Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review
Paul C. Struik,Thomas W. Kuyper +1 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors review different forms of intensification, different principles and concepts underlying them, as well as the norms and values that are needed to guide the search for effective forms of sustainable and ecological intensification.Abstract:
Agricultural intensification is required to feed the growing and increasingly demanding human population. Intensification is associated with increasing use of resources, applied as efficiently as possible, i.e. with a concurrent increase in both resource use and resource use efficiency. Resource use efficiency has agronomic, environmental, economic, social, trans-generational, and global dimensions. Current industrial agriculture privileges economic resource use efficiency over the other dimensions, claiming that that pathway is necessary to feed the world. Current agronomy and the concept of sustainable intensification are contested. Sustainable intensification needs to include clarity about principles and practices for priority setting, an all-inclusive and explicit cost-benefit analysis, and subsequent weighing of trade-offs, based on scientifically acceptable, shared norms, thus making agriculture “green” again. Here, we review different forms of intensification, different principles and concepts underlying them, as well as the norms and values that are needed to guide the search for effective forms of sustainable and ecological intensification. We also address innovations in research and education required to create the necessary knowledge base. We argue that sustainable intensification should be considered as a process of enquiry and analysis for navigating and sorting out the issues and concerns in agronomy. Sustainable intensification is about societal negotiation, institutional innovation, justice, and adaptive management. We also make a plea for at least two alternative framings of sustainable intensification: one referring to the need for “de-intensification” in high-input systems to become more sustainable and one referring to the need to increase inputs and thereby yields where there are currently large yield (and often also efficiency) gaps. Society needs an agriculture that demonstrates resilience under future change, an agronomy that can cope with the diversity of trade-offs across different stakeholders, and a sustainability that is perceived as a dynamic process based on agreed values and shared knowledge, insight, and wisdom.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the concept of responsible innovation has not been widely considered in agriculture, although two recent papers have made useful suggestions, namely, anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness.
Journal Article
Shallow non-inversion tillage in organic farming maintains crop yields and increases soil C stocks
Julia Cooper,Marcin Barański,Gavin B. Stewart,Majimcha Nobel de Lange,Paolo Bàrberi,Andreas Fließbach,Joséphine Peigné,Alfred Berner,Christopher Brock,Marion Casagrande,Oliver Crowley,Christophe David,De Alex Vliegher,Thomas F. Döring,Aurélien Dupont,Martin H. Entz,Meike Grosse,Thorsten Haase,Caroline Halde,Verena Hammerl,H.F. Huiting,Günter Leithold,Monika Messmer,Michael Schloter,Wijnand Sukkel,van der Marcel G.A. Heijden,Koen Willekens,Raphaël Wittwer,Paul Mäder +28 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the trade-offs between reducing tillage intensity, crop yields, weed incidence, and soil C stocks were assessed for different categories of reduced tillage under organic management.
Journal ArticleDOI
Advancing Intercropping Research and Practices in Industrialized Agricultural Landscapes
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on intercropping and how this agroecological practice can be used to increase the sustainability of crop production and how to increase crop yields through resource partitioning and facilitation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review
Jean-Philippe Deguine,Jean-Noël Aubertot,Rica Joy Flor,Françoise Lescourret,Kris A.G. Wyckhuys,Alain Ratnadass +5 more
TL;DR: Agroecological Crop Protection is proposed as a concept that captures how agroecology can be optimally put to the service of crop protection, an interdisciplinary scientific field that comprises an orderly strategy at the field, farm, and agricultural landscape level and a dimension of social and organizational ecology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measuring the potential for sustainable intensification of aquaculture in Bangladesh using life cycle assessment
Patrik J. G. Henriksson,Patrik J. G. Henriksson,Ben Belton,Khondker Murshed-e Jahan,Khondker Murshed-e Jahan,Andreu Rico +5 more
TL;DR: Life cycle assessment is operationalized here as a tool to evaluate a range of environmental impacts resulting from the intensification of aquaculture production in Bangladesh and a subset of trade-offs among them, and simple changes in fish farming technology and management practices that could help make the global transition to more intensive forms of Aquaculture be more sustainable.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
TL;DR: The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems as discussed by the authors, whereas science has developed to deal with tame problems.
Journal ArticleDOI
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Will Steffen,Will Steffen,Katherine Richardson,Johan Rockström,Sarah Cornell,Ingo Fetzer,Elena M. Bennett,Reinette Biggs,Reinette Biggs,Stephen R. Carpenter,Wim de Vries,Cynthia A. de Wit,Carl Folke,Carl Folke,Dieter Gerten,Jens Heinke,Jens Heinke,Jens Heinke,Georgina M. Mace,Linn Persson,Veerabhadran Ramanathan,Veerabhadran Ramanathan,Belinda Reyers,Belinda Reyers,Sverker Sörlin +24 more
TL;DR: An updated and extended analysis of the planetary boundary (PB) framework and identifies levels of anthropogenic perturbations below which the risk of destabilization of the Earth system (ES) is likely to remain low—a “safe operating space” for global societal development.
Journal ArticleDOI
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Jonathan A. Foley,Navin Ramankutty,Kate A. Brauman,E. S. Cassidy,James S. Gerber,M. Johnston,Nathaniel D. Mueller,Christine S. O’Connell,Deepak K. Ray,Paul C. West,Christian Balzer,Elena M. Bennett,Stephen R. Carpenter,Jason Hill,Chad Monfreda,Stephen Polasky,Johan Rockström,John Sheehan,Stefan Siebert,David Tilman,David P. M. Zaks +20 more
TL;DR: It is shown that tremendous progress could be made by halting agricultural expansion, closing ‘yield gaps’ on underperforming lands, increasing cropping efficiency, shifting diets and reducing waste, which could double food production while greatly reducing the environmental impacts of agriculture.