Substrate effect on electrodeposited copper morphology and crystal shapes
TL;DR: In this paper, the surface morphology varies with the change in overpotential, but not with change in substrate, and the crystal shape is independent of the applied over-potential but varies with bath chemistry or choice of substrate.
Abstract: Copper has been electrodeposited on copper (FCC) and mild steel (BCC) substrates from acidic sulphate bath with and without cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide at 0.25, 2, 6 and 9 V. It is found that the surface morphology varies with the change in overpotential, but not with the change in substrate. On the contrary, the crystal shape is found to be independent of the applied overpotential, but varies with the bath chemistry or choice of substrate.
...read more
Citations
29 citations
16 citations
8 citations
Cites methods from "Substrate effect on electrodeposite..."
...By adjusting the deposition parameters in the electrodeposition, the grain size can be controlled.([23]) In this investigation, the machining characteristics of PCD by EDM in different parameters were studied by using Cu-Ni electrode prepared with electrodeposition and the removal mechanism in EDM was summarized....
[...]
4 citations
3 citations
Cites background from "Substrate effect on electrodeposite..."
...This result indicates that standard reduction potentials alone do not determine the composition of the deposit; other factors, such as metal concentration, pH, ionic strength, additives, the kind of substrate, chelating agents, mode of electrodeposition (chronoamperometry or chronopotentiometry), applied current signal, temperature, and fluid-dynamic conditions, all work together to determine the characteristics of deposition (Banthia et al., 2017; Ibañez and Fatás, 2005; Kim et al., 2018a; Maarof et al., 2017)....
[...]
References
4,266 citations
359 citations
171 citations
150 citations
99 citations