The Ecology of Arsenic
09 May 2003-Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)-Vol. 300, Iss: 5621, pp 939-944
TL;DR: This work reviews what is known about arsenic-metabolizing bacteria and their potential impact on speciation and mobilization of arsenic in nature and investigates their role in aquifers.
Abstract: Arsenic is a metalloid whose name conjures up images of murder. Nonetheless, certain prokaryotes use arsenic oxyanions for energy generation, either by oxidizing arsenite or by respiring arsenate. These microbes are phylogenetically diverse and occur in a wide range of habitats. Arsenic cycling may take place in the absence of oxygen and can contribute to organic matter oxidation. In aquifers, these microbial reactions may mobilize arsenic from the solid to the aqueous phase, resulting in contaminated drinking water. Here we review what is known about arsenic-metabolizing bacteria and their potential impact on speciation and mobilization of arsenic in nature.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: It is shown that anaerobic metal-reducing bacteria can play a key role in the mobilization of arsenic in sediments collected from a contaminated aquifer in West Bengal and that, for the sediments in this study, arsenic release took place after Fe(iii) reduction, rather than occurring simultaneously.
Abstract: The contamination of ground waters, abstracted for drinking and irrigation, by sediment-derived arsenic threatens the health of tens of millions of people worldwide, most notably in Bangladesh and West Bengal1,2,3. Despite the calamitous effects on human health arising from the extensive use of arsenic-enriched ground waters in these regions, the mechanisms of arsenic release from sediments remain poorly characterized and are topics of intense international debate4,5,6,7,8. We use a microscosm-based approach to investigate these mechanisms: techniques of microbiology and molecular ecology are used in combination with aqueous and solid phase speciation analysis of arsenic. Here we show that anaerobic metal-reducing bacteria can play a key role in the mobilization of arsenic in sediments collected from a contaminated aquifer in West Bengal. We also show that, for the sediments in this study, arsenic release took place after Fe(iii) reduction, rather than occurring simultaneously. Identification of the critical factors controlling the biogeochemical cycling of arsenic is one important contribution to fully informing the development of effective strategies to manage these and other similar arsenic-rich ground waters worldwide.
1,153 citations
TL;DR: The effects of competing anions revealed that HCO3-, H4SiO4(0), and H2PO4(2-) are potential interfering agents in the As(V) adsorption reaction.
Abstract: The removal of As(V), one of the most poisonous groundwater pollutants, by synthetic nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) was studied Batch experiments were performed to investigate the influence of pH, adsorption kinetics, sorption mechanism, and anionic effects Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Mossbauer spectroscopy were used to characterize the particle size, surface morphology, and corrosion layer formation on pristine NZVI and As(V)-treated NZVI The HR-TEM study of pristine NZVI showed a core-shell-like structure, where more than 90% of the nanoparticles were under 30 nm in diameter Mossbauer spectroscopy further confirmed its structure in which 19% were in zero-valent state with a coat of 81% iron oxides The XRD results showed that As(V)-treated NZVI was gradually converted into magnetite/maghemite corrosion products over 90 days The XPS study confirmed that 25% As(V) was reduced to As(III) by NZVI after 90 days As(V) adsorption kinetics were rapid and occurred within minutes following a pseudo-first-order rate expression with observed reaction rate constants (Kobs) of 002-071 min(-1) at various NZVI concentrations Laser light scattering analysis confirmed that NZVI-As(V) forms an inner-sphere surface complexation The effects of competing anions revealed that HCO3-, H4SiO4(0), and H2PO4(2-) are potential interfering agents in the As(V) adsorption reaction Our results suggest that NZVI is a suitable candidate for As(V) remediation
684 citations
TL;DR: In this article, mesoprous alumina (MA) with a wide surface area (307 m2/g) and uniform pore size (3.5 nm) was prepared, and a spongelike interlinked pore system was developed through a post-hydrolysis method.
Abstract: The health threat of arsenic is well-known, and the U.S. EPA recommends the maximum contaminant level to be 0.01 ppm or less for arsenic in drinking water. Therefore, advanced treatment processes are needed for finished water to meet the required regulations. Adsorption is considered to be a less expensive procedure that is safer to handle than precipitation, ion exchange, and membrane filtration. Activated alumina (AA) is the most commonly used adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions. However, conventional porous solids including AA have ill-defined pore structures and, typically, low adsorption capacities and act in a kinetically slow manner. An ideal adsorbent should have uniformly accessible pores, an interlinked pore system, a high surface area, and physical and/or chemical stability. To meet this requirement, mesoprous alumina (MA) with a wide surface area (307 m2/g) and uniform pore size (3.5 nm) was prepared, and a spongelike interlinked pore system was developed through a post-hydrolysis method. The resulting MA was insoluble and stable within the range of pH 3-7. The maximum uptake of As(V) by MA was found to be 7 times higher [121 mg of As(V)/g and 47 mg of As(III)/ g] than that of conventional AA, and the kinetics of adsorption were also rapid with complete adsorption in less than 5 h as compared to the conventional AA (about 2 d to reach half of the equilibrium value). A desorption study using sodium hydroxide solutions (0.01-1 M) was conducted, and 0.05 M NaOH was found to be the most suitable desorption agent. More than 85% of the arsenic adsorbed to the MA was desorbed in less than 1 h. Several other activated aluminas with different pore properties were also tested. The results show that the surface area of the adsorbents does not greatly influence on the adsorption capacity. In fact, the key factor is a uniform pore size and an interlinked pore system. These studies show that MA with a wide surface area, uniform pore size, and interlinked pore system can be used as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of arsenic.
592 citations
TL;DR: Although the adverse health effects arising from exposure to arsenic have been well-recognized, the mechanism(s) of action responsible for the diverse range of health effects are complicated and poorly understood.
Abstract: Arsenic is a trace element found in the earth’s crust at an average concentration of ∼5 μg/g (ppm). Although its relative abundance in the earth’s crust is about 54th, arsenic can become concentrated in some parts of the world because of natural mineralization. Arsenic is a component of 245 minerals, associated most frequently with other metals such as copper, gold, lead, and zinc in sulfidic ores.1−3 When disturbed by natural processes, such as weathering, biological activity, and volcanic eruption, arsenic may be released into the environment. Anthropogenic activities, such as combustion of fossil fuels, mining, ore smelting, and well drilling, also mobilize and introduce arsenic into the environment.
Chronic exposure to arsenic from groundwater has been recognized to cause the largest environmental health disaster in the world, putting more than 100 million people at risk of cancer and other arsenic-related diseases.4,5 Because of its prevalence in the environment, potential for human exposure, and the magnitude and severity of health problems it causes, the United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) has ranked arsenic as No. 1 on its Priority List of Hazardous Substances for many years. The recent priority list, posted in 2011 (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/SPL/index.html), shows arsenic as No. 1, ahead of lead, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
Epidemiological studies of populations exposed to high levels of arsenic due to ingestion from water, including those from Taiwan,6−8 Argentina,9,10 Chile,11,12 West Bengal, India,13,14 Bangladesh,15−17 and Inner Mongolia, China,18,19 have repeatedly shown strong associations between the exposure to high concentrations of arsenic and the prevalence of several cancers,20−23 most severely bladder, lung, and skin cancers. Arsenic is classified as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Chronic exposure to elevated concentrations of arsenic has also been associated with the increased risk of a number of noncancerous effects.24−27 Although the adverse health effects arising from exposure to arsenic have been well-recognized, the mechanism(s) of action responsible for the diverse range of health effects are complicated and poorly understood.26−30
It is believed that inorganic arsenate (HAsO42-), which is a molecular analogue of phosphate (HPO42-), can compete for phosphate anion transporters and replace phosphate in some biochemical reactions.28 For example, generation of adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP) during oxidative phosphorylation can be inhibited by the replacement of phosphate with arsenate. Depletion of ATP by arsenate has been observed in cellular systems.28 However, the replacement of phosphate in DNA by arsenic is not firmly established.31−35
The toxicity of trivalent arsenicals likely occurs through the interaction of trivalent arsenic species with sulfhydryl groups in proteins. Arsenic binding to a specific protein could alter the conformation and function of the protein as well as its recruitment of and interaction with other functional proteins. Therefore, there has been much emphasis on studies of arsenic binding to proteins, for the purpose of understanding arsenic toxicity and developing arsenic-based therapeutics.
This review summarizes various aspects of arsenic binding to proteins. It discusses the chemical basis and biological implications and consequences of arsenic binding to proteins. It also describes analytical techniques and the characterization of arsenic binding, including the binding affinity, kinetics, and speciation.
591 citations
TL;DR: This review highlights recent advances in ecology, biochemistry, and molecular biology and provides a prelude to the impact of genomics studies.
Abstract: Arsenic and selenium are readily metabolized by prokaryotes, par- ticipating in a full range of metabolic functions including as- similation, methylation, detoxification, and anaerobic respiration. Arsenic speciation and mobility is affected by microbes through oxidation/reduction reactions as part of resistance and respiratory processes. A robust arsenic cycle has been demonstrated in diverse environments. Respiratory arsenate reductases, arsenic methyltrans- ferases, and new components in arsenic resistance have been recently described. The requirement for selenium stems primarily from its in- corporation into selenocysteine and its function in selenoenzymes. Selenium oxyanions can serve as an electron acceptor in anaero- bic respiration, forming distinct nanoparticles of elemental selenium that may be enriched in 76 Se. The biogenesis of selenoproteins has been elucidated, and selenium methyltransferases and a respiratory selenate reductase have also been described. This review highlights recent advances in ecology, biochemistry, and molecular biology and provides a prelude to the impact of genomics studies.
557 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The scale of the problem in terms of population exposed to high As concentrations is greatest in the Bengal Basin with more than 40 million people drinking water containing ‘excessive’ As as mentioned in this paper.
6,741 citations
2,475 citations
TL;DR: Nordstrom et al. as mentioned in this paper argue that human health risks from arsenic in ground water can be minimized by incorporating hydrogeochemical knowledge into water management decisions and by more careful monitoring for arsenic in geologically high-risk areas.
Abstract: Numerous aquifers worldwide carry soluble arsenic at concentrations greater than the World Health Organization--and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency--recommended drinking water standard of 10 mg per liter. Sources include both natural (black shales, young sediments with low flushing rates, gold mineralization, and geothermal environments) and anthropogenic (mining activities, livestock feed additives, pesticides, and arsenic trioxide wastes and stockpiles). Increased solubility and mobility of arsenic is promoted by high pH (>8.5), competing oxyanions, and reducing conditions. In this Policy Forum,
Nordstrom
argues that human health risks from arsenic in ground water can be minimized by incorporating hydrogeochemical knowledge into water management decisions and by more careful monitoring for arsenic in geologically high-risk areas.
1,469 citations
TL;DR: Sedimentological study of the Ganges alluvial sediments shows that the arsenic derives from the reductive dissolution of arsenic-rich iron oxyhydroxides, which in turn are derived from weathering of base-metal sulphides.
Abstract: In Bangladesh and West Bengal, alluvial Ganges aquifers used for public water supply are polluted with naturally occurring arsenic, which adversely affects the health of millions of people. Here we show that the arsenic derives from the reductive dissolution of arsenic-rich iron oxyhydroxides, which in turn are derived from weathering of base-metal sulphides. This finding means it should now be possible, by sedimentological study of the Ganges alluvial sediments, to guide the placement of new water wells so they will be free of arsenic.
1,454 citations
1,306 citations