scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team and formal organizational integration mechanisms, and contributes to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambideXterity.
Abstract
textPrior studies have emphasized that structural attributes are crucial to simultaneously pursuing exploration and exploitation, yet our understanding of antecedents of ambidexterity is still limited. Structural differentiation can help ambidextrous organizations to maintain multiple inconsistent and conflicting demands; however, differentiated exploratory and exploitative activities need to mobilized, coordinated, integrated, and applied. Based on this idea, we delineate formal and informal senior team integration mechanisms (i.e. contingency rewards and social integration) and formal and informal organizational integration mechanisms (i.e. cross-functional interfaces and connectedness) and examine how they mediate the relationship between structural differentiation and ambidexterity. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously asserted direct effect of structural differentiation on ambidexterity operates through informal senior team (i.e. senior team social integration) and formal organizational (i.e. cross-functional interfaces) integration mechanisms. Through this richer explanation and empirical assessment, we contribute to a greater clarity and better understanding of how organizations may effectively pursue exploration and exploitation simultaneously to achieve ambidexterity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on a variety of cognate literatures to discuss the field-level structural characteristics and organizational attributes that shape institutional complexity and explore the repertoire of strategies and structures that organizations deploy to cope with multiple, competing demands.
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance

TL;DR: An overview of the seven articles included in this special issue is provided and several avenues for future research are suggested.
Posted Content

Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future

TL;DR: Organizational ambidexterity refers to the ability of an organization to both explore and exploit--to compete in mature technologies and markets where efficiency, control, and incremental improvement are prized and to also compete in new technologies as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations

TL;DR: The exploration and exploitation framework has attracted substantial interest from scholars studying phenomena such as organizational learning, knowledge management, innovation, organizational design, and strategic alliances as discussed by the authors, and it has become an essential lens for interpreting various behaviors and outcomes within and across organizations.
Journal ArticleDOI

CROSSROADS---Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments

TL;DR: Overall, this work contributes a more accurate view of how leaders effectively balance between efficiency and flexibility by emphasizing heuristics-based “strategies of simple rules,” multiple environmental realities, and higher-order “expert” cognition.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Configurations of effectuation, causation, and bricolage: implications for firm growth paths

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine how firms' decision-making logics and entrepreneurial resourcing behaviors combine to create value and conduct a qualitative comparative analysis investigating configurations of effectuation, causation, and bricolage associated with firm performance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ambidexterity's mediating impact on product development proficiency and new product performance

TL;DR: In this article, the mediating impact of ambidexterity on the relationship between product development proficiency and new product performance was examined using survey data from 253 Taiwanese firms, and the results indicated that the significance of the direct effect of marketing proficiency and technical proficiency on new products performance was reduced when the indirect effect of combining marketing proficiency with technical proficiency was included in the model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors

TL;DR: In this paper, the role played by external forces (munificence and dynamism) and internal slack resources on the relationships between ambidextrous organizational culture and contextual ambidexterity and between contextual ambidesterity, and new product innovation outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

System dynamics and innovation in food networks

TL;DR: In this article, an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) was used to deal with the socioeconomic complex decisions of a 57 million liter/year biodiesel plant in the semi-arid region of North of Minas Gerais State, where the socioeconomic indicators are very unfavorable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizational ambidexterity and firm performance: Burning research questions for marketing scholars

TL;DR: A detailed analysis of organizational ambidexterity can be found in this article, where the authors identify the burning research questions marketing scholars should give urgent attention to advance theory and practice.
Related Papers (5)