Journal ArticleDOI
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, an alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability, which is often used in clinical comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one.About:
This article is published in International Journal of Nursing Studies.The article was published on 2010-08-01. It has received 9160 citations till now.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
Matthew E. Ritchie,Belinda Phipson,Di Wu,Yifang Hu,Charity W. Law,Wei Shi,Gordon K. Smyth,Gordon K. Smyth +7 more
TL;DR: The philosophy and design of the limma package is reviewed, summarizing both new and historical features, with an emphasis on recent enhancements and features that have not been previously described.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Terry K. Koo,Mae Y. Li +1 more
TL;DR: A practical guideline for clinical researchers to choose the correct form of ICC is provided and the best practice of reporting ICC parameters in scientific publications is suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.
TL;DR: A wider understanding of reliability and adoption of the typical error as the standard measure of reliability would improve the assessment of tests and equipment in the authors' disciplines.
Journal ArticleDOI
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.
TL;DR: The SF-36 was able to detect low levels of ill health in patients who had scored 0 (good health) on the Nottingham health profile and is a promising new instrument for measuring health perception in a general population.
Journal ArticleDOI
Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine
Greg Atkinson,Alan M. Nevill +1 more
TL;DR: It is recommended that sports clinicians and researchers should cite and interpret a number of statistical methods for assessing reliability and encourage the inclusion of the LOA method, especially the exploration of heteroscedasticity that is inherent in this analysis.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies
Douglas G. Altman,J M Bland +1 more
TL;DR: This paper shall describe what is usually done, show why this is inappropriate, suggest a better approach, and ask why such studies are done so badly.
Journal ArticleDOI
Relation between initial blood pressure and its fall with treatment.
TL;DR: Positive correlations between pre-treatment blood-pressure and the fall in pressure after treatment was examined for most classes of antihypertensive drugs and suggests that for all manoeuvres response is related to the height of the pretreatment pressure.
Journal ArticleDOI
Comparison of the new miniature Wright peak flow meter with the standard Wright peak flow meter.
H G Oldham,M M Bevan,M McDermott +2 more
TL;DR: The new mini-meter may be enclosed in a case, making direct comparisons with other instruments possible, and agrees to within 3% with the standard peak flow meter, which is as close as the agreement between two standard instruments.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Nellcor N-101 pulse oximeter. A clinical evaluation in anaesthesia and intensive care.
J. A. Tytler,H. F. Seeley +1 more
TL;DR: The accuracy of the Nellcor N‐101 pulse oximeter has been evaluated in adult patients receiving general anaesthesia or intensive care and within the range tested (70–100 percent saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen) the readings were within I digit of the values obtained by in vitro measurement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Estimation of gestational age at birth. Comparison of two methods
G L Serfontein,A M Jaroszewicz +1 more
TL;DR: The 5 neurological reflexes described by Robinson (1966) were found to be accurate estimations of gestational age and may be used for babies of Gestational ages 29 to 37 weeks, but above 37 weeks the scoring system must be used.