The Euro-Crisis and the Courts: Judicial Review and the Political Process in Comparative Perspective
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis of decisions by high courts in Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Portugal and the EU with the aim to discuss the role of the judiciary in fiscal affairs.Abstract:
The Euro-crisis and the legal responses to it have profoundly changed the constitutional architecture of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) leading to the introduction of tighter budgetary rules, new mechanisms of financial stabilization and a comprehensive framework of economic adjustment for states in fiscal troubles. Yet, during the last years, the legal measures enacted by the European Union (EU) and the member states to respond to the crisis have increasingly fell prey to the scrutiny of courts, both at the national and supranational level. This paper provides a first comprehensive analysis of decisions by high courts in Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Portugal and the EU with the aim to discuss the role of the judiciary in fiscal affairs. The paper identifies a trend of increasing judicial involvement in EMU and explains it in light of the intergovernmental approach followed to respond to the Euro-crisis. As the paper argues, the choice of an intergovernmental management of the crisis, with frequent resort to international agreements outside the framework of EU law, has paradoxically produced greater judicialization than what would have occurred had the member states acted within the EU legal order. As the paper suggests, though, constitutional arguments related to expertise, voice and rights still plead in favor of letting the political branches take the lead in fiscal affairs. Hence, the paper concludes by indicating that future reforms of the EMU should be carried out through EU legislation – which is more legitimate in democratic terms (because of the political guarantees that surround law-making in the EU) and more secure in judicial terms (because of the more limited space for judicial overreach). Yet, the paper also underlines how the EU political process needs urgently to be reformed in order to improve its legitimacy and democracy.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Legal and Political Accountability Structure of ‘Post-Crisis’ EU Economic Governance
TL;DR: This article argued that post-crisis governance departs from the mechanisms of legal and political accountability present in previous forms of EU decision-making without substituting new models of accountability in their place.
From EU Governance of Crisis to Crisis of EU Governance
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that Euro-nationalism undermines not only the legitimacy but also the effectiveness of EU governance and that simply extending the EU's governance mix from regulatory to redistributive policies is likely to further undermine its effectiveness and legitimacy.
Posted Content
The Eurozones Crisis of Democratic Legitimacy. Can the EU Rebuild Public Trust and Support for European Economic Integration
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the legitimacy problems of the major institutional actors in the Eurozone crisis, including the ECB, Council, Commission, and EP, as they responded to the crisis in coordination with other policy actors and in communication to the public.
Journal ArticleDOI
Euro crisis responses and the EU legal order : increased institutional variation or constitutional mutation?
TL;DR: The Euro crisis reforms as major example of interstitial institutional change in the EU as mentioned in this paper, and forms of institutional change : unusual sources of law, new tasks for the EU institutions, new organs, competence creep, institutional hybrids, and more differentiated integration.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Saving the Euro at the cost of democracy
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the implications of the financial crisis for the relationship between monetary integration and democratic government in the European Union (EU), and conclude that the present course towards executive federalism can be justified for preventing euro dissolution and recognizing the value of national self-government.
Journal ArticleDOI
Challenging Executive Dominance in European Democracy
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the challenges facing parliaments in particular, and propose a more pro-active and networked role of parliament as countervailing power.
Posted Content
Pringle: Legal Reasoning, Text, Purpose and Teleology
TL;DR: The CJEU's judgment in Pringle as mentioned in this paper saved the European Stability Mechanism from invalidity, given that the contrary conclusion would have precipitated further crisis in the financial markets, and it correctly identified the rationale underlying the no bail out rule, this being to prevent diminution in the incentive for financial probity by the Member States.
The Euro Crisis and the Democratic Governance of the Euro: Legal and Political Issues of a Fiscal Crisis
TL;DR: In this article, leading academics from the fields of economics, law, political science and history met with the European University Institute, with the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Durao Barroso and high-ranking officials to discuss the subject of "Democratic Governance of the Euro".