The Human Condition.
Citations
34 citations
34 citations
34 citations
Cites background from "The Human Condition."
...In the fifth article, Strauß and Fleischmann (2019) consider yet another aspect of solidarity by investigating cultural work in the social factory and by focusing on underpinning political action that an Arendtian (Arendt, 1998) distinction between labour, work and political action encourages. Their research setting is a summer school comprising a diverse group of international attendees, mainly architecture, design and engineering students, and beneficiaries who come together to refurbish a house privately owned by an individual without the economic resources to sustain their home. The research investigates how a temporary group of individuals can develop group cohesion as part of a summer school in which solidarity with socially, economically and aesthetically de-valued and marginalised positions was actively encouraged. Individual expectations, requirements and political perspectives provide added complications to the development of group cohesion, let alone solidarity, within this temporary group and between the group and the house owner. These positions were also made public in attempts to influence public opinion and local housing policy. The article thus considers solidarity in work and non-work, as well as the political mode of human activities. Such changing notions of work also require changing notions of solidarity and demand a focus that goes beyond merely considering a redistribution of resources. Solidarity is thus conceptualised as a precarious and temporary phenomenon that interconnects socio-economic and socio-political spheres. Since the formation of large-scale trade union organisation in the late 19th century, internationalism has commonly been a foundational aspect of the labour movement’s approach to solidarity. At the institutional level, there is a long-established network of international trade union federations designed specifically to co-ordinate international co-operation and solidarity among member unions and between industrial sectors. In the next article, Fox-Hodess (2019) examines an innovative attempt by the International Dockworkers Council (IDC) to foster long-term internationalism ‘from below’, which she compares and contrasts with the traditional bureaucratically mediated approach of the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF). Fox-Hodess (2019) acknowledges that there have been plenty of examples of ‘one-off’ global solidarity campaigns organised in a non-bureaucratic fashion and driven by workplace activists, but the institutionalisation of rank-and-file internationalism into the routine work of the IDC is a distinct and novel organisational form for global trade unionism. Fox-Hodess (2019) explains how the IDC’s removal of bureaucratic layers mediating routine contact between workplace dock workers in different countries allowed them to communicate directly and quickly with one another, especially when they wanted to build on-the-ground solidarity for a labour dispute or other campaign....
[...]
...In the fifth article, Strauß and Fleischmann (2019) consider yet another aspect of solidarity by investigating cultural work in the social factory and by focusing on underpinning political action that an Arendtian (Arendt, 1998) distinction between labour, work and political action encourages. Their research setting is a summer school comprising a diverse group of international attendees, mainly architecture, design and engineering students, and beneficiaries who come together to refurbish a house privately owned by an individual without the economic resources to sustain their home. The research investigates how a temporary group of individuals can develop group cohesion as part of a summer school in which solidarity with socially, economically and aesthetically de-valued and marginalised positions was actively encouraged. Individual expectations, requirements and political perspectives provide added complications to the development of group cohesion, let alone solidarity, within this temporary group and between the group and the house owner. These positions were also made public in attempts to influence public opinion and local housing policy. The article thus considers solidarity in work and non-work, as well as the political mode of human activities. Such changing notions of work also require changing notions of solidarity and demand a focus that goes beyond merely considering a redistribution of resources. Solidarity is thus conceptualised as a precarious and temporary phenomenon that interconnects socio-economic and socio-political spheres. Since the formation of large-scale trade union organisation in the late 19th century, internationalism has commonly been a foundational aspect of the labour movement’s approach to solidarity. At the institutional level, there is a long-established network of international trade union federations designed specifically to co-ordinate international co-operation and solidarity among member unions and between industrial sectors. In the next article, Fox-Hodess (2019) examines an innovative attempt by the International Dockworkers Council (IDC) to foster long-term internationalism ‘from below’, which she compares and contrasts with the traditional bureaucratically mediated approach of the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF). Fox-Hodess (2019) acknowledges that there have been plenty of examples of ‘one-off’ global solidarity campaigns organised in a non-bureaucratic fashion and driven by workplace activists, but the institutionalisation of rank-and-file internationalism into the routine work of the IDC is a distinct and novel organisational form for global trade unionism....
[...]
...In the fifth article, Strauß and Fleischmann (2019) consider yet another aspect of solidarity by investigating cultural work in the social factory and by focusing on underpinning political action that an Arendtian (Arendt, 1998) distinction between labour, work and political action encourages. Their research setting is a summer school comprising a diverse group of international attendees, mainly architecture, design and engineering students, and beneficiaries who come together to refurbish a house privately owned by an individual without the economic resources to sustain their home. The research investigates how a temporary group of individuals can develop group cohesion as part of a summer school in which solidarity with socially, economically and aesthetically de-valued and marginalised positions was actively encouraged. Individual expectations, requirements and political perspectives provide added complications to the development of group cohesion, let alone solidarity, within this temporary group and between the group and the house owner. These positions were also made public in attempts to influence public opinion and local housing policy. The article thus considers solidarity in work and non-work, as well as the political mode of human activities. Such changing notions of work also require changing notions of solidarity and demand a focus that goes beyond merely considering a redistribution of resources. Solidarity is thus conceptualised as a precarious and temporary phenomenon that interconnects socio-economic and socio-political spheres. Since the formation of large-scale trade union organisation in the late 19th century, internationalism has commonly been a foundational aspect of the labour movement’s approach to solidarity. At the institutional level, there is a long-established network of international trade union federations designed specifically to co-ordinate international co-operation and solidarity among member unions and between industrial sectors. In the next article, Fox-Hodess (2019) examines an innovative attempt by the International Dockworkers Council (IDC) to foster long-term internationalism ‘from below’, which she compares and contrasts with the traditional bureaucratically mediated approach of the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF). Fox-Hodess (2019) acknowledges that there have been plenty of examples of ‘one-off’ global solidarity campaigns organised in a non-bureaucratic fashion and driven by workplace activists, but the institutionalisation of rank-and-file internationalism into the routine work of the IDC is a distinct and novel organisational form for global trade unionism. Fox-Hodess (2019) explains how the IDC’s removal of bureaucratic layers mediating routine contact between workplace dock workers in different countries allowed them to communicate directly and quickly with one another, especially when they wanted to build on-the-ground solidarity for a labour dispute or other campaign. Communicating directly generated greater agility, militancy and shared culture across national borders, resulting in the building of an international solidarity network potentially involving tens of thousands of dock workers across the globe. Fox-Hodess (2019) acknowledges that the downside...
[...]
...In the fifth article, Strauß and Fleischmann (2019) consider yet another aspect of solidarity by investigating cultural work in the social factory and by focusing on underpinning political action that an Arendtian (Arendt, 1998) distinction between labour, work and political action encourages. Their research setting is a summer school comprising a diverse group of international attendees, mainly architecture, design and engineering students, and beneficiaries who come together to refurbish a house privately owned by an individual without the economic resources to sustain their home. The research investigates how a temporary group of individuals can develop group cohesion as part of a summer school in which solidarity with socially, economically and aesthetically de-valued and marginalised positions was actively encouraged. Individual expectations, requirements and political perspectives provide added complications to the development of group cohesion, let alone solidarity, within this temporary group and between the group and the house owner. These positions were also made public in attempts to influence public opinion and local housing policy. The article thus considers solidarity in work and non-work, as well as the political mode of human activities. Such changing notions of work also require changing notions of solidarity and demand a focus that goes beyond merely considering a redistribution of resources. Solidarity is thus conceptualised as a precarious and temporary phenomenon that interconnects socio-economic and socio-political spheres. Since the formation of large-scale trade union organisation in the late 19th century, internationalism has commonly been a foundational aspect of the labour movement’s approach to solidarity. At the institutional level, there is a long-established network of international trade union federations designed specifically to co-ordinate international co-operation and solidarity among member unions and between industrial sectors. In the next article, Fox-Hodess (2019) examines an innovative attempt by the International Dockworkers Council (IDC) to foster long-term internationalism ‘from below’, which she compares and contrasts with the traditional bureaucratically mediated approach of the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF)....
[...]
...In the fifth article, Strauß and Fleischmann (2019) consider yet another aspect of solidarity by investigating cultural work in the social factory and by focusing on underpinning political action that an Arendtian (Arendt, 1998) distinction between labour, work and political action encourages....
[...]
34 citations
Cites background from "The Human Condition."
...In her book “The Human Condition,” Hannah Arendt (1998) critiqued the instrumentalism and cycles of social reproduction that she saw as already characterizing the industrial society of the post-war years: If we see these processes against the background of human purposes, which have a willed…...
[...]
...In her book “The Human Condition,” Hannah Arendt (1998) critiqued the instrumentalism and cycles of social reproduction that she saw as already characterizing the industrial society of the post-war years: If we see these processes against the background of human purposes, which have a willed beginning and a definite end, they assume the character of automatism....
[...]
...What she saw as action is exactly that the opposite to the patterns of life paradigm; action is the beginning which happens “against the overwhelming odds of statistical laws and their probability” (Arendt, 1998, p. 178)....
[...]
34 citations
Cites background from "The Human Condition."
...In the background of this debate is an internal debate between neorepublicans and civic humanists (Arendt, 1990, 1998; Baron, 1966; Pocock, 2003)....
[...]
References
[...]
410 citations
271 citations
223 citations
215 citations
204 citations