scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance

17 Apr 2015-
TL;DR: A "balanced scorecard" is developed, a new performance measurement system that gives top managers a fast but comprehensive view of the business and complements those financial measures with three sets of operational measures having to do with customer satisfaction, internal processes, and the organization's ability to learn and improve.
Abstract: Frustrated by the inadequacies of traditional performance measurement systems, some managers have abandoned financial measures like return on equity and earnings per share. "Make operational improvements and the numbers will follow," the argument goes. But managers do not want to choose between financial and operational measures. Executives want a balanced presentation of measures that allow them to view the company from several perspectives simultaneously. During a year-long research project with 12 companies at the leading edge of performance measurement, the authors developed a "balanced scorecard," a new performance measurement system that gives top managers a fast but comprehensive view of the business. The balanced scorecard includes financial measures that tell the results of actions already taken. And it complements those financial measures with three sets of operational measures having to do with customer satisfaction, internal processes, and the organization's ability to learn and improve--the activities that drive future financial performance. Managers can create a balanced scorecard by translating their company's strategy and mission statements into specific goals and measures. To create the part of the scorecard that focuses on the customer perspective, for example, executives at Electronic Circuits Inc. established general goals for customer performance: get standard products to market sooner, improve customers' time-to-market, become customers' supplier of choice through partnerships, and develop innovative products tailored to customer needs. Managers translated these elements of strategy into four specific goals and identified a measure for each.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that specific processes are required to continuously align the performance measurement system with strategy and when these processes are combined with a well defined model of strategic success, the measurement system can enhance the strategic management process by challenging the assumptions and the strategy itself.
Abstract: This paper addresses issues met when designing, implementing, using and continuously updating performance measurement systems in manufacturing companies. The paper develops, from theory, a framework for analysing the implementation of a performance measurement system and uses this framework to interpret three longitudinal case studies. The paper concludes that specific processes are required to continuously align the performance measurement system with strategy. When these processes are combined with a well defined model of strategic success, the measurement system can enhance the strategic management process by challenging the assumptions and the strategy itself.

1,130 citations


Cites background from "The balanced scorecard : measures t..."

  • ...…Fry and Cox 1989), encouraging minimisation of variance rather than continuous improvement (Johnson and Kaplan, 1987; Lynch and Cross, 1991), not being externally focused (Kaplan and Norton, 1992) and even for destroying the competitiveness of US manufacturing industry (Hayes and Abernathy, 1980)....

    [...]

  • ...Background literature Traditional performance measures, developed from costing and accounting systems, have been criticised for encouraging short termism (Banks and Wheelwright, 1979; Hayes and Garvin, 1982), lacking strategic focus (Skinner, 1974), encouraging local optimisation (Hall, 1983; Fry and Cox 1989), encouraging minimisation of variance rather than continuous improvement (Johnson and Kaplan, 1987; Lynch and Cross, 1991), not being externally focused (Kaplan and Norton, 1992) and even for destroying the competitiveness of US manufacturing industry (Hayes and Abernathy, 1980)....

    [...]

  • ...…1986; Fortuin, 1988; Keegan et al., 1989; Dixon et al., 1990; Bitton, 1990; Lynch and Cross, 1991; Maskell, 1989; Azzone et al., 1991; Wisner and Fawcett, 1991; Goold, 1991; Kaplan and Norton, 1992) and the literature is dominated by processes which answer the question `̀ what should we measure?''...

    [...]

  • ...There is now a strong consensus amongst authors that measures should be derived from strategy (e.g. Mintzberg, 1982; Globerson, 1985; Sink, 1986; Fortuin, 1988; Keegan et al., 1989; Dixon et al., 1990; Bitton, 1990; Lynch and Cross, 1991; Maskell, 1989; Azzone et al., 1991; Wisner and Fawcett, 1991; Goold, 1991; Kaplan and Norton, 1992) and the literature is dominated by processes which answer the question `̀ what should we measure?'' The importance of designing measures in a way which encourages behaviour which will support the strategy is absent from all but two processes (Bitton, 1990, Neely et al....

    [...]

  • ...…describe a pyramid of measures which integrates performance IJOPM 20,7 756 through the hierarchy of the organisation; Fitzgerald et al. (1991) distinguish between the results and their determinants and Kaplan and Norton (1992) between the four perspectives of their `̀ balanced scorecard''....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Balanced Scorecard of Kaplan and Norton as discussed by the authors is a management tool that supports the successful implementation of corporate strategies and it has been discussed and considered widely in both practice and research.
Abstract: The Balanced Scorecard of Kaplan and Norton is a management tool that supports the successful implementation of corporate strategies. It has been discussed and considered widely in both practice and research. By linking operational and non-financial corporate activities with causal chains to the firm's long-term strategy, the Balanced Scorecard supports the alignment and management of all corporate activities according to their strategic relevance. The Balanced Scorecard makes it possible to take into account non-monetary strategic success factors that significantly impact the economic success of a business. The Balanced Scorecard is thus a promising starting-point to also incorporate environmental and social aspects into the main management system of a firm. Sustainability management with the Balanced Scorecard helps to overcome the shortcomings of conventional approaches to environmental and social management systems by integrating the three pillars of sustainability into a single and overarching strategic management tool. After a brief discussion of the different possible forms of a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard the article takes a closer look at the process and steps of formulating a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard for a business unit. Before doing so, the basic conventional approach of the Balanced Scorecard and its suitability for sustainability management will be outlined in brief. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

1,090 citations


Cites background from "The balanced scorecard : measures t..."

  • ...The concept of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) was developed in the early 1990s as a new approach to performance measurement due to problems of short-termism and past orientation in management accounting (Kaplan and Norton, 1992)....

    [...]

  • ...As a reaction Kaplan and Norton suggested a new performance measurement approach that focuses on corporate strategy in four perspectives (Kaplan and Norton, 1992, 1997, 2001)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between organization size, product life cycle stage, market position, and balanced scorecard (BSC) usage and organizational performance and found that larger firms make more use of a BSC.
Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between organization size, product life‐cycle stage, market position, balanced scorecard (BSC) usage and organizational performance. Using financial and nonfinancial measures, the BSC appraises four dimensions of performance: customers, financial (or shareholders), learning and growth, and internal aspects. Based on a survey of 66 Australian manufacturing companies, the paper suggests that larger firms make more use of a BSC. In addition, firms that have a higher proportion of new products have a greater tendency to make use of measures related to new products. A firm's market position has not been found to be associated significantly with greater BSC usage. The paper also suggests that greater BSC usage is associated with improved performance, but this relationship does not depend significantly on organization size, product life cycle, or market position.

1,052 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which they classify under five research fields: consumer response to innovation, including attempts to measure consumer innovative-ness, models of new product growth, and recent ideas on network externalities.
Abstract: Innovation is one of the most important issues in business research today. It has been studied in many independent research traditions. Our understanding and study of innovation can benefit from an integrative review of these research traditions. In so doing, we identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which we classify under five research fields: - Consumer response to innovation, including attempts to measure consumer innovative-ness, models of new product growth, and recent ideas on network externalities - Organizations and innovation, which are increasingly important as product development becomes more complex and tools more effective but demanding - Market entry strategies, which includes recent research on technology revolution, exten-sive marketing science research on strategies for entry, and issues of portfolio manage-ment - Prescriptive techniques for product development processes, which have been transformed through global pressures, increasingly accurate customer input, web-based communica-tion for dispersed and global product design, and new tools for dealing with complexity over time and across product lines - Defending against market entry and capturing the rewards of innovating, which includes extensive marketing science research on strategies of defense, managing through metrics and rewards to entrants For each topic, we summarize key concepts and highlight research challenges. For pre-scriptive research topics, we also review current thinking and applications. For descriptive top-ics, we review key findings.

1,040 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider sustainable competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction as three probable mediators in the relationship between CSR and firm performance, and conclude that only reputation and competitive advantage mediate the relationship.

1,037 citations

Trending Questions (1)
What was wrong with other performance measurement systems before the balanced scorecard?

Traditional performance measurement systems lacked balance, focusing solely on financial metrics. The balanced scorecard addresses this by incorporating operational measures related to customer satisfaction, internal processes, and organizational learning.