scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

The Determination of Galois Groups

13 Jan 1973-Mathematics of Computation (American Mathematical Society (AMS))-Vol. 27, Iss: 124, pp 981-996
TL;DR: In this article, a technique for computing the Galois groups of polynomials with integer coefficients is described, which can be used to determine the order of the polynomial roots.
Abstract: A technique is described for the nontentative computer determination of the Galois groups of irreducible polynomials with integer coefficients. The technique for a given polynomial involves finding high-precision approximations to the roots of the poly- nomial, and fixing an ordering for these roots. The roots are then used to create resolvent polynomials of relatively small degree, the linear factors of which determine new orderings for the roots. Sequences of these resolvents isolate the Galois group of the polynomial. Machine implementation of the technique requires the use of multiple-precision integer and multiple-precision real and complex floating-point arithmetic. Using this technique, the writer has developed programs for the determination of the Galois groups of polynomials of degree N _ 7. Two exemplary calculations are given. Introduction. The existence of an algorithm for the determination of Galois groups is nothing new; indeed, the original definition of the Galois group contained, at least implicitly, a technique for its determination, and this technique has been described explicitly by many authors (cf. van der Waerden (8, p. 189)). These sources show that the problem of finding the Galois group of a polynomial p(x) of degree n over a given field K can be reduced to the problem of factoring over K a polynomial of degree n! whose coefficients are symmetric functions of the roots of p(x). In principle, therefore, whenever we have a factoring algorithm over K, we also have a Galois group algorithm. In particular, since Kronecker has described a factoring algorithm for polynomials with rational coefficients, the problem of determining the Galois groups of such polynomials is solved in principle. It is obvious, however, that a procedure which requires the factorization of a polynomial of degree n! is not suited to the uses of mortal men. In the next sections we describe a practical and relatively simple procedure which has been used to develop programs for polynomials of degrees 3 through 7. Restrictions. The algorithm to be described will apply only to irreducible monic polynomials with integer coefficients. Since any polynomial with rational coefficients can easily be transformed into a monic polynomial with integer coefficients equivalent with respect to its Galois group, these latter two adjectives create no genuine restric- tion. The irreducibility restriction is genuine, however. For suppose p(x) = p,(x)p2(x), and suppose K1 and K2 are the splitting fields of P, and p2, respectively. If K1 n K2 = the rationals, then the Galois group of p(x) is the direct sum of the Galois groups of p,(x) and p2(x), and there is no difficulty. If, on the other hand, K1 n K2 is larger than the rationals, then the group of p(x) is not easily determined from those of p,(x) and p2(x) without explicit knowledge of the relations which exist between the

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1993
TL;DR: The first seven chapters guide readers to the heart of current research in computational algebraic number theory, including recent algorithms for computing class groups and units, as well as elliptic curve computations, while the last three chapters survey factoring and primality testing methods.
Abstract: A description of 148 algorithms fundamental to number-theoretic computations, in particular for computations related to algebraic number theory, elliptic curves, primality testing and factoring. The first seven chapters guide readers to the heart of current research in computational algebraic number theory, including recent algorithms for computing class groups and units, as well as elliptic curve computations, while the last three chapters survey factoring and primality testing methods, including a detailed description of the number field sieve algorithm. The whole is rounded off with a description of available computer packages and some useful tables, backed by numerous exercises. Written by an authority in the field, and one with great practical and teaching experience, this is certain to become the standard and indispensable reference on the subject.

2,842 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Galoois methods are applied to certain fundamental geometric optimization problems whose exact computational complexity has been an open problem for a long time and show that the classic Weber problem, along with the line-restricted Weber problem and itsthree-dimensional version are in general not solvable by radicals over the field of rationals.
Abstract: In this paper we apply Galois methods to certain fundamentalgeometric optimization problems whose exact computational complexity has been an open problem for a long time. In particular we show that the classic Weber problem, along with theline-restricted Weber problem and itsthree-dimensional version are in general not solvable by radicals over the field of rationals. One direct consequence of these results is that for these geometric optimization problems there existsno exact algorithm under models of computation where the root of an algebraic equation is obtained using arithmetic operations and the extraction ofkth roots. This leaves only numerical or symbolic approximations to the solutions, where the complexity of the approximations is shown to be primarily a function of the algebraic degree of the optimum solution point.

240 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that the study of algorithms not only increases the understanding of algebraic number fields but also stimulates the curiosity about them.
Abstract: In this paper we discuss the basic problems of algorithmic algebraic number theory. The emphasis is on aspects that are of interest from a purely mathematical point of view, and practical issues are largely disregarded. We describe what has been done and, more importantly, what remains to be done in the urea. We hope to show that the study of algorithms not only increases our understanding of algebraic number fields but also stimulates our curiosity about them

177 citations


Cites background from "The Determination of Galois Groups"

  • ...fficult. Resolvent polynomials, such as X2 − ∆ f in the proof of Theorem 3.6, play a much more important role in practical algorithms for determining Galois groups than in known complexity results (see [69, 26]). Problem 3.8. Is there a way to exploit resolvent polynomials to obtain complexity results for varying n? The results that we have treated so far are more algebraic than arithmetic in nature, the on...

    [...]

  • ...ois groups is not considered to be well solved, even though the algorithms that are actually used nowadays always require n to be bounded—in fact, each value of n typically has its own algorithm (cf. [69, 26]), which does not follow the crude approach outlined above. Corollary 3.3. There is a good algorithm that given K and f decides whether G is abelian, and determines G if G is abelian and f is irreduci...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the transitive groups of degree up to eleven were studied and a transitive transitive group up to 11 was proposed for algebraic geometry, which is the case in this paper.
Abstract: (1983). The transitive groups of degree up to eleven. Communications in Algebra: Vol. 11, No. 8, pp. 863-911.

168 citations

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1955
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define the notion of permutation groups as a group of linear substitutions, and show that a group can be represented as a permutation-group.
Abstract: Preface to the second edition Preface to the first edition 1. On permutations 2. The definition of a group 3. On the simpler properties of a group which are independent of its mode of representation 4. Further properties of a group which are independent of its mode of representation 5. On the composition-series of a group 6. On the isomorphism of a group within itself 7. On Abelian groups 8. On groups whose orders are the powers of primes 9. On Sylow's theorem 10. On permutation-groups: transitive and intransitive groups 11. On permutation-groups: transitivity and primitivity 12. On the representation of a group of finite order as a permutation-group 13. On groups of linear substitutions 14. On the representation of a group of finite order as a group of linear substitutions 15. On group-characteristics 16. Some applications of the theory of groups of linear substitutions and of group-characteristics 17. On the invariants of groups of linear substitutions 18. On the graphical representation of a group 19. On the graphical representation of groups 20. On congruence groups Notes Index of technical terms Index of authors quoted General index.

1,176 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In particular, for the Bernoulli polynomials, this paper showed that B2m(x) is irreducible for 2m = (k p + A + 1) (p − IX A < p).
Abstract: [2], [3] that E5(x) = Ix — -^ (x — χ — l), so at least one example is known of an \ Ι Euler polynomial with a multiple factor. Also, it has been proven by Carlitz [2] that Ep(x)l ix — -^\ is irreducible for p a prime == 3 (mod 4), and that E2p(x)lx(x — 1) has an irreducible factor of degree at least p — l for p a prime. In the case of the Bernoulli polynomials, Inkeri [8] has shown that the only Bn(x), n ^> 3, possessing rational roots are B2m+l(x) for m ̂ l, which have the well-known factors χ (x — -^-) (x — 1). Other than these, there have until now been no non-trivial factors of any degree known for any Bn(x). l 1\ On the other hand, Carlitz [2] has shown that B2m+l(x)jx [x — -^ (x — 1) for \ A/ 2m + l — k(p — 1) + l? A fS p, p an odd prime, must possess an irreducible factor of degree at least 2m + l — P· In the same paper it is also proven that B2m(x) is irreducible for 2m = k (p — 1) ,̂ p a prime, t ̂ 0 and l <Ξ k < p. More recently McCarthy [10] has shown that B2m(x) is irreducible for 2m = (k p + A + 1) (p — IX A < p. In our investigation we will first develop various properties of the Euler polynomials. This will then be followed by a parallel development for the Bernoulli polynomials, which is made possible in large part by a rather surprising modular relationship between the two sets of polynomials. In particular, for the Euler polynomials we will determine their rational and multiple roots, s well s the roots that lie on the lines x = 0, -^ , and l in the complex plane. We will also obtain partial formulas for their discriminants, the manner in which

48 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

5 citations


"The Determination of Galois Groups" refers methods in this paper

  • ...Information used in constructing the tables and trees presented here has been gleaned from [1], [2], [3], [4]....

    [...]