Systematic Review: Process of Forming Academic Service Partnerships to Reform Clinical Education

doi:10.1177/0193945910394380

Home
/
Papers
/
Systematic Review: Process of Forming Academic Service Partnerships to Reform Clinical Education

Journal Article•DOI•

Systematic Review: Process of Forming Academic Service Partnerships to Reform Clinical Education

Fatemeh Heshmati Nabavi¹, Zohreh Vanaki¹, Eesa Mohammadi¹•Institutions (1)

Tarbiat Modares University¹

01 Feb 2012-Western Journal of Nursing Research (SAGE Publications)-Vol. 34, Iss: 1, pp 118-141

TL;DR: This study’s findings can provide practical guidelines to steer partnership programs within the academic and clinical bodies, with the aim of providing a collaborative partnership approach to clinical education.

read less

Abstract: The aim of our systematic review was to retrieve and integrate relevant evidence related to the process of formation and implementation of the academic–service partnership, with the aim of reformin...

...read moreread less

Citations

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Journal Article•DOI•

Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016.

[...]

Kimberly D. Miller¹, Rebecca L. Siegel¹, Chun Chieh Lin¹, Angela B. Mariotto, Joan L. Kramer², Julia H. Rowland, Kevin Stein¹, Rick Alteri¹, Ahmedin Jemal¹ - Show less +5 more•Institutions (2)

American Cancer Society¹, Emory University²

01 Jul 2016-CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

TL;DR: The number of cancer survivors continues to increase because of both advances in early detection and treatment and the aging and growth of the population and for the public health community to better serve these survivors, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute collaborate to estimate the number of current and future cancer survivors.

...read moreread less

Abstract: The number of cancer survivors continues to increase because of both advances in early detection and treatment and the aging and growth of the population. For the public health community to better serve these survivors, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute collaborate to estimate the number of current and future cancer survivors using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries. In addition, current treatment patterns for the most prevalent cancer types are presented based on information in the National Cancer Data Base and treatment-related side effects are briefly described. More than 15.5 million Americans with a history of cancer were alive on January 1, 2016, and this number is projected to reach more than 20 million by January 1, 2026. The 3 most prevalent cancers are prostate (3,306,760), colon and rectum (724,690), and melanoma (614,460) among males and breast (3,560,570), uterine corpus (757,190), and colon and rectum (727,350) among females. More than one-half (56%) of survivors were diagnosed within the past 10 years, and almost one-half (47%) are aged 70 years or older. People with a history of cancer have unique medical and psychosocial needs that require proactive assessment and management by primary care providers. Although there are a growing number of tools that can assist patients, caregivers, and clinicians in navigating the various phases of cancer survivorship, further evidence-based resources are needed to optimize care. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:271-289. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

...read moreread less

5,516 citations

Journal Article•DOI•

Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics

[...]

Glenn R. Gibson¹, Robert W. Hutkins, Mary Ellen Sanders, Susan L. Prescott², Raylene A. Reimer³, Seppo Salminen⁴, Karen P. Scott⁵, Catherine Stanton⁶, Kelly S. Swanson⁷, Patrice D. Cani⁸, Kristin Verbeke, Gregor Reid⁹ - Show less +8 more•Institutions (9)

University of Reading¹, University of Western Australia², University of Calgary³, University of Turku⁴, University of Aberdeen⁵, Teagasc⁶, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign⁷, Université catholique de Louvain⁸, University of Western Ontario⁹

14 Jun 2017-Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

TL;DR: The goal of this Consensus Statement is to engender appropriate use of the term 'prebiotic' by relevant stakeholders so that consistency and clarity can be achieved in research reports, product marketing and regulatory oversight of the category.

...read moreread less

Abstract: With the continued interest in the role of the gut microbiota in health, attention has now turned to how to harness the microbiota for the benefit of the host. This Consensus Statement outlines the definition and scope of the term 'prebiotic' as determined by an expert panel convened by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics in December 2016. In December 2016, a panel of experts in microbiology, nutrition and clinical research was convened by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics to review the definition and scope of prebiotics. Consistent with the original embodiment of prebiotics, but aware of the latest scientific and clinical developments, the panel updated the definition of a prebiotic: a substrate that is selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit. This definition expands the concept of prebiotics to possibly include non-carbohydrate substances, applications to body sites other than the gastrointestinal tract, and diverse categories other than food. The requirement for selective microbiota-mediated mechanisms was retained. Beneficial health effects must be documented for a substance to be considered a prebiotic. The consensus definition applies also to prebiotics for use by animals, in which microbiota-focused strategies to maintain health and prevent disease is as relevant as for humans. Ultimately, the goal of this Consensus Statement is to engender appropriate use of the term 'prebiotic' by relevant stakeholders so that consistency and clarity can be achieved in research reports, product marketing and regulatory oversight of the category. To this end, we have reviewed several aspects of prebiotic science including its development, health benefits and legislation.

...read moreread less

2,863 citations

Journal Article•DOI•

QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis

[...]

Peter Bankhead¹, Maurice B Loughrey¹, Maurice B Loughrey², José A Fernández¹, Yvonne Dombrowski¹, Darragh G. McArt¹, Philip D Dunne¹, Stephen McQuaid², Stephen McQuaid¹, Ronan T. Gray¹, Liam J. Murray¹, Helen G. Coleman¹, Jacqueline A James², Jacqueline A James¹, Manuel Salto-Tellez¹, Manuel Salto-Tellez², Peter W. Hamilton¹ - Show less +13 more•Institutions (2)

Queen's University Belfast¹, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust²

04 Dec 2017-Scientific Reports

TL;DR: QuPath provides researchers with powerful batch-processing and scripting functionality, and an extensible platform with which to develop and share new algorithms to analyze complex tissue images, making it suitable for a wide range of additional image analysis applications across biomedical research.

...read moreread less

Abstract: QuPath is new bioimage analysis software designed to meet the growing need for a user-friendly, extensible, open-source solution for digital pathology and whole slide image analysis. In addition to offering a comprehensive panel of tumor identification and high-throughput biomarker evaluation tools, QuPath provides researchers with powerful batch-processing and scripting functionality, and an extensible platform with which to develop and share new algorithms to analyze complex tissue images. Furthermore, QuPath’s flexible design makes it suitable for a wide range of additional image analysis applications across biomedical research.

...read moreread less

2,838 citations

Journal Article•DOI•

Frailty Consensus: A Call to Action

[...]

John E. Morley¹, Bruno Vellas², G. Abellan Van Kan², Stefan D. Anker³, Juergen M. Bauer⁴, Roberto Bernabei⁵, Matteo Cesari², Wm. Cameron Chumlea⁶, Wolfram Doehner³, Jonathan Evans, Linda P. Fried⁷, Jack M. Guralnik⁸, Paul R. Katz⁹, Theodore K. Malmstrom¹, Roger McCarter¹⁰, Luis Miguel Francisco Gutierrez Robledo, Kenneth Rockwood¹¹, Stephan von Haehling³, Maurits Vandewoude¹², Jeremy D. Walston¹³ - Show less +16 more•Institutions (13)

Saint Louis University¹, French Institute of Health and Medical Research², Charité³, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg⁴, The Catholic University of America⁵, Wright State University⁶, Columbia University⁷, University of Maryland, Baltimore⁸, University of Toronto⁹, Pennsylvania State University¹⁰, Dalhousie University¹¹, University of Antwerp¹², Johns Hopkins University¹³

01 Jun 2013-Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

TL;DR: For the purposes of optimally managing individuals with physical frailty, all persons older than 70 years and all individuals with significant weight loss (>5%) due to chronic disease should be screened for frailty.

...read moreread less

2,751 citations

Journal Article•DOI•

An official American thoracic society/European respiratory society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation

[...]

Martijn A. Spruit, Sally J Singh, Chris Garvey, Richard ZuWallack, Linda Nici, Anne E Holland¹, Suzanne C. Lareau, Fabio Pitta¹, Louise Sewell, Jo Raskin, Jean Bourbeau, Rebecca Crouch, Frits M.E. Franssen, Richard Casaburi, Jan H. Vercoulen, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Rik Gosselink, Enrico Clini, Tanja Effing, Job van der Palen, Thierry Troosters, Daisy J.A. Janssen, Eileen G. Collins, Judith Garcia-Aymerich, Dina Brooks, Bonnie Fahy, Milo A. Puhan, Martine Hoogendoorn, Rachel Garrod, Annemie M. W. J. Schols, Brian W. Carlin, Roberto P. Benzo, Mike Morgan, Andrew L. Ries, Roger S. Goldstein, Claire A. Dowson, Jan Brozek, Claudio F. Donner, Emiel F.M. Wouters - Show less +35 more•Institutions (1)

La Trobe University¹

15 Oct 2013-American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

TL;DR: The considerable growth in the science and application of pulmonary rehabilitation since 2006 adds further support for its efficacy in a wide range of individuals with chronic respiratory disease.

...read moreread less

Abstract: Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation is recognized as a core component of the management of individuals with chronic respiratory disease. Since the 2006 American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) Statement on Pulmonary Rehabilitation, there has been considerable growth in our knowledge of its efficacy and scope. Purpose: The purpose of this Statement is to update the 2006 document, including a new definition of pulmonary rehabilitation and highlighting key concepts and major advances in the field. Methods: A multidisciplinary committee of experts representing the ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly and the ERS Scientific Group 01.02, “Rehabilitation and Chronic Care,” determined the overall scope of this update through group consensus. Focused literature reviews in key topic areas were conducted by committee members with relevant clinical and scientific expertise. The final content of this Statement was agreed on by all members. Results: An updated definition of pulmonary rehabilitation is proposed. New data are presented on the science and application of pulmonary rehabilitation, including its effectiveness in acutely ill individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and in individuals with other chronic respiratory diseases. The important role of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic disease management is highlighted. In addition, the role of health behavior change in optimizing and maintaining benefits is discussed. Conclusions: The considerable growth in the science and application of pulmonary rehabilitation since 2006 adds further support for its efficacy in a wide range of individuals with chronic respiratory disease Read More: http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST

...read moreread less

2,734 citations

1
2
3
4
…
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200

Collapse

References

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Journal Article•DOI•

Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings

[...]

Lisa Bero¹, Roberto Grilli, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Emma Harvey, Andrew D Oxman², Mary Ann Thomson - Show less +2 more•Institutions (2)

University of California, San Francisco¹, University of Aberdeen²

15 Aug 1998-BMJ

TL;DR: Haines et al. as mentioned in this paper examined systematic reviews of different strategies for the dissemination and implementation of research findings to identify evidence of the effectiveness and to assess the quality of the systematic reviews.

...read moreread less

Abstract: This is the seventh in a series of eight articles analysing the gap between research and practice Series editors: Andrew Haines and Anna Donald Despite the considerable amount of money spent on clinical research relatively little attention has been paid to ensuring that the findings of research are implemented in routine clinical practice.1 There are many different types of intervention that can be used to promote behavioural change among healthcare professionals and the implementation of research findings. Disentangling the effects of intervention from the influence of contextual factors is difficult when interpreting the results of individual trials of behavioural change.2 Nevertheless, systematic reviews of rigorous studies provide the best evidence of the effectiveness of different strategies for promoting behavioural change. 3 4 In this paper we examine systematic reviews of different strategies for the dissemination and implementation of research findings to identify evidence of the effectiveness of different strategies and to assess the quality of the systematic reviews. #### Summary points Systematic reviews of rigorous studies provide the best evidence on the effectiveness of different strategies to promote the implementation of research findings Passive dissemination of information is generally ineffective It seems necessary to use specific strategies to encourage implementation of research based recommendations and to ensure changes in practice Further research on the relative effectiveness and efficiency of different strategies is required We searched Medline records dating from 1966 to June 1995 using a strategy developed in collaboration with the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The search identified 1139 references. No reviews from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group4 had been published during this time. In addition, we searched the Database of Abstracts of Research Effectiveness (DARE) (http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd) but did not identify any other review meeting the inclusion criteria. We searched for any review …

...read moreread less

2,156 citations

Book•

Organizations Working Together

[...]

Catherine Alter, Jerald Hage

01 Dec 1992

TL;DR: Interorganizational Networks A New Institution A Typology of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships and Networks What is Coordination? Environmental Determinants of Network Systems External Control and Technology Structural Properties Centrality, Size, Complexity, Differentiation, and Connectedness Conflict and Interorganization Effectiveness The Failure of Evolution Theoretical Implications, Practical Recommendations, and Global Applications

...read moreread less

Abstract: Interorganizational Networks A New Institution A Typology of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships and Networks What is Coordination? Environmental Determinants of Network Systems External Control and Technology Structural Properties Centrality, Size, Complexity, Differentiation, and Connectedness Conflict and Interorganizational Effectiveness The Failure of Evolution Theoretical Implications, Practical Recommendations, and Global Applications

...read moreread less

1,001 citations

Journal Article•DOI•

Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage.

[...]

Roz D. Lasker¹, Elisa S. Weiss¹, Rebecca Miller¹•Institutions (1)

New York Academy of Medicine¹

01 Jun 2001-Milbank Quarterly

TL;DR: A framework for operationalizing and assessing partnership synergy, and for identifying its likely determinants, can be used to address critical policy, evaluation, and management issues related to collaboration.

...read moreread less

Abstract: The substantial interest and investment in health partnerships in the United States is based on the assumption that collaboration is more effective in achieving health and health system goals than efforts carried out by single agents. A clear conceptualization of the mechanism that accounts for the collaborative advantage, and a way to measure it are needed to test this assumption and to strengthen the capacity of partnerships to realize the full potential of collaboration. The mechanism that gives collaboration its unique advantage is synergy. A framework for operationalizing and assessing partnership synergy, and for identifying its likely determinants, can be used to address critical policy, evaluation, and management issues related to collaboration.

...read moreread less

973 citations

"Systematic Review: Process of Formi..." refers background in this paper

...Estimates suggest that up to half of the partnerships that form do not survive their first year; of those that do, many falter in the development of plans or the implementation of interventions (Lasker et al., 2001)....
[...]
...In addition, building effective partnerships is time consuming, resource intensive, and very difficult (Lasker et al., 2001); moreover, partnerships have a tendency to be destroyed, particularly for weaker partners (Mayo, 1997)....
[...]
...…condition, there is great potential in partnerships that enable different people and organizations to support each other by leveraging, combining, and capitalizing on their complementary strengths and capabilities (Alter & Hage, 1993; Lasker et al., 2001; Zuckerman, Kaluzny, & Ricketts, 1995)....
[...]
...By combining the individual perspectives, resources, and skills of the partners, the group creates something new and valuable together—a whole that is greater than the sum of its individual parts (Lasker et al., 2001)....
[...]
...In such an organizational condition, there is great potential in partnerships that enable different people and organizations to support each other by leveraging, combining, and capitalizing on their complementary strengths and capabilities (Alter & Hage, 1993; Lasker et al., 2001; Zuckerman, Kaluzny, & Ricketts, 1995)....
[...]

Journal Article•DOI•

Dedicated Education Unit: an innovative clinical partner education model.

[...]

Susan Randles Moscato¹, Judith Miller, Karen Logsdon, Stephen Weinberg, Lori Chorpenning - Show less +1 more•Institutions (1)

University of Portland¹

01 Jan 2007-Nursing Outlook

TL;DR: This article describes the implementation and evaluation of the Dedicated Education Unit (DEU) as an innovative model of clinical nursing education and reports on a 3-year project to operationalize the DEU concept with 6 nursing units in 3 hospitals.

...read moreread less

186 citations

"Systematic Review: Process of Formi..." refers background or methods in this paper

...In service–academic partnerships, the primary expectation was that nurse educator acts as a bridge connecting nursing faculty and clinical environments, facilitating the theory–practice exchange (Lindahl et al., 2009; Moscato et al., 2007)....
[...]
...…(Boyer, 2002; Lindahl et al., 2009; Moscato et al., 2007); • improving the quality of students’ clinical experience (Boyer, 2002; Lindahl et al., 2009; Moscato et al., 2007; Turner, 2007); • finding ways of increasing the capacity for student intake despite existing limitations in clinical…...
[...]
...Other roles included decision making (Barger & Das, 2004; Barnett et al., 2008; Boyer, 2002; Fetherstonhaugh et al., 2008; Hunsberger et al., 2000; Lindahl et al., 2009; Moscato et al., 2007; Twedell & Frusti, 2008) on the following issues:...
[...]
...…decision making (Barger & Das, 2004; Barnett et al., 2008; Boyer, 2002; Fetherstonhaugh et al., 2008; Hunsberger et al., 2000; Lindahl et al., 2009; Moscato et al., 2007; Twedell & Frusti, 2008) on the following issues: • features of the joint program • implementation method and means of putting…...
[...]
...…intake despite existing limitations in clinical training spaces was also listed as a common objective (Barger & Das, 2004; Barnett et al., 2008; Murray, 2008); and • developing mechanisms for sharing resources between the institutions (Bartz & Dean-Baar, 2003; Moscato et al., 2007; Murray, 2008)....
[...]

Journal Article•DOI•

An overview of practice education models.

[...]

Claire Budgen¹, Lucia Gamroth²•Institutions (2)

University of British Columbia¹, University of Victoria²

01 Apr 2008-Nurse Education Today

TL;DR: Emerging developments in practice education are increased inter-professional and community-based practice education, and new partnerships among academic and practice organizations intended to alleviate model limitations, ease pressures from organizational contexts and respond to large integrated health care systems.

...read moreread less

160 citations

"Systematic Review: Process of Formi..." refers background in this paper

...Thus, preceptor recruitment and preceptor burnout problems are common (Budgen & Gamroth, 2008)....
[...]
...Since the early 1900s, models for academic service partnerships have appeared in the literature and have recently been reviewed (Budgen & Gamroth, 2008; Cronenwett, 2004)....
[...]
...Nursing practice education involves academic and health care organizations and thus is influenced by the contexts of both (Budgen & Gamroth, 2008)....
[...]
...Governments and professional organizations have called for new partnership between health care providers and academics to improve practice education, for the benefit of both students and patients (Budgen & Gamroth, 2008)....
[...]