scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team and formal organizational integration mechanisms, and contributes to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambideXterity.
Abstract
textPrior studies have emphasized that structural attributes are crucial to simultaneously pursuing exploration and exploitation, yet our understanding of antecedents of ambidexterity is still limited. Structural differentiation can help ambidextrous organizations to maintain multiple inconsistent and conflicting demands; however, differentiated exploratory and exploitative activities need to mobilized, coordinated, integrated, and applied. Based on this idea, we delineate formal and informal senior team integration mechanisms (i.e. contingency rewards and social integration) and formal and informal organizational integration mechanisms (i.e. cross-functional interfaces and connectedness) and examine how they mediate the relationship between structural differentiation and ambidexterity. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team (i.e. senior team social integration) and formal organizational (i.e. cross-functional interfaces) integration mechanisms. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambidexterity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on a variety of cognate literatures to discuss the field-level structural characteristics and organizational attributes that shape institutional complexity and explore the repertoire of strategies and structures that organizations deploy to cope with multiple, competing demands.
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance

TL;DR: An overview of the seven articles included in this special issue is provided and several avenues for future research are suggested.
Posted Content

Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future

TL;DR: Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit--to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations

TL;DR: The exploration and exploitation framework has attracted substantial interest from scholars studying phenomena such as organizational learning, knowledge management, innovation, organizational design, and strategic alliances as discussed by the authors, and it has become an essential lens for interpreting various behaviors and outcomes within and across organizations.
Journal ArticleDOI

CROSSROADS---Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments

TL;DR: Overall, this work contributes a more accurate view of how leaders effectively balance between efficiency and flexibility by emphasizing heuristics-based “strategies of simple rules,” multiple environmental realities, and higher-order “expert” cognition.
References
More filters

Sistemas de gestión ambiental, diseño organizativo y desempeño: un análisis de la industria hotelera española

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyze the relationship between certified environmental management systems and several variables, studying both determinants that may facilitate the implementation of these systems and their consequences, and analyze the linkage between environmental certification and environmental performance.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Leaders’ ambidexterity traits

TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the literature to extract the characteristics of ambidextrous leaders capable to cope with these tensions, in order to achieve organizational innovations and to balance trade-offs among the competing objectives regarding exploration and exploitation and to reduce the organization's tendency to focus only in one of them.

Ambidexterity in dyadic NPD relationships

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine individual ambidexterity (i.e., an individual's ambidextrous orientation and experience) of two key actors in NPD projects, namely industrial designers and NPD project managers, and how these actors interact with each other during NPD Projects.
Dissertation

Dynamics of Optimal Balance Between Exploration and Exploitation: In the View of Capability and Embeddedness

서은광
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated how the varying level of a firm's technological capability and network position within industry alliances affects the location of the optimal balance point of the firm, and found that the proportion of exploration has an inverted-U-shaped relationship with innovation performance.
Related Papers (5)