scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition

01 Jan 2013-
Abstract: It's not surprisingly when entering this site to get the book. One of the popular books now is the the design of everyday things revised and expanded edition. You may be confused because you can't find the book in the book store around your city. Commonly, the popular book will be sold quickly. And when you have found the store to buy the book, it will be so hurt when you run out of it. This is why, searching for this popular book in this website will give you benefit. You will not run out of this book.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work considers whether wearable technology can become a valuable asset for health care and investigates the role that smartwatches can play in this process.
Abstract: Lukasz Piwek and colleagues consider whether wearable technology can become a valuable asset for health care.

788 citations


Cites background from "The Design of Everyday Things: Revi..."

  • ...Poor implementation of user experience principles [16] alongside the ad hoc design of user interfaces stems in part from the rapid nature of development, which may also explain the lack of randomised trials....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An extensive review on human–robot collaboration in industrial environment is provided, with specific focus on issues related to physical and cognitive interaction, and the commercially available solutions are presented.

632 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
21 Apr 2018
TL;DR: This work investigates how HCI researchers can help to develop accountable systems by performing a literature analysis of 289 core papers on explanations and explaina-ble systems, as well as 12,412 citing papers.
Abstract: Advances in artificial intelligence, sensors and big data management have far-reaching societal impacts. As these systems augment our everyday lives, it becomes increasing-ly important for people to understand them and remain in control. We investigate how HCI researchers can help to develop accountable systems by performing a literature analysis of 289 core papers on explanations and explaina-ble systems, as well as 12,412 citing papers. Using topic modeling, co-occurrence and network analysis, we mapped the research space from diverse domains, such as algorith-mic accountability, interpretable machine learning, context-awareness, cognitive psychology, and software learnability. We reveal fading and burgeoning trends in explainable systems, and identify domains that are closely connected or mostly isolated. The time is ripe for the HCI community to ensure that the powerful new autonomous systems have intelligible interfaces built-in. From our results, we propose several implications and directions for future research to-wards this goal.

539 citations


Cites background from "The Design of Everyday Things: Revi..."

  • ...a core concepts within HCI [138], that we can see as part of our vocabulary to discuss challenges in the use of interactive technology (i....

    [...]

  • ..., the need for appropriate feedback [138])....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
18 Mar 2015
TL;DR: An empirical evaluation shows that Explanatory Debugging increased participants' understanding of the learning system by 52% and allowed participants to correct its mistakes up to twice as efficiently as participants using a traditional learning system.
Abstract: How can end users efficiently influence the predictions that machine learning systems make on their behalf? This paper presents Explanatory Debugging, an approach in which the system explains to users how it made each of its predictions, and the user then explains any necessary corrections back to the learning system. We present the principles underlying this approach and a prototype instantiating it. An empirical evaluation shows that Explanatory Debugging increased participants' understanding of the learning system by 52% and allowed participants to correct its mistakes up to twice as efficiently as participants using a traditional learning system.

445 citations

BookDOI
15 Jul 2015
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (EES) report, which synthesizes and integrates the available research to provide guidance on assembling the science team; leadership, education and professional development for science teams and groups.
Abstract: The past half-century has witnessed a dramatic increase in the scale and complexity of scientific research. The growing scale of science has been accompanied by a shift toward collaborative research, referred to as “team science.“ Scientific research is increasingly conducted by small teams and larger groups rather than individual investigators, but the challenges of collaboration can slow these teams' progress in achieving their scientific goals. How does a team-based approach work, and how can universities and research institutions support teams? Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science synthesizes and integrates the available research to provide guidance on assembling the science team; leadership, education and professional development for science teams and groups. It also examines institutional and organizational structures and policies to support science teams and identifies areas where further research is needed to help science teams and groups achieve their scientific and translational goals. This report offers major public policy recommendations for science research agencies and policymakers, as well as recommendations for individual scientists, disciplinary associations, and research universities. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science will be of interest to university research administrators, team science leaders, science faculty, and graduate and postdoctoral students.

402 citations