scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

The Implementation of European Union Law by Member States Under Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, it is argued that this minimalist approach simply begs the question of whether or not EU law applies in any specific case, a gateway question that the Court of Justice has been historically ill-equipped to answer.
Abstract
The precise scope of application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is, in many respects, still uncharted. In particular, it remains largely unclear to which national measures the Charter applies. The relevant instruction contained in art. 51(1), referring to the elusive concept of the “implementation of EU law,” has so far resisted all hermeneutic efforts. As a result, it is difficult to predict whether or not a domestic measure that has legal effects touching upon the sphere of matters regulated by EU law, but that was not adopted to implement EU law directly, will be bound by the Charter. This article traces this state of legal uncertainty to the ambiguous case law of the Court of Justice, which has hesitantly confirmed case law on the application of fundamental rights to national measures as general principles of EU law, and, lately, has sought refuge in the equivalence between the application of the Charter and the application of EU law at large (Fransson, Texdata). It is argued that this minimalist approach simply begs the question of whether or not EU law applies in any specific case, a gateway question that the Court of Justice has been historically ill-equipped to answer. This congenital difficulty has carried over in the interpretation of art. 51(1) of the Charter, and has, so far, left national judges without guidance, an undesirable result for the consistent application of fundamental rights across the Union and its Member States. The analysis is updated as of the Siragusa order of March 2014, which seems to call into question the Fransson precedent, and proposes a new composite test, inspired by several cases of the 1990s.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Intra-EU Bilateral Investment Treaties and EU Law after Achmea: 'Know Well What Leads You Forward and What Holds You Back'

TL;DR: In this article, the compatibility of intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (intra-EU BITs) with EU law is analyzed, and it is shown that BITs accelerate the internal market and their suppression does not lead the European integration further, but holds it back.
Dissertation

EU citizenship as a means of reinforcing the application of EU fundamental rights: challenges, developments and limits

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a case study to assess the modern "triangular" protection of rights and stimulate the interest in assessing new legal paths to reinforce it, by broadening fundamental rights' scope of application.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Right to Liberty in European Union Law and Mutual Recognition in Criminal Matters

TL;DR: In this article, the interaction between the application of mutual recognition in criminal matters and the right to liberty is analyzed, and four mutual recognition instruments are analysed in light of the right-to- liberty: the Framework Decisions on the European Arrest Warrant, the Transfer of Prisoners, the Probation Measures, and the European Supervision Order (ESO).
Journal ArticleDOI

Intra-EU Bilateral Investment Treaties and EU Law After Achmea: “Know Well What Leads You Forward and What Holds You Back”

TL;DR: In this article, the compatibility of intra-EU bilateral investment treaties (intra-EU BITs) with EU law is analyzed, and a positivist and a critical assessment of the Achmea ruling is given.
Journal ArticleDOI

Another brick in the whole: the case-law of the court of justice on free movement and its possible impact on european criminal law

TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight the impact that principles established in the context of the fundamental freedoms can have on EU criminal law and highlight the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
Related Papers (5)