Stochastic differential equations and their applications
Citations
764 citations
Additional excerpts
...When there are no interspecific interactions, a bounded system can be described by the purely logistic scheme ẋ1(t) = x1(t)[b1 − a11x1(t)] ẋ2(t) = x2(t)[b2 − a22x2(t)] , (4) for positive parameters b1, b2, a11 and a22....
[...]
714 citations
520 citations
433 citations
Additional excerpts
...…to (19), and Q 1 0 and Q 2 0 are defined by Q 1 := " 2 G T 2 G 2 + 6 T 2 6 2 ; Q 2 := " 3 G T 3 G 3 : (22) By Itô's differential formula (see, e.g., [8]), the stochastic derivative of V (t; x(t)) along (10) can be obtained as follows: dV (t; x(t)) = 02x T (t)P (x(t)) 2 (x(t)) 0 Al1 (x(t)) 0 Bl2…...
[...]
386 citations
Cites background from "Stochastic differential equations a..."
...We refer to Theorem 2 in Alyushina [1], Theorem 1 in Krylov [21] and Theorem 2.4.1 in Mao [24] for existence and uniqueness results for SDEs of the form (1)....
[...]
...1 in Mao [24] for existence and uniqueness results for SDEs of the form (1)....
[...]
...In the same setting as in this article, Higham, Mao and Stuart showed in Theorem 5.3 in [12] (see also [11, 14, 22, 25, 34–37] and the references therein for more approximation results on implicit numerical methods for SDEs of the form (1)) that the implicit Euler scheme (6) converges with order 12 to the exact solution of the SDE (1) in the root mean square sense, that is, they established the existence of a real number C ∈ [0,∞) such that (E[‖XT − ˜̃Y NN‖2])1/2 ≤C ·N−1/2(7) for all N ∈N....
[...]
...In the literature (see, e.g., Theorem 10.2.2 in Kloeden and Platen [20], Theorem 1.1 in Milstein [27] or Theorem 3.1 in Yuan and Mao [38]) the convergence results for the explicit Euler scheme require the drift coefficient µ of the SDE (1) to be globally Lipschitz continuous or to grow at most linearly, which we have not assumed in our setting....
[...]
...In particular, in 2002, Higham, Mao and Stuart formulated in [12], page 1060, the following open problem: “In general, it is not clear when such moment bounds can be expected to hold for explicit methods with f, g ∈C1” (drift and diffusion coefficients are denoted by f and g in [12] instead of µ and σ here)....
[...]