Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions: An Expository Note
Citations
3,391Â citations
1,560Â citations
1,248Â citations
1,225Â citations
Cites background or result from "Tests of Equality Between Sets of C..."
...Within the context of a Markov-switching model, one can distinguish between two important sources of stabilization in real GDP growth: a decline in the variance of shocks and a narrowing gap between growth rates during booms and recessions. Within the context of a linear model, one cannot distinguish between the two sources, and a narrowing gap between growth rates would show up as a decline in volatility. Empirical results suggest both sources of stabilization may not be ignored, even though we find stronger sample evidence in favor of a narrowing gap between growth rates during booms and recessions. In addition, the posterior mode of the break date turned out to be 1984:I. This is consistent with McConnell and Quiros (1999), who document a structural decline in the volatility of U....
[...]
...1 Goldfeld and Quandt (1973) introduced Markov-switching models for serially uncorrelated data, and Hamilton (1989) for serially correlated data. Kim (1994) extends the approach to general state-space models....
[...]
...1 Goldfeld and Quandt (1973) introduced Markov-switching models for serially uncorrelated data, and Hamilton (1989) for serially correlated data....
[...]
...economy toward more stabilization: a narrowing gap between the mean growth rates during booms and recessions and a decline in the volatility of real GDP growth. To further investigate the nature of the structural break in real GDP growth, we need to compare models (II), (III), and (IV). Model (II) with a structural break in the mean growth rates is most preferred, suggesting that a narrowing gap between the mean growth rates during booms and recessions is at least as important as a decline in the volatility of real GDP growth. 5 Notice that, within the context of a linear model, a narrowing gap between the mean growth rates will show up as a decline in the volatility. Thus, within the linear model, one may not be able to distinguish between the two sources of stabilization in real GDP growth. In figures 2.A, 3.A, and 4.A, the posterior distributions of the changepoint ( t) for models (II), (III), and (IV) are depicted against real GDP growth. In all three cases, the posterior mode of the changepoint is 1984.I, as in McConnell and Quiros (1999), even though the posterior distribution is more widely spread for model (II) than for the other models....
[...]
1,151Â citations
References
5,143Â citations
1,064Â citations
540Â citations
38Â citations