scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacotot/Rancière on Equality, Emancipation and Education

26 Jun 2014-Contemporary Education Dialogue (SAGE Publications)-Vol. 11, Iss: 2, pp 221-234
TL;DR: In this article, the authors find that when one looks for rigorous engagement with Ranciere's thoughts on education, one finds a relative indifference on the part of educationists, which is surprising given that "equality" as a concept has not only received focused attention from educationists for long, inviting reflections that have varied in their elaboration of the concept, but also has a specific import in current educational scenarios across the world, such that it has heightened the imperative to revisit this concept.
Abstract: Jacques Ranciere (born 1940), much like his contemporary Michel Foucault, has an academic oeuvre that defies neat classification within established disciplinary boundaries. This is due to the cross-disciplinary nature of his work, with a strong orientation towards history and philosophy. Although he trained as a philosopher (studying with Louis Althusser and contributing to the latter’s Reading Capital), Ranciere’s work has been more a series of explorations in the archives of subaltern workers of early nineteenth-century Europe. His work has received the attention of scholars from across a number of disciplines such as cultural studies, history, philosophy and political science. However, when one looks for rigorous engagement with Ranciere’s thoughts on education, one finds a relative indifference on the part of educationists. This is surprising given that ‘equality’ as a concept has not only received focused attention from educationists for long, inviting reflections that have varied in their elaboration of the concept, but also has a specific import in current educational scenarios across the world, such that it has heightened the imperative to revisit this concept.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
10 Aug 2012-City
TL;DR: The Rise of the Creative Class of 2002 ends with a clarion call for a post-industrial, post-class sensibility: "The task of building a truly creative society is not a game of solitaire This game, we play as a team" as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Richard Florida's Rise of the Creative Class of 2002 ends with a clarion call for a post-industrial, post-class sensibility: ‘The task of building a truly creative society is not a game of solitaire This game, we play as a team’ Florida's sentiment has been echoed across a broad and interdisciplinary literature in social theory and public policy, producing a new conventional wisdom: that class antagonisms are redundant in today's climate of competitive professionalism and a dominant creative mainstream Questions of social justice are thus deflected by reassurances that there is no ‘I’ in team, and that ‘we’ must always be defined by corporate membership rather than class-based solidarities The post-industrial city becomes a post-political city nurtured by efficient, market-oriented governance leavened with a generous dose of multicultural liberalism In this paper, we analyze how this Floridian fascination has spread into debates on contemporary urban social structure and neighbourhood change In part

66 citations


Cites background from "‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacoto..."

  • ...It signals to the fact that whilst occupational structures may have changed dramatically, there is little evidence to suggest that these can be read as a decline of (urban) social antagonisms (Rancière, 1991b)....

    [...]

  • ...Importantly, this means that capital is not simply mapped onto class relations (i.e. a classical Marxian framework) but rather existing social structures are imbued with antagonisms through the economy; is this not why Rancière (1991a, 1991b) continues to use the term ‘worker’ as opposed to labour?...

    [...]

01 Jan 2013
TL;DR: The field of critical management studies, regularly dated back to the publication of Mats Alvesson and Hugh Willmott's collection (1992), has drawn on left wing theoretical sources as well as heterodox empirical research in reflecting on and ultimately criticizing prevailing practices and discourses of management as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: While the inclusion of anarchism and management in the same sentence would normally connote a rejection of one and a corresponding defense of the other, the study of management and radical social and political thought are not as antithetical as one might at first imagine. The field of critical management studies, regularly dated back to the publication of Mats Alvesson and Hugh Willmott’s collection (1992), has drawn on left wing theoretical sources as well as heterodox empirical research in reflecting on and ultimately criticizing prevailing practices and discourses of management. As Gibson Burrell noted twenty years ago, there is a ‘growing number of alternative organisational forms now appearing, whether inspired by anarchism, syndicalism, the ecological movement, the co-operative movement, libertarian communism, self-help groups or, perhaps most importantly, by feminism’ (1992: 82). Despite anarchism appearing first in his list of inspirations for alternative organisation and having a history at least as old as Marxism and feminism, there has been relatively little research on anarchism and its principles within management studies. Notable exceptions include some works under the umbrella of critical management studies (Reedy, 2002;

65 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors argued that the presumed non-existence of Queer International Theory is an effect of how the discipline of International Relations combines homologization, figuration, and gentrification to code various types of theory as failures in order to manage the conduct of international theorizing in all its forms.
Abstract: Over the last decade, Queer Studies have become Global Queer Studies, generating significant insights into key international political processes. Yet, the transformation from Queer to Global Queer has left the discipline of International Relations largely unaffected, which begs the question: if Queer Studies has gone global, why has the discipline of International Relations not gone somewhat queer? Or, to put it in Martin Wight’s provocative terms, why is there no Queer International Theory? This article claims that the presumed non-existence of Queer International Theory is an effect of how the discipline of International Relations combines homologization, figuration, and gentrification to code various types of theory as failures in order to manage the conduct of international theorizing in all its forms. This means there are generalizable lessons to be drawn from how the discipline categorizes Queer International Theory out of existence to bring a specific understanding of International Relations into existence.

50 citations


Cites background from "‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacoto..."

  • ...By displacing ‘real stupidity’ for ‘figural stupidity,’ queer failure exposes ‘the limits of certain forms of knowing and certain ways of inhabiting structures of knowing’ (Halberstam, 2011: 11–12; see also Ranciere, 1991)....

    [...]

DissertationDOI
30 Jun 2018
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a new materialist reading of studio art practice to explore the transformative potentials of matter: specifically, how, by giving greater agency to materials, matter takes on a pedagogical role.
Abstract: The growing conceptual turn in UK tertiary-level art education has led to the increasing dematerialisation of the studio as a site for learning. This practice-based research responds to this context and advocates the primacy of the studio as a space for embodied experimentation. In contrast to the representational analyses prevalent in art historical discourse, I propose a new materialist reading of studio art practice to explore the transformative potentials of matter: specifically, how, by giving greater agency to materials, matter takes on a pedagogical role. Drawing on the work of Deleuze, Haraway, Barad and Hayles, I consider the prosthetic nature of art practice, and focus on the fluid boundaries of the artist-learner in the making process. I delineate how material agency operates within artistic assemblages to extend learner subjectivity, and suggest that the artist-learner experiences themselves as ‘other’ through affective intensities that traverse bodies in the artistic assemblage (both human and non-human). These encounters produce immanent learning experiences, as normative perceptions are challenged and new orientations affected. Artist-learners are therefore not discrete but entangled entities, and art practice, as a form of posthuman pedagogy, generates thought that is not exclusively human. This research offers a critical reappraisal of learning in a broader non-human context, where the non-human focus of this research considers how the materiality of learning becomes a core part of what is learnt and how the body becomes. The practices that I investigate can be understood as Critical Pedagogies, as they embrace embodied experience as a vital dimension of the learning process and bridge the gap between producers and consumers of knowledge. This investigation contributes to a field of research that aims to theorise more affective learning practices, and to critical discourse that focuses on the intra-action of cultural studies, art practice and education.

24 citations


Cites background or methods from "‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacoto..."

  • ...This form of learning within studio-based art practice can be elucidated by Rancière’s (1991) story of ‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’. Rancière (1991) recounts the story of Joseph Jacotot, a schoolteacher driven into exile during the Restoration who devised a method for showing illiterate parents how they could teach their children to read....

    [...]

  • ...In ‘The Emancipated Spectator’ Rancière (2009) argues against art as spectacle, and...

    [...]

  • ...This form of learning within studio-based art practice can be elucidated by Rancière’s (1991) story of ‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’....

    [...]

  • ...Rancière (2009) celebrates artistic practices which move viewers from spectators to agents....

    [...]

  • ...affirmation was that anyone can learn alone, and the politics of Rancière’s (1991) story...

    [...]

MonographDOI
19 Jun 2019
TL;DR: The poetics of clarity in contemporary academic writing is examined in this paper by examining the ideal of clarity beyond its apparently self-evident value, revealing a positivist bias and a regime of high-speed consumption that characterises what, in certain regards, might be considered a productive space for knowledge production.
Abstract: Across disciplinary borders, clarity is taken for granted as a cardinal virtue of communication in contemporary academia. But what is clarity, how is it practised in writing across disciplinary borders and how does it affect our ways of researching and thinking? This book explores such questions by scrutinising the ideal of clarity beyond its apparently self-evident value. Through a multi-methodological empirical analysis of the ideal of clarity, the author offers a sketch of what is termed ‘the poetics of clarity’, which is unfolded as a field of tension with important implications for sentence formation, authorial positioning and textual organisation. By way of a series of reflections on the possible consequences of this for thinking, this volume also explores the parts of knowledge production that may be marginalised, especially poetic language use, biases, interests and contexts, multi-dimensional arguments and errors. Revealing a positivist bias and a regime of high-speed consumption that characterise what, in certain regards, might be considered a productive space for knowledge production, Writing and Thinking in Contemporary Academia will appeal to scholars with interests in the sociology of knowledge, continental philosophy, the philosophy of science and academic writing.

23 citations

References
More filters
Book
01 Jan 1991
TL;DR: Translator's introduction 1. An intellectual adventure 2. The ignorant one's lesson 3. Reason between equals 4. The society of contempt 5. The emancipator and his monkey Notes as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Translator's introduction 1. An intellectual adventure 2. The ignorant one's lesson 3. Reason between equals 4. The society of contempt 5. The emancipator and his monkey Notes.

922 citations


"‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacoto..." refers background or result in this paper

  • ...…‘incapacity’ on which explication is Contemporary Education Dialogue, 11, 2 (2014): 221–234 based ‘provides the structuring fiction of the explicative conception of the world … [t]o explain something to someone is first of all to show him he cannot understand it by himself’ (Rancière, 1991, p. 6)....

    [...]

  • ...…of accountability mechanisms and outcome-oriented learning through standardised assessment tests, Rancière’s recovery of ‘equality’ as ‘not an end to attain, but (as) a point of departure, a supposition to maintain in every circumstance’ (Rancière, 1991, p. 138) inverts the dominant discourse....

    [...]

  • ...(Rancière, 1991, pp. 45–46) A better understanding of the performative effects of different presuppositions about the equality of intelligences can be gained if we juxtapose Rancière’s work with that of one of his contemporaries, Pierre Bourdieu....

    [...]

  • ...…to Rancière, punctuates the beginning of the ‘progress towards stultification’, for ‘the child who is explained to will devote his intelligence to the work of grieving: to understanding, that is to say, to understanding that he doesn’t understand unless he is explained to’ (Rancière, 1991, p. 8)....

    [...]

  • ...And so on, to infinity’ (Rancière, 1991, p. 23)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of the relevance of Ranciere's work to education research can be found in this paper, where parallels are drawn between the relationship between discourse and subjection and their attention to discursive imitation in making inequality representable.
Abstract: Jacques Ranciere’s work has had significant impact in philosophy and literary theory, but remains largely undiscussed in the field of education. This article is a review of the relevance of Ranciere’s work to education research. Ranciere’s argument about education emerges from his critique of Bourdieu, which states that Bourdieu reinforces inequality by presuming it as the starting point of his analysis. What is at stake is the question of performativity, and the means by which discourse has effects. This debate has implications for considering the basis of claims to truth in literary and social science discourse. Parallels are drawn between Judith Butler’s and Ranciere’s portrayal of the relationship between discourse and subjection, as well as their attention to discursive ‘imitation’ in making inequality representable. The article concludes with a discussion of the problematic which Ranciere’s work suggests for education research. Amended

74 citations


"‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacoto..." refers background in this paper

  • ...As Pelletier (2009) observes: Equality is instantiated in the telling itself....

    [...]

  • ...What Rancière discerns in Bourdieu’s work is a performative gesture of ‘progress’ that makes inequality axiomatic—a self-evident truth (Pelletier, 2009)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Galloway as discussed by the authors considers emancipation as a purpose for education through examining the theories of Paulo Freire and Jacques Ranciere, and argues that the possibility for an emancipatory education cannot be ignored if education is to be considered as more than merely a process of passing down the skills and knowledge necessary in order to socialize people into current society.
Abstract: In this essay Sarah Galloway considers emancipation as a purpose for education through examining the theories of Paulo Freire and Jacques Ranciere. Both theorists are concerned with the prospect of distinguishing between education that might socialize people into what is taken to be an inherently oppressive society and education with emancipation as its purpose. Galloway reconstructs the theories in parallel, examining the assumptions made, the processes of oppression described, and the movements to emancipation depicted. In so doing, she argues that that the two theorists hold a common model for theorizing oppression and emancipation as educational processes, distinguished by the differing assumptions they each make about humanity, but that their theories ultimately have opposing implications for educational practices. Galloway further maintains that Freire and Ranciere raise similar educational problems and concerns, both theorizing that the character of the relations among teachers, students, and educational materials is crucial to an emancipatory education. Galloway's approach allows discussion of some of the criticisms that have been raised historically about Freire's theory and how these might be addressed to some degree by Ranciere's work. Taking the two theories together, she argues that the possibility for an emancipatory education cannot be ignored if education is to be considered as more than merely a process of passing down the skills and knowledge necessary in order to socialize people into current society.

63 citations


"‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacoto..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Both regard education as being inherently oppressive, but also as containing possibilities of emancipation that are not dependent on an unequal relationship of intelligences where teachers reveal the ‘actual’ nature of social oppression to learners (Galloway, 2012)....

    [...]

  • ...…Education Dialogue, 11, 2 (2014): 221–234 and the process by which ‘[t]he relation of will against will is strengthened in order to weaken the relation of intelligence to intelligence, where the will of the teacher drives the will of the student toward intellectual acts’ (Galloway, 2012, p. 176)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In the fall of 1986, a proposed law regarding the French university system caused over 300,000 students to take to the streets demanding equality as mentioned in this paper, which was a relatively lukewarm modification designed to adapt the university to pressing economic realities; according to government statistics, one in three graduates was unemployed.
Abstract: In the fall of 1986 a proposed law regarding the French university system caused over 300,000 students to take to the streets demanding equality. The law was a relatively lukewarm modification designed to adapt the university to pressing economic realities; according to government statistics, one in three graduates was unemployed. It proposed a modest increase in fees and what was called "selective orientation": a means of

41 citations


"‘The Ignorant Schoolmaster’: Jacoto..." refers background in this paper

  • ...—which is to say, the question of equality’ (Ross, 1991, p. 58)....

    [...]

  • ...(Ross, 1991, p. 69) ‘Extract 1’ Chapter 1: An Intellectual Adventure (Rancière, 1991) In 1818, Joseph Jacotot, a lecturer in French literature at the University of Louvain, had an intellectual adventure....

    [...]

  • ...…they are excluded is a structural effect produced by the very existence of the system that excludes them (La Reproduction) (Rancière, 1984, cited in Ross, 1991, p. 61).1 Contemporary Education Dialogue, 11, 2 (2014): 221–234 The logic of reproduction, according to Rancière, is only a means of…...

    [...]

Trending Questions (1)
What are some of the key concepts in Ranciere's work that have been taken up by urban scholars?

The text does not provide information about key concepts in Ranciere's work that have been taken up by urban scholars.