The Human Condition.
Citations
18 citations
Cites background from "The Human Condition."
...Political discussion has been long considered an essential feature of democracy on the grounds of its obvious linkages with deliberation, negotiation, and group decision (Arendt, 1958)....
[...]
18 citations
18 citations
18 citations
Cites background from "The Human Condition."
...According to Arendt (1958a), a novel feature of the ‘modern world’ is the human capacity to not merely of act upon nature, but act into it....
[...]
...…well-known diagnoses; e.g. how totalitarian violence produced statelessness in ways that revealed ‘the right to have rights’, or how modern notions of political revolutions were distinct by virtue of instantiating new social orders rather than restoring old ones (Arendt, 1958b, 1963b, 1972, 1994)....
[...]
...By rethinking the function of things, Honig (2017: 34) makes the case that Arendt is a kind of ‘object-relations theorist’ who recognized the capacity of ‘things’ to stabilize the world. The troubling corollary, however, is that the novel capacity of atomic weapons meant some ‘things’ could destabilize – that is, end – the conditions by which any world is made permanent. Honig’s argument for the centrality of ‘things’ contrasts with Last’s (2017: 74) view that Arendt tolerates things, but generally ‘has a very negative attitude towards the encroachment of matter on human affairs’. There are reasons to follow Honig in this instance. First, as Hyv€ onen (2016: 545, original emphasis) shows, Arendt’s concern was with how the ‘thingly character of the world’ was under threat by accelerating material forces of science, technology and capital. Second, as Schmidt (2017) shows, Arendt’s attention to things offers a way to arrest the ‘naturalization of process’ in which non-human agency, such as that of water, has been manipulated to link geology and liberal governmentality in the Anthropocene. As discussed below, Arendt placed particular emphasis on how the materiality of the world is transformed by capitalist processes and, with it, the terms of political governance. Honig’s call to recognize the constitutive role of ‘things’ contrasts with political theorists who dismiss Arendt as irrelevant to understanding the political entanglements between human and non-human action. Bennett (2010: 34) criticizes Arendt for positioning humans as the ‘bearer of an exceptional kind of power’ that excludes non-human actions and their political implications. Connolly (2017) groups Arendt with other ‘sociocentric’ thinkers who disregard the intrusions of non-human processes and forces within and beyond human worlds....
[...]
...Critically, Arendt (1958a) argues that the Earth itself – planetary nature – cannot replace the lost objects that once provided permanence to the world owing to the capacity for action to render Earth itself impermanent....
[...]
...(Arendt, 1958a: 150) To grapple with human capacities that undercut the permanency of the Earth and of the ‘world’ presumed upon in the modern age, Arendt mobilized action as a field of possibility in which the political may be reconfigured with respect to novelty and process....
[...]
18 citations
Cites background from "The Human Condition."
...Arendt and the Greeks When turning to Greek city-states and Athens in particular, Arendt accentuates a particular experience (Arendt, 1998: 22-37)....
[...]
...Arendt’s concern, in other words, is less with the state and more with political action – the public sphere of action is being subsumed by private apolitical concerns (Arendt, 1998: 38-78; cf. also Oakeshott, 1991)....
[...]
...…in Arendt’s discussion over making (ποίησις) and acting (πρᾶξις): (1) “Before men began to act, a definite space had to be secured and a structure built where all subsequent actions could take place, the space being the public realm of the polis and its structure the law” (Arendt, 1998: 194-195)....
[...]
...But most concrete is the fear of a bureaucratic machinery, which, as argued in Chapter 5, quite literally results in “the rule of nobody” (Arendt, 1998: 45)....
[...]
...Labour is an activity in relation to toil; it has “an unequivocal connotation of pain and trouble” (Arendt, 1998: 80)....
[...]
References
[...]
410 citations
271 citations
223 citations
215 citations
204 citations