The archaeology of knowledge
Citations
70 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...Here, discourse is seen as the way in which speaking about things (and the selection of the things that can be spoken about) is structured to make certain issues relevant and to obscure others (cf. Foucault, 1974)....
[...]
...…issues that are highlighted today in discussion, i.e. first, the archaeology should be described (the current construction of issues that are highlighted for an area) and, second, the genealogy of a development (the way in which the issues in focus have developed historically) (cf. Foucault, 1974)....
[...]
70 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...Since Foucault’s conception of discourse relies heavily on empirical studies of the organization of knowledge through scientific disciplines, his work seems especially suitable for exploring professional expertise....
[...]
...Instead, our aim is to show how Foucault’s conception of discourse can enrich the neopragmatist approach, rendering it more useful in empirical research....
[...]
...If people want to open them, to use this sentence or that idea as a screwdriver or spanner to short-circuit, discredit systems of power, including eventually those from which my books have emerged . . . so much the better” (Foucault, cited in [19, p. 115]).4 We wish to contribute to information-seeking research with an interest in discourse by showing how discourses from a neopragmatist perspective can be studied as tools that users employ when they actively engage in information practices....
[...]
...The neopragmatist contribution provided here is better described as discourse oriented, since we in no way purport to explore and develop Foucault’s complex and nuanced discourse analytical methodology per se....
[...]
...This instrumental and nonfixed interpretation is supported by Foucault himself: “A book is made to be used in ways not defined by its writer....
[...]
69 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...…how to make immersion an effective learning experience (Bringle and Hatcher 2011; Chen 2002; Ogden 2006; Roberts et al. 2001), few have critically analysed the notion of immersion itself as a discourse – ‘practices that systematically form the objects of which they speak’ (Foucault 1972, 49)....
[...]
69 citations
Cites background or methods from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...Our research draws on language ideologies as an analytical framework in order to make sense of the parallels between the past and the present language regimes in policy and practice, and the implications of these regimes for the unequal distribution of linguistic power (Blackledge and Pavlenko 2002; Foucault 1972; Makoni and Pennycook 2007; Woolard and Schieffelin 1994)....
[...]
...…to make sense of the parallels between the past and the present language regimes in policy and practice, and the implications of these regimes for the unequal distribution of linguistic power (Blackledge and Pavlenko 2002; Foucault 1972; Makoni and Pennycook 2007; Woolard and Schieffelin 1994)....
[...]
69 citations
Cites background from "The archaeology of knowledge"
...According to Foucault (1972), influential groups do not obtain their positions through power monopolies, but rather through the establishment of regulated discourses....
[...]
References
6,407 citations
5,588 citations
4,480 citations
3,660 citations
1,126 citations