The Euro-crisis and the courts : Judicial review and the political process in comparative perspective
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis of decisions by high courts in Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Portugal and the EU with the aim to discuss the role of the judiciary in fiscal affairs.Abstract:
The Euro-crisis and the legal responses to it have profoundly changed the constitutional architecture of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) leading to the introduction of tighter budgetary rules, new mechanisms of financial stabilization and a comprehensive framework of economic adjustment for states in fiscal troubles. Yet, during the last years, the legal measures enacted by the European Union (EU) and the member states to respond to the crisis have increasingly fell prey to the scrutiny of courts, both at the national and supranational level. This paper provides a first comprehensive analysis of decisions by high courts in Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Portugal and the EU with the aim to discuss the role of the judiciary in fiscal affairs. The paper identifies a trend of increasing judicial involvement in EMU and explains it in light of the intergovernmental approach followed to respond to the Euro-crisis. As the paper argues, the choice of an intergovernmental management of the crisis, with frequent resort to international agreements outside the framework of EU law, has paradoxically produced greater judicialization than what would have occurred had the member states acted within the EU legal order. As the paper suggests, though, constitutional arguments related to expertise, voice and rights still plead in favor of letting the political branches take the lead in fiscal affairs. Hence, the paper concludes by indicating that future reforms of the EMU should be carried out through EU legislation – which is more legitimate in democratic terms (because of the political guarantees that surround law-making in the EU) and more secure in judicial terms (because of the more limited space for judicial overreach). Yet, the paper also underlines how the EU political process needs urgently to be reformed in order to improve its legitimacy and democracy.read more
Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Legitimacy Through Adjudication: the ESM Treaty and the Fiscal Compact before the National Courts
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the ESM Treaty and the Fiscal Compact are complementary in fostering fiscal responsibility and solidarity within the [EMU] and the fact that only euro area Member States which have correctly implemented the fiscal compact are eligible for ESM support is the strongest expression of this complementarity.
Journal Article
EU crisis and constitutional mutations: a review article
TL;DR: In this paper, a panoramica de la literatura mas relevante sobre implicaciones constitucionales derivadas de the crisis de la Union europea (UE) is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Discussing Subsidiarity in Terms of Justification: Some Practical Issues of the EU Legislative Process
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study the inter-institutional dimension of the practical implementation of the subsidiarity principle in the EU legislative process and argue for a subsidy justification procedure occurring at the beginning of each instance of the EU parliament to move away from confirming (one-way) to deliberative reasoning over the issue of potential subsidy violation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Constitutional Courts, Preliminary Rulings and the “New Form of Law”: The Adjudication of the European Stability Mechanism
TL;DR: In 2012 and 2013, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) was adjudicated by a number of high courts of the Member States (among them Kelsenian constitutional courts as well as representatives of a more hybrid model of judicial review of constitutionality) and the European Court of Justice (CJEU) as mentioned in this paper.
Book ChapterDOI
The Constitution of Greece: EU Membership Perspectives
TL;DR: In this paper, a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the Greek constitution is presented, with a legal character and strong normative force, including a detailed list of rights, including social rights, and a broader concern in Greek academic commentary that constitutional rights and values have been given marginal protection.