Journal Article•
Studi respon siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan taksonomi solo
TL;DR: In this paper, Fikri Bawen et al. found out the pattern of students' responses levels in doing problem solving items based on SOLO taxonomy and to find out the students' obstacles in doing mathematical problem-solving items.
Abstract: Salah satu kerangka yang digunakan sebagai rujukan menganalisis respon siswa yaitu taksonomi SOLO. Tujuan penelitian adalah (1) menemukan pola tingkat respon siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah berdasarkan taksonomi SOLO dan (2) menemukan hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika. Metode penelitian ini yaitu pendekatan kualitatif. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah 24 siswa putri dan 18 siswa putra kelas VIII SMP IT Darul Fikri Bawen. Hasil penelitian ini adalah respon siswa putri pada level prestructural sebanyak 25, 42% , unistructural sebanyak 10, 83%, multistructural sebanyak 32, 92%, relational sebanyak 20, 83% dan extended abstract sebanyak 10%. Untuk hasil respon siswa putra pada level prestructural sebanyak 16, 67%, unistructural sebanyak 9, 44%, multistructural sebanyak 32, 22%, relational sebanyak 38, 33% dan extended abstract sebanyak 3, 33 %. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini yaitu guru perlu memberi banyak latihan keterampilan memahami masalah, mengaplikasikan rumus, dan meninjau kembali jawaban. One of frameworks used as a reference to analyze students’ responses is SOLO taxonomy. The purposes of the study were to find out the pattern of students’ responses levels in doing problem solving items based on SOLO taxonomy and to find out the students’ obstacles in doing mathematical problem solving items. The research method used in this study was a qualitative research. The data sources of this study were 24 female students and 18 male students of the eight grade of SMP IT Darul Fikri Bawen. The results of the study showed that for female students, 25,42% of them belonged to prestructural level, 10,83% of them belonged to unistructural response level, 32,92 % of them belonged to multistructural response level, 20,83% of them belonged to relational response level, and 10% of them belonged to extended abstract response level. Meanwhile, for male students, 16,67% of them belonged to prestructural response level, 9,44% of them belonged to unistructural response level, 32,22 % of them belonged to multistructural response level, 38,33% of them belonged to relational response level, and 3,33% of them belonged to extended abstract response level. The recommendations of this study are to give more exercises in understanding the problem.
Citations
More filters
Posted Content•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a qualitative explorative method to obtain a description of the mathematical problem-solving ability of first year students of the Statistics Department at Universitas Negeri Makassar in South Sulawesi, Indonesia, based on the SOLO taxonomy and the cognitive style.
Abstract: The aim of this study is to obtain a description of the mathematical problem-solving ability of first year students of the Statistics Department at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, based on the SOLO taxonomy and the cognitive style This study uses a qualitative explorative method The hypothesis of the study was that students who exhibit a field independent (FI) cognitive style have a higher level of capability in terms of the SOLO taxonomy levels for problem-solving of mathematics than students who have the field dependent (FD) cognitive style The results of this study show that a SOLO taxonomy level for the GK-FD subject is pre-structural and the GK-FI subject is uni-structural
36 citations
Cites methods from "Studi respon siswa dalam menyelesai..."
...Table 1 details the student response indicator used by the SOLO taxonomy role in this study, as adjusted for indicators according to Chick [17] and validated experts [18]....
[...]
26 Mar 2017
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a qualitative explorative method to obtain a description of the mathematical problem-solving ability of first year students of the Statistics Department at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassara, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, based on the SOLO taxonomy and the cognitive style.
Abstract: The aim of this study is to obtain a description of the mathematical problem-solving ability of first year students of the Statistics Department at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, based on the SOLO taxonomy and the cognitive style. This study uses a qualitative explorative method. The hypothesis of the study was that students who exhibit a field independent (FI) cognitive style have a higher level of capability in terms of the SOLO taxonomy levels for problem-solving of mathematics than students who have the field dependent (FD) cognitive style. The results of this study show that a SOLO taxonomy level for the GK-FD subject is pre-structural and the GK-FI subject is uni-structural.
24 citations
01 Jan 2021
TL;DR: In this article, the level of student response with logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, and visual-spatial intelligence tendency in solving mathematical problems of linear programming material based on SOLO taxonomy was determined.
Abstract: This research aimed to determine the level of student response with logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, and visual-spatial intelligence tendency in solving mathematical problems of linear programming material based on SOLO taxonomy. The level of students’ responses as the output in this research is expected to be used as a reference by mathematics teachers to determine the appropriate learning methods and strategies in accordance with the tendency of students' multiple intelligence types. It can be useful in realizing the effectiveness of mathematics learning about what needs to improved and emphasized in learning so that all students can achieve optimal responses in solving mathematical problem and can develop their multiple intelligences. This research is descriptive qualitative research with six students in the 11 th Grade of SMAN 1 Gondanglegi as research subjects: two students with logical-mathematical intelligence tendency, two students with verbal-linguistic intelligence tendency, and two students with visual-spatial intelligence tendency. Data collection was done by providing multiple intelligence classification tests, linear programming problem tests, and interviews. The result of the research showed the students’ response level in solving the mathematical problem of linear programming material based on SOLO taxonomy is that students with logical-mathematical intelligence tendency reached extended abstract response level, students with verbal-linguistic intelligence tendency reached multistructural response level, and students with visual-spatial intelligence tendency reached multistructural and relational response level .
8 citations
Cites background from "Studi respon siswa dalam menyelesai..."
...Through the process of solving mathematical problems by students, teachers can find out the responses of each student as an effort to develop students' mathematical thinking processes (Ekawati et al., 2013)....
[...]
13 Jun 2019
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe nine grade students' cognitive abilities in solving the problem of two-variable linear equations (PLDV) through solo taxonomy and show the students' understanding and problem-solving abilities based on their cognitive abilities.
Abstract: This research is qualitative descriptive research which aims to describe ninth grade students' cognitive abilities in solving the problem of two-variable linear equations (PLDV) through Solo Taxonomy. The techniques of data collection were tests, interviews, and documentation. The credibility of the data in this research is guaranteed using the triangulation method. The results of this research, based on five levels of Solo Taxonomy, show the students' understanding and problem-solving abilities based on their cognitive abilities. In this case, the subject of high cognitive ability (DW) was able to reach five levels of the Solo Taxonomy and the subject of moderate cognitive ability (RN) was able to reach three levels of the Solo Taxonomy. So that it can be said that the two subjects were able to understand and solve the problem of two-variable linear equations (PLDV). The subject of low cognitive ability (AB) was able to reach one level of Solo Taxonomy so that it can be said that the subject has not been able to understand and solve PLDV problems.
4 citations
13 Jun 2019
TL;DR: The results of the study show that the most errors done by the students are at the multi-structural level caused by the addition errors and the lack of subjects’ accuracy.
Abstract: The aim of this research is to review students’ error in calculating the definite integral of trigonometric functions using Solo Taxonomy. This research is descriptive qualitative research. The results of the study show that the most errors done by the students are at the multi-structural level caused by the addition errors and the lack of subjects’ accuracy. Errors at the pre-structural level are the errors done by the subjectswho do not understand the purpose of the problems given. At the uni-structural level, the subjects make mistakes by applying the concept from the beginning of the problem. At the relational level, the subject uses a concept that is not common to solve problems but it has passed through several steps of completion. The results of this study can be a reference to anticipate and reduce students’ errors in calculating the definite integral of trigonometric functions.
3 citations