scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team and formal organizational integration mechanisms, and contributes to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambideXterity.
Abstract
textPrior studies have emphasized that structural attributes are crucial to simultaneously pursuing exploration and exploitation, yet our understanding of antecedents of ambidexterity is still limited. Structural differentiation can help ambidextrous organizations to maintain multiple inconsistent and conflicting demands; however, differentiated exploratory and exploitative activities need to mobilized, coordinated, integrated, and applied. Based on this idea, we delineate formal and informal senior team integration mechanisms (i.e. contingency rewards and social integration) and formal and informal organizational integration mechanisms (i.e. cross-functional interfaces and connectedness) and examine how they mediate the relationship between structural differentiation and ambidexterity. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team (i.e. senior team social integration) and formal organizational (i.e. cross-functional interfaces) integration mechanisms. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambidexterity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Unravelling the internal and external drivers of digital servitization: A dynamic capabilities and contingency perspective on firm strategy

TL;DR: In this article, a dynamic capabilities lens was used to examine the relationship between two organizational mechanisms (exploitation and exploration) and firms' orientation towards digitization, servitization, and digital servitisation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring the Role of Leadership in Enabling Contextual Ambidexterity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the daily practices leaders enact to stimulate exploration and exploitation as well as to shift dynamically between them to (re)gain contextual ambidexterity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: Evidence from a transitional economy

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the case of Chinese high-tech SMEs and develop a strategic orientation framework distinguishing between exploitation and exploration-type opportunities which accounts for the possibility that managers of such firms may attend to one, both, or neither.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case

TL;DR: It is shown that the deliberate use of ambiguity and explicitness can function as a countervailing mechanism against overemphasizing either exploration or exploitation and that "requisite security" can help to motivate suppliers to address the paradoxical tensions deliberately created by buying firms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unfolding the ambidextrous effects of proactive and responsive market orientation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the ambidextrous effects of its proactive and responsive dimension on market orientation and derive hypotheses on the joint effects of combining and balancing proactive and market orientation.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

TL;DR: This article seeks to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ, and delineates the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena.
Book ChapterDOI

Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the link between firm resources and sustained competitive advantage and analyzed the potential of several firm resources for generating sustained competitive advantages, including value, rareness, imitability, and substitutability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the ability of a firm to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends is critical to its innovative capabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management

TL;DR: The dynamic capabilities framework as mentioned in this paper analyzes the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in environments of rapid technological change, and suggests that private wealth creation in regimes of rapid technology change depends in large measure on honing intemal technological, organizational, and managerial processes inside the firm.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the evaluation of structural equation models

TL;DR: In this article, structural equation models with latent variables are defined, critiqued, and illustrated, and an overall program for model evaluation is proposed based upon an interpretation of converging and diverging evidence.
Related Papers (5)