Structural Damage Identification Using Improved RBF Neural Networks in Frequency Domain
Citations
89 citations
28 citations
14 citations
12 citations
Cites background or methods from "Structural Damage Identification Us..."
...The Euclidean distance is calculated from xm ci k k(2) (Machavaram and Shankar, 2012)....
[...]
...where Wni is the weight vector in the output layer for the nth output node and i is the radial basis function of the ith node (Machavaram and Shankar, 2012)....
[...]
...The output from the i th Gaussian neuron from an input xm is calculated using i ¼ exp xm cik k2 2i ð1Þ The Euclidean distance is calculated from xm cik k2 (Machavaram and Shankar, 2012)....
[...]
...The output of the hidden neuron is computed as: yn¼ X i Wni i ð2Þ where Wni is the weight vector in the output layer for the nth output node and i is the radial basis function of the ith node (Machavaram and Shankar, 2012)....
[...]
10 citations
Cites background from "Structural Damage Identification Us..."
...Changes in the physical properties will cause changes in the modal properties (Machavaram and Shankar, 2012)....
[...]
References
18 citations
"Structural Damage Identification Us..." refers methods or result in this paper
...…first stage prediction results in this study were considered as the conventional RBF network (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011) results to compare the performance of the improved two stage RBF network....
[...]
...…the applicability of the improved RBF methodology, and its performance was compared with conventional RBF method i.e., first stage of the proposed RBF (Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011) and CPN-BPN hybrid method (Prashant and Shankar 2008) in terms of accuracy and computational effort....
[...]
...The first stage prediction results in this study were considered as the conventional RBF network (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011) results to compare the performance of the improved two stage RBF network....
[...]
...…effort and compared with the conventional RBF method (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011); and with the other traditional methods, particularly the work published by Prashant and Shankar (2008)....
[...]
...The performance of the proposed improved RBF method is examined in terms of accuracy and computational effort and compared with the conventional RBF method (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011); and with the other traditional methods, particularly the work published by Prashant and Shankar (2008)....
[...]
16 citations
13 citations
"Structural Damage Identification Us..." refers methods or result in this paper
...The first stage prediction results in this study were considered as the conventional RBF network (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011) results to compare the performance of the improved two stage RBF network....
[...]
...…of the proposed improved RBF method is examined in terms of accuracy and computational effort and compared with the conventional RBF method (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011); and with the other…...
[...]
...Okafor and Dutta (2001) used radial basis function neural networks to predict the damage size and depth of aluminium and composite plates as measured from C-Scan results....
[...]
...The performance of the proposed improved RBF method is examined in terms of accuracy and computational effort and compared with the conventional RBF method (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011); and with the other traditional methods, particularly the work published by Prashant and Shankar (2008)....
[...]
...The first stage prediction results in this study were considered as the conventional RBF network (Okafor and Dutta 2001; Reddy and Ganguli 2003; Zang et al. 2007; EI-Shafie et al. 2010; Contreras et al. 2011; Zheng et al. 2011) results to compare the performance of the improved two stage RBF…...
[...]
8 citations
"Structural Damage Identification Us..." refers background in this paper
...Prashant and Shankar (2009) developed a hybrid neural network strategy for structural damage detection using time domain acceleration responses....
[...]
...This reduces the prediction efficiency and accuracy of the damage detection in single stage identification (Prashant and Shankar 2008, 2009)....
[...]