The clinical interview and psychiatric diagnosis: have they a future in psychiatric practice?
Citations
76,181 citations
70,887 citations
10 citations
Cites background from "The clinical interview and psychiat..."
...Roth and other old age psychiatrists believed the adoption of rating scales would increase their authority by overcoming the fact that ‘psychiatrists may differ widely from one another in the diagnostic judgement they make in identical cases’ (Roth, 1967: 428)....
[...]
...…that we cannot account for the development and popularity of rating scales in Britain without appreciating how the promise of ‘more detailed and quantifiable information’ met the political desire for rationalization and efficiency in the welfare state (Roth, 1967: 428; Sturdy and Cooter, 1998)....
[...]
...…concerns that over-reliance on standardized and impersonal methods would replace the need for trained experts, which highlights an underlying tension in efforts to promote ‘greater rigour and discipline’ in psychiatry, as in medicine and science more generally (Roth, 1967: 427; Lawrence, 1985)....
[...]
...…of drug treatments, prompting the development of more thorough tained that rating scales never provided automatic diagnosis and stressed the importance of ‘clinical judgements’ in interpreting both the symptoms exhibited by patients and the numerical data that scales generated (Roth, 1967: 431)....
[...]
9 citations
Cites background from "The clinical interview and psychiat..."
...In his paper on problems of psychiatric interviewing and diagnosis, Roth (1967) has given an excellent survey of the present situation. In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in the diagnostic decision, and psychiatrists have, as a natural consequence, tried to deliminate the operational conditions for the description of the mental state. This description is a fundamental part of the psychiatric record, and it is based on information obtained in a reasonably clear situation - the clinical examination. It has also proved possible to make a consensus of observation and usage (Silbermann (1971), Feighner et al. (1972) and Scharfetter ( 1971) ) . Many other forms of information from the record are necessary for the diagnostic decision (MeZZergBrd (1971) ), but it is difficult to evaluate how...
[...]
...In his paper on problems of psychiatric interviewing and diagnosis, Roth (1967) has given an excellent survey of the present situation....
[...]
...In his paper on problems of psychiatric interviewing and diagnosis, Roth (1967) has given an excellent survey of the present situation. In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in the diagnostic decision, and psychiatrists have, as a natural consequence, tried to deliminate the operational conditions for the description of the mental state. This description is a fundamental part of the psychiatric record, and it is based on information obtained in a reasonably clear situation - the clinical examination. It has also proved possible to make a consensus of observation and usage (Silbermann (1971), Feighner et al....
[...]
...In his paper on problems of psychiatric interviewing and diagnosis, Roth (1967) has given an excellent survey of the present situation. In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in the diagnostic decision, and psychiatrists have, as a natural consequence, tried to deliminate the operational conditions for the description of the mental state. This description is a fundamental part of the psychiatric record, and it is based on information obtained in a reasonably clear situation - the clinical examination. It has also proved possible to make a consensus of observation and usage (Silbermann (1971), Feighner et al. (1972) and Scharfetter ( 1971) ) ....
[...]
8 citations
Cites methods from "The clinical interview and psychiat..."
...The interviews were open, non-structured interviews which complied with the rules of a clinimetrically valid interview as stipulated by Roth (17)....
[...]
References
29,488 citations
3,143 citations
611 citations
344 citations