. (1997), which we argue provides a more relevant and significantly more illustrative explanation of the nature and effects of stakeholder interactions upon the organization than the…...
[...]
...We then revisit the stakeholder salience model (Mitchell et al., 1997) as a tool for enacting stakeholder prioritization work....
[...]