The archaeology of knowledge
Citations
36 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...(Dunlop, 2011, p. 178) Dann (1999, p. 162) argued that travel writing appeals to the ‘anti-tourist in all of us’ as the experiences of the authors are constructed as different to those that are available to ordinary people....
[...]
...(Dunlop, 2011, p. 176) In the articles, the traveller is embraced as a friend and is welcomed by the host community....
[...]
...…the notion that the traveller is gaining access to more authentic experiences, where the villagers trust in the traveller and give them ‘permission’ to visit a sacred site, where ‘hidden in caves’, the ‘pile of human skulls . . . remnants of a bygone era’ are witnessed (Dunlop, 2011, p. 178)....
[...]
...(Dunlop, 2011, p. 178) Difference is further emphasized in the articles by addressing the prominent touristic desire to escape the norm, describing alien-like landscapes....
[...]
...There are consistent references to getting off the beaten track and going to inaccessible or hard to reach destinations that are ‘remote’ (Dunlop, 2011, p. 178), ‘rare’ and ‘isolated’ (Hack, 2011, p. 75)....
[...]
36 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...This paper discussed the views of Edwin G. Boring, foremost historian of experimental psychology, and of Michel Fou- cault, usually seen as a postmodern constructivist and a critic of personal-biographical approaches to the history of science....
[...]
...I will not attempt a comprehensive review here, but rather discuss the views of two individuals with views at the two ends of the continuum: first, a sophisticated advocate of biography in the history of psychology, Edwin Boring, and second, a major postmodernist critic of personal-experiential approaches to the history of science, Michel Foucault....
[...]
...An extreme case of this is in the work of Michel Foucault (1926-1984) who has been enormously influential in the history and social studies of science. He and many others emphasize the ways in which science is socially, politically, economically, culturally, materially, and historically constructed. These are important perspectives, sometimes supported with exquisitely detailed social analysis of topics in the history of science (Galison, 1997; Shapin & Shaffer, 1989). They can open one’s eyes to processes previously not seen or attended to. Foucault often denied the relevance of the personal or psychological and said that what counts is the political aspect of his work. This view was expressed through most of his career with an unexpected change at the end. I will discuss a few elements of his work because he is one of the most influential postmodern historians and critics of the human sciences. In a 1969 interview about his book The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969), Foucault said he absolutely refuses the psychological and wants to focus on discourse itself without “looking underneath discourse for the thought of man” (Foucault, 1996, p....
[...]
...An extreme case of this is in the work of Michel Foucault (1926-1984) who has been enormously influential in the history and social studies of science....
[...]
...Michel Foucault....
[...]
36 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...The discourse on gender constructs “a regime of truth” on biological differences (Foucault 2002, 49) and assigns fixed behaviours and attitudes (Sjoberg and Tickner 2013; Wilcox 2007)....
[...]
...As Enloe argues (as quoted in Weldes 2006, 185), we must search for power in unconventional and unexpected places – e.g. the media – because power “is everywhere: not that it engulfs everything, but that it comes from everywhere” (Foucault 2002, 121–122)....
[...]
36 citations
36 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...vi-vii 256 Foucault, M. and C. Gordon (1980). Power-Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977....
[...]
References
6,407 citations
5,588 citations
4,480 citations
3,660 citations
1,126 citations