scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The diagnosis and misdiagnosis of achalasia: a study of 25 consecutive patients

Seth Rosenzweig, +1 more
- 01 Apr 1989 - 
- Vol. 11, Iss: 2, pp 147-153
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Achalasia remains an elusive diagnosis in current practice, and errors in diagnosis are related to delay in obtaining appropriate studies or misinterpretation of such studies, and this delay leads to persistent symptoms and ineffective and/or inappropriate therapies.
Abstract
An impression that achalasia remains an elusive diagnosis led us to review our recent experience From August 1, 1985 to March 31, 1987, we saw 25 patients with "previously untreated" achalasia for consultation and/or treatment Data was extracted from review of their records Achalasia was the initial diagnosis in only 12 patients The others were given diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux (4), presbyesophagus (2), esophageal spasm (2), psychiatric disorders (2), and combination of various disorders (3) In the latter patients, various diagnostic studies were either inappropriately delayed or misinterpreted, so that incorrect diagnoses were given Errors in diagnosis led to further inappropriate testing and therapies We conclude that: (a) achalasia remains an elusive diagnosis in current practice, (b) errors in diagnosis are related to delay in obtaining appropriate studies or misinterpretation of such studies, and (c) this delay leads to persistent symptoms and ineffective and/or inappropriate therapies

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis of achalasia in Edinburgh.

TL;DR: Because endoscopy is frequently normal and the diagnosis is often not made by radiology, manometric investigation is necessary if the condition is to be recognised and treated at an early stage.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pseudoachalasia: a case series and analysis of the literature.

TL;DR: The diagnosis of pseudoachalasia is difficult to establish by conventional diagnostic measures and the main distinguishing feature of secondary versus primary achalasia is the complete reversal of pathologic motor phenomena following successful therapy of the underlying disorder.
Book ChapterDOI

Motility disorders of the esophagus.

TL;DR: Manometric and clinical correlations in recent years have clarified the role of Radiographic evaluation of the esophagus using multiple single swallows of barium in evaluating normal and abnormal esophageal function.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia.

TL;DR: Taking a careful history is vital for the evaluation of dysphagia, and the likely underlying pathophysiologic process and anatomic site of the problem in most patients is crucial for determining whether subsequently detected radiographic or endoscopic 'anomalies' are relevant or incidental.
Journal ArticleDOI

Minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and stomach

TL;DR: Laroscopic (and thoracoscopic) approaches for gastroesophageal reflux disease appear to have excellent operative and short-term follow-up results and results should be scrutinized and compared with open operation before proclaiming the benefits of a minimally invasive approach.
Related Papers (5)