The financial burden and distress of patients with cancer: Understanding and stepping-up action on the financial toxicity of cancer treatment.
01 Mar 2018-CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (American Cancer Society)-Vol. 68, Iss: 2, pp 153-165
TL;DR: The authors discuss the nature of financial toxicity, defined as the objective financial burden and subjective financial distress of patients with cancer, as a result of treatments using innovative drugs and concomitant health services, and management strategies for oncologists.
Abstract: “Financial toxicity” has now become a familiar term used in the discussion of cancer drugs, and it is gaining traction in the literature given the high price of newer classes of therapies. However, as a phenomenon in the contemporary treatment and care of people with cancer, financial toxicity is not fully understood, with the discussion on mitigation mainly geared toward interventions at the health system level. Although important, health policy prescriptions take time before their intended results manifest, if they are implemented at all. They require corresponding strategies at the individual patient level. In this review, the authors discuss the nature of financial toxicity, defined as the objective financial burden and subjective financial distress of patients with cancer, as a result of treatments using innovative drugs and concomitant health services. They discuss coping with financial toxicity by patients and how maladaptive coping leads to poor health and nonhealth outcomes. They cover management strategies for oncologists, including having the difficult and urgent conversation about the cost and value of cancer treatment, availability of and access to resources, and assessment of financial toxicity as part of supportive care in the provision of comprehensive cancer care. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:153-165.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: Evaluated using 5,794 genomes representing 364 common U.S. serotypes, including 2,280 human isolates of 117 serotypes from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, SeqSero2 is up to 50 times faster than the original SequSero while maintaining equivalent accuracy for raw reads and substantially improving accuracy for assemblies.
Abstract: SeqSero, launched in 2015, is a software tool for Salmonella serotype determination from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. Despite its routine use in public health and food safety laboratories in the United States and other countries, the original SeqSero pipeline is relatively slow (minutes per genome using sequencing reads), is not optimized for draft genome assemblies, and may assign multiple serotypes for a strain. Here, we present SeqSero2 (github.com/denglab/SeqSero2; denglab.info/SeqSero2), an algorithmic transformation and functional update of the original SeqSero. Major improvements include (i) additional sequence markers for identification of Salmonella species and subspecies and certain serotypes, (ii) a k-mer based algorithm for rapid serotype prediction from raw reads (seconds per genome) and improved serotype prediction from assemblies, and (iii) a targeted assembly approach for specific retrieval of serotype determinants from WGS for serotype prediction, new allele discovery, and prediction troubleshooting. Evaluated using 5,794 genomes representing 364 common U.S. serotypes, including 2,280 human isolates of 117 serotypes from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, SeqSero2 is up to 50 times faster than the original SeqSero while maintaining equivalent accuracy for raw reads and substantially improving accuracy for assemblies. SeqSero2 further suggested that 3% of the tested genomes contained reads from multiple serotypes, indicating a use for contamination detection. In addition to short reads, SeqSero2 demonstrated potential for accurate and rapid serotype prediction directly from long nanopore reads despite base call errors. Testing of 40 nanopore-sequenced genomes of 17 serotypes yielded a single H antigen misidentification.IMPORTANCE Serotyping is the basis of public health surveillance of Salmonella It remains a first-line subtyping method even as surveillance continues to be transformed by whole-genome sequencing. SeqSero allows the integration of Salmonella serotyping into a whole-genome-sequencing-based laboratory workflow while maintaining continuity with the classic serotyping scheme. SeqSero2, informed by extensive testing and application of SeqSero in the United States and other countries, incorporates important improvements and updates that further strengthen its application in routine and large-scale surveillance of Salmonella by whole-genome sequencing.
144 citations
01 May 2020
TL;DR: The aim of this work is to organise health interventions for breast cancer management and research in a tiered framework (high, medium, low value), formulating a scheme of prioritisation per clinical cogency and intrinsic value or magnitude of benefit.
Abstract: The global preparedness and response to the rapid escalation to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2-related disease (COVID-19) to a pandemic proportion has demanded the formulation of a reliable, useful and evidence-based mechanism for health services prioritisation, to achieve the highest quality standards of care to all patients. The prioritisation of high value cancer interventions must be embedded in the agenda for the pandemic response, ensuring that no inconsistency or discrepancy emerge in the health planning processes.The aim of this work is to organise health interventions for breast cancer management and research in a tiered framework (high, medium, low value), formulating a scheme of prioritisation per clinical cogency and intrinsic value or magnitude of benefit. The public health tools and schemes for priority setting in oncology have been used as models, aspiring to capture clinical urgency, value in healthcare, community goals and fairness, while respecting the principles of benevolence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice.We discuss the priority health interventions across the cancer continuum, giving a perspective on the role and meaning to maintain some services (undeferrable) while temporarily abrogate some others (deferrable). Considerations for implementation and the essential link to pre-existing health services, especially primary healthcare, are addressed, outlining a framework for the development of effective and functional services, such as telemedicine.The discussion covers the theme of health systems strategising, and why oncology care, in particular breast cancer care, should be maintained in parallel to pandemic control measures, providing a pragmatic clinical model within the broader context of public healthcare schemes.
136 citations
TL;DR: There is neither a consistent understanding of the construct of financial burden nor do available instruments cover all relevant aspects of a patients’ distress perception, so it is difficult to compare and quantify the prevalence of financial distress.
113 citations
Cites background from "The financial burden and distress o..."
...As a result, the term ‘financial toxicity’ has been established as a generic term, covering both ‘objective financial burden’ and ‘subjective financial distress’ experienced by cancer patients [10]....
[...]
TL;DR: Potential strategies to address the access problems are discussed, including universal health coverage for essential cancer medicines, fairer methods for pricing cancer medicine, reducing development costs, optimizing regulation, and improving reliability in the global supply chain.
Abstract: Globally, cancer is the second leading cause of death, with numbers greatly exceeding those for human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, tuberculosis, and malaria combined. Limited access to timely diagnosis, to affordable, effective treatment, and to high-quality care are just some of the factors that lead to disparities in cancer survival between countries and within countries. In this article, the authors consider various factors that prevent access to cancer medicines (particularly access to essential cancer medicines). Even if an essential cancer medicine is included on a national medicines list, cost might preclude its use, it might be prescribed or used inappropriately, weak infrastructure might prevent it being accessed by those who could benefit, or quality might not be guaranteed. Potential strategies to address the access problems are discussed, including universal health coverage for essential cancer medicines, fairer methods for pricing cancer medicines, reducing development costs, optimizing regulation, and improving reliability in the global supply chain. Optimizing schedules for cancer therapy could reduce not only costs, but also adverse events, and improve access. More and better biomarkers are required to target patients who are most likely to benefit from cancer medicines. The optimum use of cancer medicines depends on the effective delivery of several services allied to oncology (including laboratory, imaging, surgery, and radiotherapy). Investment is necessary in all aspects of cancer care, from these supportive services to technologies, and the training of health care workers and other staff.
111 citations
TL;DR: This nationally-representative investigation of an initially-estimated 9.5 million newly-diagnosed persons with cancer who were ≥50 years of age found a substantial proportion incurring financial toxicity.
109 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival.
Abstract: Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States in the current year and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2017, 1,688,780 new cancer cases and 600,920 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. For all sites combined, the cancer incidence rate is 20% higher in men than in women, while the cancer death rate is 40% higher. However, sex disparities vary by cancer type. For example, thyroid cancer incidence rates are 3-fold higher in women than in men (21 vs 7 per 100,000 population), despite equivalent death rates (0.5 per 100,000 population), largely reflecting sex differences in the "epidemic of diagnosis." Over the past decade of available data, the overall cancer incidence rate (2004-2013) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% annually in men, while the cancer death rate (2005-2014) declined by about 1.5% annually in both men and women. From 1991 to 2014, the overall cancer death rate dropped 25%, translating to approximately 2,143,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the cancer death rate was 15% higher in blacks than in whites in 2014, increasing access to care as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may expedite the narrowing racial gap; from 2010 to 2015, the proportion of blacks who were uninsured halved, from 21% to 11%, as it did for Hispanics (31% to 16%). Gains in coverage for traditionally underserved Americans will facilitate the broader application of existing cancer control knowledge across every segment of the population. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
13,427 citations
City of Hope National Medical Center1, Harvard University2, American Society of Clinical Oncology3, Virginia Commonwealth University4, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill5, University of Michigan6, Northwestern University7, National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship8, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre9, Johns Hopkins University10
TL;DR: The guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous guideline and inpatients and outpatients with advanced cancer should receive dedicated palliative care services, early in the disease course, concurrent with active treatment.
Abstract: Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncology clinicians, patients, family and friend caregivers, and palliative care specialists to update the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) on the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care for all patients diagnosed with cancer. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of members of the ASCO Ad Hoc Palliative Care Expert Panel to develop an update. The 2012 PCO was based on a review of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) by the National Cancer Institute Physicians Data Query and additional trials. The panel conducted an updated systematic review seeking randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, as well as secondary analyses of RCTs in the 2012 PCO, published from March 2010 to January 2016. Results The guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous guideline. Nine RCTs, one quasiexperimental trial, and five secondary analyses from RCTs in the 2012 PCO on providing palliative care services to patients with cancer and/or their caregivers, including family caregivers, were found to inform the update. Recommendations Inpatients and outpatients with advanced cancer should receive dedicated palliative care services, early in the disease course, concurrent with active treatment. Referral of patients to interdisciplinary palliative care teams is optimal, and services may complement existing programs. Providers may refer family and friend caregivers of patients with early or advanced cancer to palliative care services.
1,283 citations
TL;DR: Insured patients undergoing cancer treatment and seeking copayment assistance experience considerable subjective financial burden, and they may alter their care to defray out-of-pocket expenses.
Abstract: Purpose.
Cancer patients carry rising burdens of health care-related out-of-pocket expenses, and a growing number of patients are considered “underinsured.” Our objective was to describe experiences of insured cancer patients requesting copayment assistance and to describe the impact of health care expenses on well-being and treatment.
796 citations
TL;DR: Severe financial distress requiring bankruptcy protection after cancer diagnosis appears to be a risk factor for mortality, according to Cox proportional hazards models.
Abstract: PurposePatients with cancer are more likely to file for bankruptcy than the general population, but the impact of severe financial distress on health outcomes among patients with cancer is not known.MethodsWe linked Western Washington SEER Cancer Registry records with federal bankruptcy records for the region. By using propensity score matching to account for differences in several demographic and clinical factors between patients who did and did not file for bankruptcy, we then fit Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between bankruptcy filing and survival.ResultsBetween 1995 and 2009, 231,596 persons were diagnosed with cancer. Patients who filed for bankruptcy (n = 4,728) were more likely to be younger, female, and nonwhite, to have local- or regional- (v distant-) stage disease at diagnosis, and have received treatment. After propensity score matching, 3,841 patients remained in each group (bankruptcy v no bankruptcy). In the matched sample, mean age was 53.0 years, 54% were men...
601 citations
Additional excerpts
...001).(60) Colorectal cancer and prostate can-...
[...]
TL;DR: Findings suggest that employers and governments may have a policy role to play in creating programs and incentives that could help people cover expenses in the first year following a cancer diagnosis and that Medicare and Social Security may mitigate bankruptcy risk for the older group.
Abstract: Much has been written about the relationship between high medical expenses and the likelihood of filing for bankruptcy, but the relationship between receiving a cancer diagnosis and filing for bankruptcy is less well understood. We estimated the incidence and relative risk of bankruptcy for people age twenty-one or older diagnosed with cancer compared to people the same age without cancer by conducting a retrospective cohort analysis that used a variety of medical, personal, legal, and bankruptcy sources covering the Western District of Washington State in US Bankruptcy Court for the period 1995–2009. We found that cancer patients were 2.65 times more likely to go bankrupt than people without cancer. Younger cancer patients had 2–5 times higher rates of bankruptcy than cancer patients age sixty-five or older, which indicates that Medicare and Social Security may mitigate bankruptcy risk for the older group. The findings suggest that employers and governments may have a policy role to play in creating prog...
570 citations
"The financial burden and distress o..." refers background in this paper
...65 times greater risk of declaring personal bankruptcy than those without cancer.(58)...
[...]