Abstract: of a dissertation at the University of Miami. Dissertation supervised by Professor John W. Murphy Number of pages in text (175) This project, as a participatory-research endeavor, seeks to empower MuslimAmericans with a sense of place and voice in an environment that has been more conducive to denying both of these considerations. Previous research on Muslims has not dealt with them fairly, despite any good intentions that may have existed. The point of the PAR project is to gain access to the Muslim experience, rather than speaking for these persons. Rather than use their voice, be their voice, or to speak for Muslims, a participatory research project desires to: speak with Muslims, echo their experiences, coproduce knowledge, and leverage resources as a researcher that may advance community autonomy. The task in this project was to co-create a rendering of different Muslim experiences that has yet to exist. Turning towards Muslims as accomplices necessitated a turn away from the Western gaze that recognized Muslims as antithesis, as mission work, or as victims. An accomplice opens spaces and redirects resources to affirm diversity within a particular community. Together, as collaborators/accomplices/Muslims, we came to understand the meanings and concerns of this marginalized community. This dissertation, then, provides an insider’s account to the burdens, honors, and responsibilities of being a part of a “breaking” Muslim community in Miami. From looking Muslim and feeling the pressures of embodiment to the violence and empowerment realized through Muslim bodies, the struggle for meaning represented a struggle for survival and community, as much as a struggle of faith. When the committee examined the hundreds of pages amassed during the interview phase, five aspects of the community became evident: (1) locating community (2) relating the social to the Mosque, (3) breaking community, (4) structural violence, and (5) Muslim anomie. While the five phases captured dimensions of the Muslim community, most participants viewed the Mosque as the epicenter of Muslim activity. However, an important distinction was made between a Mosque rooted in homogeneity and exclusivity versus a Mosque as it ought to be. In the case of the latter, the Mosque represented an unfulfilled potential. That is, everything about being Muslim and a Muslim community represented an outgrowth that moved from an internalized actualization to an external materialization. To become Muslim was to be Muslim. To be Muslim was to become Muslim. In the case, of being rooted in homogeneity and exclusivity, boundaries between the Mosque and mainstream society became blurred. The paradox of this homogeneity is Muslim anomie. These findings emphasize the need for Muslims to re-connect and build trust with each other, as well as to the need to connect to non-Muslim communities. Muslims will need to work through differences to help salvage the potential of the greater community. Indeed, the commitment involved in bridging communities, with distinctive outlooks, is a challenge but necessary. Therefore, a five point-initiative for Muslims involved in the struggle for community is proposed. This plan serves more as a launching point for “dialogical action” than a blueprint for fixing a community in crises.