scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Surgical Mortality as an Indicator of Hospital Quality

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors used the 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) and sample size calculations were performed to determine the minimum caseload necessary to reliably detect increased mortality rates in poorly performing hospitals.
Abstract
CONTEXT Surgical mortality rates are increasingly used to measure hospital quality. It is not clear, however, how many hospitals have sufficient caseloads to reliably identify quality problems. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the 7 operations for which mortality has been advocated as a quality indicator by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery, repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, pancreatic resection, esophageal resection, pediatric heart surgery, craniotomy, hip replacement) are performed frequently enough to reliably identify hospitals with increased mortality rates. DESIGN AND SETTING The US national average mortality rates and hospital caseloads of the 7 operations were determined using the 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), and sample size calculations were performed to determine the minimum caseload necessary to reliably detect increased mortality rates in poorly performing hospitals. A 3-year hospital caseload was used for the baseline analysis, and poor performance was defined as a mortality rate double the national average. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Proportion of hospitals in the United States that performed more than the minimum caseload for each operation. RESULTS The national average mortality rates for the 7 procedures examined ranged from 0.3% for hip replacement to 10.7% for craniotomy. Minimum hospital caseloads necessary to detect a doubling of the mortality rate were 64 cases for craniotomy, 77 for esophageal resection, 86 for pancreatic resection, 138 for pediatric heart surgery, 195 for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, 219 for CABG surgery, and 2668 for hip replacement. For only 1 operation did the majority of hospitals exceed the minimum caseload, with 90% of hospitals performing CABG surgery having a caseload of 219 or higher. For the remaining operations, only a small proportion of hospitals met the minimum caseload: craniotomy (33%), pediatric heart surgery (25%), repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (8%), pancreatic resection (2%), esophageal resection (1%), and hip replacement (<1%). CONCLUSION Except for CABG surgery, the operations for which surgical mortality has been advocated as a quality indicator are not performed frequently enough to judge hospital quality.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide

TL;DR: Information on routine medical care and practice, with more clinical context than ever before, is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: The early and late mortality rates after bariatric surgery are low and can be subjected to risk stratification for comparative analyses and prospective risk assessments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.

TL;DR: Among hospitals in the Premier Inc Perspective Database reporting SCIP performance, adherence measured through a global all-or-none composite infection-prevention score was associated with a lower probability of developing a postoperative infection, however, adherence reported on individual SCIP measures, which is the only form in which performance is publicly reported, was notassociated with a significantly lower probabilities of infection.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity

TL;DR: A 44-year-old obese woman (height, 1.7 m [65 in.]) has seen her primary care physician for the past 10 years for management of conditions related to her obesity, including diabetes, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.

TL;DR: Provider-specific outcomes, particularly inpatient mortality, may be evaluated differently depending on the comorbidity risk adjustment model selected, and future research assessing and comparing the performance of the Charlson and Elixhauser measures in predicting long-term outcomes would be of value.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials.

TL;DR: Concern for the probability of missing an important therapeutic improvement because of small sample sizes deserves more attention in the planning of clinical trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between surgeon volume and operative mortality in eight cardiovascular procedures and found that surgeon volume was inversely related to operative mortality for all eight procedures (P=0.003 for lung resection, P<0.001 for all other procedures).
Journal ArticleDOI

The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

TL;DR: The future of the NSQIP lies in expanding it to the private sector and in enhancing its capabilities by incorporating additional measures of outcome, structure, process, and cost.

Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative.

TL;DR: The impetus for the group’s formation was the realization that the model of purchasing health care in the 1990s had created gridlock, and that “leapfrogging” to a new generation of innovation was necessary.