Technical Legality: Law, Technology and Science Fiction
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the intersections of law and technology, referred to here as technical legality, are explored through taking science fiction seriously, and it is argued that reflection on technical legality reveals the mythic of modernity.Abstract:
This thesis concerns the intersections of law and technology, referred to here as
‘technical legality’. It argues that reflection on technical legality reveals the
mythic of modernity. The starting point for the argument is that the orthodox
framing of technology by law – the ‘law and technology enterprise’ – does not
comprehend its own speculative jurisdiction – that is, it fails to realise its oracle
orientation towards imagining the future. In this science fiction as the modern
West’s mythform, as the repository for projections of technological futures, is
recognised as both the law and technology enterprise’s wellspring and cipher.
What is offered in this thesis is a more thorough exploration of technical
legality through taking science fiction seriously. This seriousness results in two
implications for the understanding of technical legality. The first implication is
that the anxieties and fantasies that animate the calling forth of law by technology
become clearer. Science fiction operates as a window into the cultural milieu that
frames law-making moments. In locating law-making events – specifically the
making of the Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 (Cth) and the Motor Car
Act 1909 (Vic) – with the clone ‘canon’ in science fiction (specifically Star Trek:
Nemesis (2002)) and H.G. Wells’ scientific romances, what is offered is a much
richer understanding of how the cultural framing of technology becomes law than
that provided by the ‘pragmatic’ positivism of the law and technology enterprise.
The second implication arises from the excess that appears at the margins
of the richer analyses. Exploring technical legality through science fiction does
not remain within the epistemological frame. Each of the analyses gestures
towards something essential about technical legality. The law and technology
enterprise is grounded on the modern myth, which is also the myth of modernity – Frankenstein. It tells a story of monstrous technology, vulnerable humanity and
saving law. The analyses of the Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 (Cth) and
the Motor Car Act 1909 (Vic) show that this narrative is terrorised, that the saving
law turns out to be the monster in disguise; that the law called forth by technology
is in itself technological. In extended readings of two critically acclaimed science
fictions, Frank Herbert’s Dune cycle (1965–83) and the recent television series
Battlestar Galactica (2003–10), the essential commitments of technological law
are exposed. Dune as technical legality makes clear that technological law is truly
monstrous, for behind its positivism and sovereignty its essence is with the
alchemy of death and time. Battlestar Galactica as technical legality reduces
further the alchemical properties of technical law. Battlestar Galactica moves the
metaphysical highlight to the essence of technology and very nearly ends with
Heidegger’s demise of Being in ‘Enframing’: monstrous technology and
monstrous law reveal a humanity that cannot be saved. However, at the very
moment of this fall, Battlestar Galactica collapses the metaphysical frame,
affirming technological Being-in-the-world over empty ordering, life over death.
This free responsibility to becoming that emerges from Battlestar
Galactica reunites technical legality with the mythic of modernity. The modern
denial of myth, which allowed Frankenstein to narrate technical legality, has been
challenged. Free responsibility to becoming means a confidence with myths; it clears the way for the telling of new stories about law and technology.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Taking Rights Seriously
Alan R. White,Ronald Dworkin +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a judge in some representative American jurisdiction is assumed to accept the main uncontroversial constitutive and regulative rules of the law in his jurisdiction and to follow earlier decisions of their court or higher courts whose rationale, as l
Journal ArticleDOI
The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology
Journal ArticleDOI
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Precrime Never Pays! 'Law and Economics' in Minority Report
TL;DR: The authors examine the notion of precrime as articulated in the most recent Philip K. Dick film treatment (and Tom Cruise vehicle) Minority Report and argue that Minority Report literalises the fantasy that lies at the heart of Law and Economics.
Posted Content
Taking Law and _______ Really Seriously: Before, During and after “The Law”
Carrie Menkel-Meadow,Louis Michael Seidman,Paul Horwitz,Jack Schlegel,Chris Guthrie,Edward L. Rubin +5 more
TL;DR: This article reviewed the history of legal education from Langdellian formalism to legal realism, law and economics, critical legal studies, feminist and critical race theory, clinical education and social science.
Posted Content
Designing Tax Policy for the Digital Biosphere: How the Internet is Changing Tax Laws
TL;DR: In this paper, tax policy discussion with cyber-law theory is integrated with cyberlaw theory by developing a theoretical legal model called the "digital biosphere" to promote a better understanding of the relationship between tax laws and Internet transactions, where the role of tax law is to protect real world norms (e.g., the desire to maintain neutral tax treatment between traditional commerce and e-commerce) by aligning tax laws with the nature of the network without unduly interfering with emerging cyberspace norms (eg, transactional anonymity).