The Human Condition.
Citations
18 citations
17 citations
17 citations
Cites background from "The Human Condition."
...…as the motivational origin of capitalism, and to reinsert the adjective ‘public’, which had been a standard qualifier until the phrasing of the Declaration of Independence, into the ‘happiness’ that American citizens had claimed the private right to pursue (Arendt, 1958: 254, 1990: 127–9)....
[...]
...the phrasing of the Declaration of Independence, into the ‘happiness’ that American citizens had claimed the private right to pursue (Arendt, 1958: 254, 1990: 127–9). As Sennett, a former student of Arendt, defended the 18th-century understanding of the difference between public life on the one hand, and personal needs and self-identities on the other: ‘“Public” behaviour is a matter, first, of action at a distance from the self, from its immediate history, circumstances, and needs; second, this action involves the experiencing of diversity.’ The public sphere is ‘the forum in which it becomes meaningful to join with other persons without the compulsion to know them as persons’ (2002[1977]: 87, 340). The French social theorist André Gorz was also a long-running critic of productivism and a famous advocate of a ‘post-work’ society in which culture and politics are civilised and reinvigorated by an abundance of time. Less well known than his political writings is his intellectual self-portrait, The Traitor, which was first published in the same year as Arendt’s The Human Condition (1958). What makes The Traitor particularly relevant to this discussion is that it traces, in a uniquely personal way, the process by which the individual’s search for positive freedom, if it is to be at all successful, leads away from the self towards the world of others....
[...]
...the phrasing of the Declaration of Independence, into the ‘happiness’ that American citizens had claimed the private right to pursue (Arendt, 1958: 254, 1990: 127–9). As Sennett, a former student of Arendt, defended the 18th-century understanding of the difference between public life on the one hand, and personal needs and self-identities on the other: ‘“Public” behaviour is a matter, first, of action at a distance from the self, from its immediate history, circumstances, and needs; second, this action involves the experiencing of diversity.’ The public sphere is ‘the forum in which it becomes meaningful to join with other persons without the compulsion to know them as persons’ (2002[1977]: 87, 340)....
[...]
...Arendt, too, argued that in a conflictual world one cannot engage in political practice without taking sides, scorning those who believed abstract moral principles and appeals to human rights could answer, for example, the threat of Nazism. ‘If one is attacked as a Jew’, she said in an interview in 1964, ‘one must defend oneself as a Jew. Not as a German, not as a world-citizen, not as an upholder of the Rights of Man, or whatever. But: What can I specifically do as a Jew?’ (1994: 12). Both thinkers defended a notion of positive freedom that avoided moralising idealism – such as that which characterised the ‘new Liberalism’ that dominated late Victorian England under the influence of T.H. Green – as well as the false universalism that Berlin, and indeed Arendt (2002), believed had made Marx’s ideas susceptible to totalitarian use....
[...]
17 citations
17 citations
References
[...]
410 citations
271 citations
223 citations
215 citations
204 citations