scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

The classification problem for torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank

Simon Thomas1
08 Oct 2002-Journal of the American Mathematical Society (American Mathematical Society (AMS))-Vol. 16, Iss: 1, pp 233-258
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that the classification problem for the groups of rank n > 2 is intractible, and that there are 2' pairwise nonisomorphic groups up to isomorphism.
Abstract: In 1937, Baer [5] introduced the notion of the type of an element in a torsion-free abelian group and showed that this notion provided a complete invariant for the classification problem for torsion-free abelian groups of rank 1. Since then, despite the efforts of such mathematicians as Kurosh [23] and Malcev [25], no satisfactory system of complete invariants has been found for the torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank n > 2. So it is natural to ask whether the classification problem is genuinely more difficult for the groups of rank n > 2. Of course, if we wish to show that the classification problem for the groups of rank n > 2 is intractible, it is not enough merely to prove that there are 2' such groups up to isomorphism. For there are 2' pairwise nonisomorphic groups of rank 1, and we have already pointed out that Baer has given a satisfactory classification for this class of groups. In this paper, following Friedman-Stanley [11] and Hjorth-Kechris [15], we shall use the more sensitive notions of descriptive set theory to measure the complexity of the classification problem for the groups of rank n > 2. Recall that, up to isomorphism, the torsion-free abelian groups of rank n are exactly the additive subgroups of the n-dimensional vector space Qf which contain n linearly independent elements. Thus the collection of torsion-free abelian groups of rank 1 < r < n can be naturally identified with the set S(Qn) of all nontrivial additive subgroups of Qn. Notice that S(Qn) is a Borel subset of the Polish space ,p(Qn) of all subsets of Qn, and hence S(Qn) can be regarded as a standard Borel space; i.e. a Polish space equipped with its associated o-algebra of Borel subsets. (Here we are identifying p(Qn) with the space 2'Qn of all functions h: Qn {0, 1} equipped with the product topology.) Furthermore, the natural action of GLn(Q) on the vector space Qn induces a corresponding Borel action on S(Qn); and it is easily checked that if A, B C S(Qn), then A _V B iff there exists an element f E GLn(Q) such that p(A) = B. It follows that the isomorphism relation on S(Qn) is a countable Borel equivalence relation. (If X is a standard Borel space, then a Borel equivalence relation on X is an equivalence relation E C X2 which is a Borel subset of X2. The Borel equivalence relation E is said to be countable iff every E-equivalence class is countable.)

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
DOI
01 Jan 1970

670 citations

Book
01 Jul 2005
TL;DR: In this paper, a contribution to the theory of Borel equivalence relations and measure-preserving group actions is made, and it is shown that if the groups involved have a suitable notion of "boundary" (we make this precise with the definition of near hyperbolic), then one orbit-equivalence relation can only be reduced to another if there is some kind of algebraic resemblance between the product groups and coupling of the action.
Abstract: This Memoir is both a contribution to the theory of Borel equivalence relations, considered up to Borel reducibility, and measure preserving group actions considered up to orbit equivalence. Here E is said to be Borel reducible to F if there is a Borel function f with xEy if and only if f(x)Ff(y). Moreover, E is orbit equivalent to F if the respective measure spaces equipped with the extra structure provided by the equivalence relations are almost everywhere isomorphic. We consider product groups acting ergodically and by measure preserving transformations on standard Borel probability spaces. In general terms, the basic parts of the monograph show that if the groups involved have a suitable notion of “boundary" (we make this precise with the definition of near hyperbolic), then one orbit equivalence relation can only be Borel reduced to another if there is some kind of algebraic resemblance between the product groups and coupling of the action. This also has consequence for orbit equivalence. In the case that the original equivalence relations do not have non-trivial almost invariant sets, the techniques lead to relative ergodicity results. An equivalence relation E is said to be relatively ergodic to F if any f with xEy⇒ f(x)Ff(y) has [f(x)]F constant almost everywhere. This underlying collection of lemmas and structural theorems is employed in a number of different ways. One of the most pressing concerns was to give completely self-contained proofs of results which had previously only been obtained using Zimmer's superrigidity theory. We present "elementary proofs" that there are incomparable countable Borel equivalence relations (Adams-Kechris), inclusion does not imply reducibility (Adams), and (n + 1)E is not necessarily reducible to nE (Thomas). In the later parts of the paper we give applications of the theory to specific cases of product groups. In particular, we catalog the actions of products of the free group and obtain additional rigidity theorems and relative ergodicity results in this context. There is a rather long series of appendices, whose primary goal is to give the reader a comprehensive account of the basic techniques. But included here are also some new results. For instance, we show that the Furstenberg-Zimmer lemma on cocycles from amenable groups fails with respect to Baire category, and use this to answer a question of Weiss. We also present a different proof that F_2 has the Haagerup approximation property.

89 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that the isomorphism problem for torsion-free Abelian groups is as complicated as any isomorphic problem in terms of the analytical hierarchy, namely 1 complete.

70 citations

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: A survey of Borel equivalence relations under Borel reducibility can be found in this article, where Silver's theorem on the number of equivalence classes of a co-analytic equivalence relation and the landmark Harrington-Kechris-Louveau dichotomy theorem are discussed.
Abstract: This article surveys the rapidly evolving area of Borel equivalence relations under the ordering of Borel reducibility. Although the field is now considered part of descriptive set theory, it traces its origins back to areas entirely outside logic. In fact this survey starts with Silver’s theorem on the number of equivalence classes of a co-analytic equivalence relation and the landmark Harrington-Kechris-Louveau dichotomy theorem, but also takes care to sketch some of the prehistory of the subject, going back to the roots in ergodic theory, dynamics, group theory, and functional analysis.

43 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Marcin Sabok1
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the isomorphism problem for separable (simple, AI) C*-algebras is complete in the class of orbit equivalence relations.
Abstract: This paper studies the descriptive set-theoretical complexity of the isomorphism problem for separable C*-algebras. We prove that the isomorphism problem for separable (simple, AI) C*-algebras is complete in the class of orbit equivalence relations. This means that any isomorphism problem arising from a continuous action of a separable completely metrizable group can be reduced to the isomorphism of simple, separable AI C*-algebras.

37 citations


Cites background from "The classification problem for tors..."

  • ...Descriptive complexity theory has applications to various classification problems arising in many areas and it has enjoyed spectacular successes, for instance the striking result of Thomas [65] on the relative complexity of isomorphism problems for torsion-free abelian groups or the results of Foreman, Rudolph and Weiss [28] on the conjugacy problem in ergodic theory....

    [...]

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1987
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a largely balanced approach, which combines many elements of the different traditions of the subject, and includes a wide variety of examples, exercises, and applications, in order to illustrate the general concepts and results of the theory.
Abstract: Descriptive set theory has been one of the main areas of research in set theory for almost a century. This text attempts to present a largely balanced approach, which combines many elements of the different traditions of the subject. It includes a wide variety of examples, exercises (over 400), and applications, in order to illustrate the general concepts and results of the theory. This text provides a first basic course in classical descriptive set theory and covers material with which mathematicians interested in the subject for its own sake or those that wish to use it in their field should be familiar. Over the years, researchers in diverse areas of mathematics, such as logic and set theory, analysis, topology, probability theory, etc., have brought to the subject of descriptive set theory their own intuitions, concepts, terminology and notation.

3,340 citations

Book
01 Jan 1991
TL;DR: Conventions and notation background material from algebraic geometry general notions associated with algebraic groups homogeneous spaces solvable groups Borel subgroups reductive groups rationality questions are discussed in this paper.
Abstract: Conventions and notation background material from algebraic geometry general notions associated with algebraic groups homogeneous spaces solvable groups Borel subgroups reductive groups rationality questions.

2,919 citations

Book
01 Jan 1962
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a group theory representation and modular representation for algebraic number theory, including Semi-Semi-Simple Rings and Group Algebras, including Frobenius Algebraic numbers.
Abstract: Notation Background from Group Theory Representations and Modules Algebraic Number Theory Semi-Simple Rings and Group Algebras Group Characters Induced Characters Induced Representation Non-Semi-Simple Rings Frobenius Algebras Splitting Fields and Separable Algebras Integral Representations Modular Representations Index

2,778 citations

Book
01 Jan 1970

2,613 citations