scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

The frequency and extent of sub-ice phytoplankton blooms in the Arctic Ocean

01 Mar 2017-Science Advances (American Association for the Advancement of Science)-Vol. 3, Iss: 3
TL;DR: The model results indicate that the recent thinning of Arctic sea ice is the main cause of a marked increase in the prevalence of light conditions conducive to sub-ice blooms, and that as little as 20 years ago, the conditions required for sub-ICE blooms may have been uncommon, but their frequency has increased to the point that nearly 30% of the ice-covered Arctic Ocean in July permits sub- ice blooms.
Abstract: In July 2011, the observation of a massive phytoplankton bloom underneath a sea ice–covered region of the Chukchi Sea shifted the scientific consensus that regions of the Arctic Ocean covered by sea ice were inhospitable to photosynthetic life. Although the impact of widespread phytoplankton blooms under sea ice on Arctic Ocean ecology and carbon fixation is potentially marked, the prevalence of these events in the modern Arctic and in the recent past is, to date, unknown. We investigate the timing, frequency, and evolution of these events over the past 30 years. Although sea ice strongly attenuates solar radiation, it has thinned significantly over the past 30 years. The thinner summertime Arctic sea ice is increasingly covered in melt ponds, which permit more light penetration than bare or snow-covered ice. Our model results indicate that the recent thinning of Arctic sea ice is the main cause of a marked increase in the prevalence of light conditions conducive to sub-ice blooms. We find that as little as 20 years ago, the conditions required for sub-ice blooms may have been uncommon, but their frequency has increased to the point that nearly 30% of the ice-covered Arctic Ocean in July permits sub-ice blooms. Recent climate change may have markedly altered the ecology of the Arctic Ocean.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Karina von Schuckmann, Pierre-Yves Le Traon, Neville Smith, Ananda Pascual, Pierre Brasseur, Katja Fennel1, Samy Djavidnia2, Signe Aaboe2, Enrique Álvarez Fanjul, Emmanuelle Autret3, Lars Axell4, Roland Aznar, Mario Benincasa5, Abderahim Bentamy3, Fredrik Boberg6, Romain Bourdallé-Badie, Bruno Buongiorno Nardelli5, Vittorio E. Brando5, Clement Bricaud, Lars-Anders Breivik2, Robert J. W. Brewin7, Arthur Capet8, Adrien Ceschin, Stefania Angela Ciliberti9, Gianpiero Cossarini10, Marta de Alfonso, Álvaro de Pascual Collar, Jos de Kloe11, Julie Deshayes12, Charles Desportes, Marie Drevillon, Yann Drillet, R. Droghei5, Clotilde Dubois, Owen Embury13, Hélène Etienne, Claudia Fratianni14, Jesús García Lafuente15, Marcos García Sotillo, Gilles Garric, Florent Gasparin, Riccardo Gerin10, Simon A. Good16, Jérôme Gourrion, Marilaure Grégoire8, Eric Greiner, Stephanie Guinehut, Elodie Gutknecht, Fabrice Hernandez, Olga Hernandez, Jacob L. Høyer6, Laura Jackson16, Simon Jandt, Simon A. Josey17, Mélanie Juza, John Kennedy16, Zoi Kokkini10, Gerasimos Korres, Mariliis Kõuts18, Priidik Lagemaa18, Thomas Lavergne2, Bernard Le Cann19, J. F. Legeais, Bénédicte Lemieux-Dudon, Bruno Levier, Vidar S. Lien, Ilja Maljutenko18, Fernando Manzano, Marta Marcos20, Veselka Marinova21, Simona Masina14, Elena Mauri10, Michael Mayer22, Angélique Melet, Frédéric Mélin, Benoit Meyssignac, Maeva Monier, Malte Müller2, Sandrine Mulet, Cristina Naranjo15, Giulio Notarstefano10, Aurélien Paulmier, Begoña Pérez Gomez, Irene Pérez Gonzalez, Elisaveta Peneva23, Coralie Perruche, K. Andrew Peterson16, Nadia Pinardi24, Andrea Pisano5, Silvia Pardo7, Pierre-Marie Poulain10, Roshin P. Raj, Urmas Raudsepp18, Michaelis Ravdas, Rebecca Reid16, Marie-Hélène Rio, Stefano Salon10, Annette Samuelsen, Michela Sammartino5, Simone Sammartino, Anne Britt Sandø, Rosalia Santoleri5, Shubha Sathyendranath7, Jun She6, Simona Simoncelli14, Cosimo Solidoro10, Ad Stoffelen11, Andrea Storto, Tanguy Szerkely, Susanne Tamm, Steffen Tietsche22, Jonathan Tinker16, Joaquín Tintoré, Ana Trindade, Daphne van Zanten25, Luc Vandenbulcke8, Anton Verhoef11, Nathalie Verbrugge, Lena Viktorsson4, Sarah Wakelin26, Anna Zacharioudaki, Hao Zuo22 
TL;DR: Sandrine Mulet, Bruno Buongiorno Nardelli, Simon Good, Andrea Pisano, Eric Greiner, Maeva Monier, Emmanuel... as discussed by the authors The Essential Variables of Ocean Temperature and Salinity
Abstract: Introduction — s1 Chapter 1: Essential Variables — s4 1.1 Ocean temperature and salinity Sandrine Mulet, Bruno Buongiorno Nardelli, Simon Good, Andrea Pisano, Eric Greiner, Maeva Monier, Emmanuel...

114 citations

01 May 2010
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a melt pond evolution theory and incorporated this theory into the Los Alamos CICE sea ice model, which has required us to include the refreezing of melt ponds.
Abstract: The extent and thickness of the Arctic sea ice cover has decreased dramatically in the past few decades with minima in sea ice extent in September 2005 and 2007. These minima have not been predicted in the IPCC AR4 report, suggesting that the sea ice component of climate models should more realistically represent the processes controlling the sea ice mass balance. One of the processes poorly represented in sea ice models is the formation and evolution of melt ponds. Melt ponds accumulate on the surface of sea ice from snow and sea ice melt and their presence reduces the albedo of the ice cover, leading to further melt. Toward the end of the melt season, melt ponds cover up to 50% of the sea ice surface. We have developed a melt pond evolution theory. Here, we have incorporated this melt pond theory into the Los Alamos CICE sea ice model, which has required us to include the refreezing of melt ponds. We present results showing that the presence, or otherwise, of a representation of melt ponds has a significant effect on the predicted sea ice thickness and extent. We also present a sensitivity study to uncertainty in the sea ice permeability, number of thickness categories in the model representation, meltwater redistribution scheme, and pond albedo. We conclude with a recommendation that our melt pond scheme is included in sea ice models, and the number of thickness categories should be increased and concentrated at lower thicknesses.

89 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors show that North Atlantic atmospheric iodine levels have tripled since 1950, and propose ozone pollution and enhanced biological production Arctic sea ice thinning as a primary driver.
Abstract: Atmospheric iodine causes tropospheric ozone depletion and aerosol formation, both of which have significant climate impacts, and is an essential dietary element for humans. However, the evolution of atmospheric iodine levels at decadal and centennial scales is unknown. Here, we report iodine concentrations in the RECAP ice-core (coastal East Greenland) to investigate how atmospheric iodine levels in the North Atlantic have evolved over the past 260 years (1750–2011), this being the longest record of atmospheric iodine in the Northern Hemisphere. The levels of iodine tripled from 1950 to 2010. Our results suggest that this increase is driven by anthropogenic ozone pollution and enhanced sub-ice phytoplankton production associated with the recent thinning of Arctic sea ice. Increasing atmospheric iodine has accelerated ozone loss and has considerably enhanced iodine transport and deposition to the Northern Hemisphere continents. Future climate and anthropogenic forcing may continue to amplify oceanic iodine emissions with potentially significant health and environmental impacts at global scale.

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Arctic sea ice landscape is rapidly transforming and increasing light penetration will initiate earlier seasonal primary production as discussed by the authors, accompanied by an increase in ice algae and phytoplankton biomass, augmenting the emission of dimethyl sulfide and capture of carbon dioxide.
Abstract: The Arctic sea-ice-scape is rapidly transforming. Increasing light penetration will initiate earlier seasonal primary production. This earlier growing season may be accompanied by an increase in ice algae and phytoplankton biomass, augmenting the emission of dimethylsulfide and capture of carbon dioxide. Secondary production may also increase on the shelves, although the loss of sea ice exacerbates the demise of sea-ice fauna, endemic fish and megafauna. Sea-ice loss may also deliver more methane to the atmosphere, but warmer ice may release fewer halogens, resulting in fewer ozone depletion events. The net changes in carbon drawdown are still highly uncertain. Despite large uncertainties in these assessments, we expect disruptive changes that warrant intensified long-term observations and modelling efforts.

78 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The extreme seasonality in photoperiod of high-latitude oceans may counteract such shifts and rather act as a zoogeographical filter limiting poleward range expansion, according to a review of studies linking physical drivers to latitudinal extent.
Abstract: Light is a central driver of biological processes and systems. Receding sea-ice changes the lightscape of high-latitude oceans and more light will penetrate into the sea. This affects bottom-up control through primary productivity and top-down control through vision-based foraging. We model effects of sea-ice shading on visual search to develop a mechanistic understanding of how climate-driven sea-ice retreat affects predator-prey interactions. We adapt a prey encounter model for ice-covered waters, where prey-detection performance of planktivorous fish depends on the light cycle. We use hindcast sea-ice concentrations (past 35 years) and compare with a future no-ice scenario to project visual range along two south-north transects with different sea-ice distributions and seasonality, one through the Bering Sea and one through the Barents Sea. The transect approach captures the transition from sub-Arctic to Arctic ecosystems and allows for comparison of latitudinal differences between longitudes. We find that past sea-ice retreat has increased visual search at a rate of 2.7 to 4.2% per decade from the long-term mean; and for high latitudes, we predict a 16-fold increase in clearance rate. Top-down control is therefore predicted to intensify. Ecological and evolutionary consequences for polar marine communities and energy flows would follow, possibly also as tipping points and regime shifts. We expect species distributions to track the receding ice-edge, and in particular expect species with large migratory capacity to make foraging forays into high-latitude oceans. However, the extreme seasonality in photoperiod of high-latitude oceans may counteract such shifts and rather act as a zoogeographical filter limiting poleward range expansion. The provided mechanistic insights are relevant for pelagic ecosystems globally, including lakes where shifted distributions are seldom possible but where predator-prey consequences would be much related. As part of the discussion on photoperiodic implications for high-latitude range shifts, we provide a short review of studies linking physical drivers to latitudinal extent. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

60 citations


Cites background from "The frequency and extent of sub-ice..."

  • ..., 2008) but also to change the timing (Ji, Jin, & Varpe, 2013) and the extent of (sub-ice) phytoplankton blooms (Horvat et al., 2017), depletion of nitrate and enhanced stratification may increasingly limit productivity towards the end of the century (Slagstad, Wassmann, & Ellingsen, 2015; Vancoppenolle et al....

    [...]

  • ...…to increase PP (Arrigo et al., 2008) but also to change the timing (Ji, Jin, & Varpe, 2013) and the extent of (sub-ice) phytoplankton blooms (Horvat et al., 2017), depletion of nitrate and enhanced stratification may increasingly limit productivity towards the end of the century (Slagstad,…...

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The NCEP-DOE Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-II) reanalysis is a follow-on project to the "50-year" (1948-present) N CEP-NCAR Reanalysis Project.
Abstract: The NCEP–DOE Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP-II) reanalysis is a follow-on project to the “50-year” (1948–present) NCEP–NCAR Reanalysis Project. NCEP–DOE AMIP-II re-analysis covers the “20-year” satellite period of 1979 to the present and uses an updated forecast model, updated data assimilation system, improved diagnostic outputs, and fixes for the known processing problems of the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis. Only minor differences are found in the primary analysis variables such as free atmospheric geopotential height and winds in the Northern Hemisphere extratropics, while significant improvements upon NCEP–NCAR reanalysis are made in land surface parameters and land–ocean fluxes. This analysis can be used as a supplement to the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis especially where the original analysis has problems. The differences between the two analyses also provide a measure of uncertainty in current analyses.

5,177 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
16 Jul 2004-Science
TL;DR: Using inorganic carbon measurements from an international survey effort in the 1990s and a tracer-based separation technique, the authors estimate a global oceanic anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) sink for the period from 1800 to 1994 of 118 19 petagrams of carbon.
Abstract: Using inorganic carbon measurements from an international survey effort in the 1990s and a tracer-based separation technique, we estimate a global oceanic anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) sink for the period from 1800 to 1994 of 118 19 petagrams of carbon. The oceanic sink accounts for48% of the total fossil-fuel and cement-manufacturing emissions, implying that the terrestrial biosphere was a net source of CO 2 to the atmosphere of about 39 28 petagrams of carbon for this period. The current fraction of total anthropogenic CO2 emissions stored in the ocean appears to be about one-third of the long-term potential. Since the beginning of the industrial period in the late 18th century, i.e., over the anthropocene (1), humankind has emitted large quantities of CO2 into the atmosphere, mainly as a result of fossil-fuel burning, but also because of land-use practices, e.g., deforestation (2). Measurements and reconstructions of the atmospheric CO2 history reveal, however, that less than half of these emissions remain in the atmosphere (3). The anthropogenic CO2 that did not accumulate in the atmosphere must have been taken up by the ocean, by the land biosphere, or by a combination of both. The relative roles of the ocean and land biosphere as sinks for anthropogenic CO2 over the anthropocene are currently not known. Although the anthropogenic CO2 budget for the past two decades, i.e., the 1980s and 1990s, has been investigated in detail (3), the estimates of the ocean sink have not been based on direct measurements of changes in the oceanic inventory of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). Recognizing the need to constrain the oceanic uptake, transport, and storage of anthropogenic CO 2 for the anthropocene and to provide a baseline for future estimates of oceanic CO 2 uptake, two international ocean research programs, the World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) and the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS), jointly conducted a comprehensive survey of inorganic carbon distributions in the global ocean in the 1990s (4). After completion of the U.S. field program in 1998, a 5-year effort was begun to compile and rigorously quality-control the U.S. and international data sets, in

3,291 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive review of the status of the contemporary carbon cycle of the Arctic and its response to climate change is presented to clarify key uncertainties and vulnerabilities in the response of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to ongoing climatic change.
Abstract: The recent warming in the Arctic is affecting a broad spectrum of physical, ecological, and human/cultural systems that may be irreversible on century time scales and have the potential to cause rapid changes in the earth system. The response of the carbon cycle of the Arctic to changes in climate is a major issue of global concern, yet there has not been a comprehensive review of the status of the contemporary carbon cycle of the Arctic and its response to climate change. This review is designed to clarify key uncertainties and vulnerabilities in the response of the carbon cycle of the Arctic to ongoing climatic change. While it is clear that there are substantial stocks of carbon in the Arctic, there are also significant uncertainties associated with the magnitude of organic matter stocks contained in permafrost and the storage of methane hydrates beneath both subterranean and submerged permafrost of the Arctic. In the context of the global carbon cycle, this review demonstrates that the Arctic plays an important role in the global dynamics of both CO2 and CH4. Studies suggest that the Arctic has been a sink for atmospheric CO2 of between 0 and 0.8 Pg C/yr in recent decades, which is between 0% and 25% of the global net land/ocean flux during the 1990s. The Arctic is a substantial source of CH4 to the atmosphere (between 32 and 112 Tg CH4/yr), primarily because of the large area of wetlands throughout the region. Analyses to date indicate that the sensitivity of the carbon cycle of the Arctic during the remainder of the 21st century is highly uncertain. To improve the capability to assess the sensitivity of the carbon cycle of the Arctic to projected climate change, we recommend that (1) integrated regional studies be conducted to link observations of carbon dynamics to the processes that are likely to influence those dynamics, and (2) the understanding gained from these integrated studies be incorporated into both uncoupled and fully coupled carbon-climate modeling efforts. (Less)

953 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the decline of sea ice thickness in the Arctic Ocean from ICESat (2003-2008) is placed in the context of estimates from 42 years of submarine records (1958-2000) described by Rothrock et al. (1999, 2008).
Abstract: [1] The decline of sea ice thickness in the Arctic Ocean from ICESat (2003–2008) is placed in the context of estimates from 42 years of submarine records (1958–2000) described by Rothrock et al. (1999, 2008). While the earlier 1999 work provides a longer historical record of the regional changes, the latter offers a more refined analysis, over a sizable portion of the Arctic Ocean supported by a much stronger and richer data set. Within the data release area (DRA) of declassified submarine sonar measurements (covering ∼38% of the Arctic Ocean), the overall mean winter thickness of 3.64 m in 1980 can be compared to a 1.89 m mean during the last winter of the ICESat record—an astonishing decrease of 1.75 m in thickness. Between 1975 and 2000, the steepest rate of decrease is −0.08 m/yr in 1990 compared to a slightly higher winter/summer rate of −0.10/−0.20 m/yr in the five-year ICESat record (2003–2008). Prior to 1997, ice extent in the DRA was >90% during the summer minimum. This can be contrasted to the gradual decrease in the early 2000s followed by an abrupt drop to <55% during the record setting minimum in 2007. This combined analysis shows a long-term trend of sea ice thinning over submarine and ICESat records that span five decades.

932 citations