scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education

Donna Y. Ford, +2 more
- 23 Jan 1996 - 
- Vol. 65, Iss: 4, pp 472
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education as mentioned in this paper is a scholarly masterpiece that synthesizes research, theory, and policy on multicultural education, focusing on all racially and culturally diverse groups (Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, European Americans, Asian Americans, and African Americans).
Abstract
The Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, edited by James A. Banks and Cherry A. McGhee Banks. New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan, 1995. 882 pp. $75.00, cloth. Reviewed by Donna Y. Ford, The Ohio State University. In The Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, editors Banks and Banks and their contributors have created a scholarly masterpiece that synthesizes research, theory, and policy on multicultural education. The book's 11 parts are woven into a comprehensive body of work not likely to be equalled or duplicated soon. Unlike some multicultural scholars, Banks and Banks have adopted a broadly encompassing perspective on multiculturalism. Their vision of multiculturalism is not limited to multiethnic education-that is, education that attends exclusively to issues of race or ethnicity. Instead, contributors focus on all racially and culturally diverse groups-Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, European Americans, Asian Americans, and African Americans-as well as examining diversity within and between groups. The editors offer the following definition of multicultural education: A field of study designed to increase educational equity for all students that incorporates, for this purpose, content, concepts, principles, theories, and paradigms from history, the social and behavioral sciences, and particularly from ethnic studies and women studies. (p. xii) Equally noteworthy is the editors' inclusion of demographic matrices often overlooked in education and research on multicultural education: linguistic and economic diversity, diverse families, gender identity, and combinations of these variables. Although no group is viewed as a homogenous collective of common traditions and values, these important (but sometimes superfiaal) cultural distinctions are not given undue attention in the Handbook. Rather, the authors focus their discussions on more substantive cultural issues and variables. Many contributors shed new and additional light on the topic of their chapter; few resort to rehashing the familiar and tiresome discourse that defensively argues the need for multicultural education. The contributors merely present the data, and readers are left to form their own opinions. The Handbook is divided into 47 chapters presented in an in-depth, balanced, and scholarly fashion. Each chapter successfully describes and extends research, theory, policy, and / or practice. The book clarifies the meaning and boundaries of multicultural education and helps to alleviate the widespread misconceptions that hinder its greater acceptance in academia. To this end, contributors use case studies, survey research, ethnographic studies, historical inquiry, philosophical inquiry, and experimental and quasi-experimental research. In keeping with the editors' concept of multicultural education, the contributors also adopt an interdisciplinary approach, borrowing relevant work from history, anthropology, sociology, literature, and other disciplines. Part I summarizes the history, goals, status, and development of multicultural education. It begins with James Banks's article, which outlines key dimensions of multicultural education as well as landmark events in the historical development of ethnic studies and multicultural education. Geneva Gay analyzes the conceptual connections between general curriculum theory and multicultural education. Donna Gollnick reports on national and state-level multicultural education initiatives aimed at students who may be low-income, female, limited-English-proficient, or from racially and culturally diverse groups. Gollnick categorizes these initiatives using the Sleeter and Grant multicultural typology (e.g., singlegroup studies, human relations). Cherry Banks discusses gender and race as factors in educational leadership and administration, focusing on factors that undermine the attainment of leadership positions among women. Although an important chapter, it seems misplaced in this section of the book, and perhaps would have been better placed in Part IX, which focuses on higher education. …

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education?

TL;DR: Critical race theory (CRT) as discussed by the authors is a counter-legal scholarship to the positivist and liberal legal discourse of civil rights, arguing against the slow pace of racial reform in the United States.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cultural Ways of Learning: Individual Traits or Repertoires of Practice:

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue against the common assumption that regularities are static and that general traits of individuals are attributable categorically to ethnic group membership, and suggest that a cultural-historical approach can be used to help move beyond this assumption by focusing researchers and practitioners' attention on variations in individuals' and groups' histories of engagement in cultural practices.
Journal ArticleDOI

How Large Are Teacher Effects

TL;DR: This paper used data from a four-year experiment in which teachers and students were randomly assigned to classes to estimate teacher effects on student achievement, and found that teacher effects are estimated as between-teacher (but within-school) variance components of achievement status and residualized achievement gains.

The Color of Discipline: Sources of Racial and Gender Disproportionality in School Punishment. Policy Research Report.

TL;DR: This paper explored three commonly offered hypotheses for disproportionate discipline based on gender, race, and socioeconomic status, and found that there appeared to be a differential pattern of treatment, originating at the classroom level, wherein African-American students are referred to the office for infractions that are more subjective in interpretation.
Book ChapterDOI

An integrative theory of intergroup contact

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a re-presentation of Allport's classic contact hypothesis and show that many of his original propositions have capably withstood the test of time.