scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model of anorexia nervosa revisited: a summary of the evidence for cognitive, socio-emotional and interpersonal predisposing and perpetuating factors

Janet Treasure, +1 more
- 15 Apr 2013 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 1, pp 13-13
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Cognitive-Interpersonal Maintenance Model maintenance model for anorexia nervosa is supported by accumulating evidence and some of the traits are inherited vulnerabilities and are present in family members.
Abstract
To describe the evidence base relating to the Cognitive-Interpersonal Maintenance Model for anorexia nervosa (AN). A Cognitive-Interpersonal Maintenance Model maintenance model for anorexia nervosa was described in 2006. This model proposed that cognitive, socio-emotional and interpersonal elements acted together to both cause and maintain eating disorders. A review of the empirical literature relating to the key constructs of the model (cognitive, socio-emotional, interpersonal) risk and maintaining factors for anorexia nervosa was conducted. Set shifting and weak central coherence (associated with obsessive compulsive traits) have been widely studied. There is some evidence to suggest that a strong eye for detail and weak set shifting are inherited vulnerabilities to AN. Set shifting and global integration are impaired in the ill state and contribute to weak central coherence. In addition, there are wide-ranging impairments in socio-emotional processing including: an automatic bias in attention towards critical and domineering faces and away from compassionate faces; impaired signalling of, interpretation and regulation of emotions. Difficulties in social cognition may in part be a consequence of starvation but inherited vulnerabilities may also contribute to these traits. The shared familial traits may accentuate family members’ tendency to react to the frustrating and frightening symptoms of AN with high expressed emotion (criticism, hostility, overprotection), and inadvertently perpetuate the problem. The cognitive interpersonal model is supported by accumulating evidence. The model is complex in that cognitive and socio-emotional factors both predispose to the illness and are exaggerated in the ill state. Furthermore, some of the traits are inherited vulnerabilities and are present in family members. The clinical formulations from the model are described as are new possibilities for targeted treatment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis: PREDICTORS OF TREATMENT OUTCOME IN INDIVIDUALS WITH EATING DISORDERS

TL;DR: The most robust predictor of outcome at both end of treatment (EoT) and follow-up was the meditational mechanism of greater symptom change early during treatment, and drop-out was predicted by more binge/purge behaviors and lower motivation to recover.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

TL;DR: The most robust predictor of outcome at both end of treatment (EoT) and follow-up was the meditational mechanism of greater symptom change early during treatment, and drop-out was predicted by more binge/purge behaviors and lower motivation to recover.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review and meta-analysis of ‘Systems for Social Processes’ in eating disorders

TL;DR: The facets of social processing in ED according to the NIMH RDoC 'Systems for Social Processes' framework are reviewed, showing evidence that people with ED had attachment insecurity, and less evidence for problems with production and reception of non-facial communication, animacy and action.
Journal ArticleDOI

Has the time come for a staging model to map the course of eating disorders from high risk to severe enduring illness? An examination of the evidence.

TL;DR: Whether high‐risk markers and prodromal features presenting in childhood and adolescence can later transition to the full manifestation of the illness in early adulthood, and whether over time, the illness can be described as becoming severe and enduring, often resistant to treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alexithymia in eating disorders: Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale.

TL;DR: Across the spectrum of eating disorders, individuals report having difficulties recognising or describing their emotions, and research to develop and evaluate treatments and clinician-administered assessments of alexithymia is warranted.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance

TL;DR: The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.
Book

Anorexia Nervosa

Joan Gomez, +1 more
Journal ArticleDOI

Oxytocin and vasopressin in the human brain: social neuropeptides for translational medicine

TL;DR: OXT and AVP are emerging as targets for novel treatment approaches — particularly in synergistic combination with psychotherapy — for mental disorders characterized by social dysfunction, such as autism, social anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evolution in the Social Brain

TL;DR: It is suggested that it may have been the particular demands of the more intense forms of pairbonding that was the critical factor that triggered this evolutionary development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coming to Terms With Risk Factors for Eating Disorders: Application of Risk Terminology and Suggestions for a General Taxonomy

TL;DR: Common risk factors from longitudinal and cross-sectional studies were gender, ethnicity, early childhood eating and gastrointestinal problems, elevated weight and shape concerns, negative self-evaluation, sexual abuse and other adverse experiences, and general psychiatric morbidity.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How does the cognitive model explain OCD?

The provided paper does not discuss the cognitive model of OCD.