The implication of elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level in pleural fluid of patients with non-malignant pleural effusion.
TL;DR: The aim of this study was to evaluate the false positive rate for pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in non‐malignant pleural effusions and to determine whether the falsely elevated CEA level has any relation to other biochemical parameters of pleural Effusions.
Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the false positive rate for pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in non-malignant pleural effusions and to determine whether the falsely elevated CEA level has any relation to other biochemical parameters of pleural effusions.
Methodology: We performed a retrospective analysis of 654 consecutive patients with a pleural effusion admitted to the pulmonary department of a tertiary referral teaching hospital from March 1997 to March 1999. The aetiology of the pleural effusions were classified as tuberculosis (n = 262), malignancy (n = 204), pneumonia (n = 145), exudates of other origin (n = 28) and transudate (n = 1).
Results: A false positive result for pleural fluid CEA level (> 5 ng/mL) was registered in 13.8% of non-malignant pleural effusion cases: empyema (38.6%), parapneumonic effusion (14.7%), exudates of other origin (14.3%), tuberculosis (7.3%) and transudate (6.7%). In analysis of the subgroup with false positive results for pleural fluid CEA level, the CEA level of non-malignant pleural effusion showed a significant relationship to the severity of pleural inflammation in terms of the following variables: LDH (rs = 0.4201, P= 0.001), adenosine deaminase (ADA) (rs = 0.4440, P= 0.0004), white blood cell count (rs = 0.4266, P= 0.0004), polymorphonuclear cell percentage (rs = 0.5080, P= 0.0001), and polymorphonuclear cell count (rs = 0.5095, P= 0.0002). In the parapneumonic effusion and empyema groups, the changes in pleural fluid CEA level exhibited a positive association with the changes in the pleural fluid ADA level (rs = 0.8143, P= 0.0002).
Conclusions: The results from our series indicated that false positive results for pleural fluid CEA level were most commonly observed in patients with empyema and parapneumonic effusion and the CEA level showed a significant correlation to the indices of pleural inflammation. The serial measurement of pleural fluid CEA level may be useful as a means of monitoring resolution of pleural inflammation and excluding the possibility of a malignant pleural effusion.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: The presence of considerable concentrations of AFP, hCG, CEA, CA125, SCC, MCA, TPS, CA 19-9, and PSA in AF during pregnancy may be attributed to their involvement in biological functions associated with fetal development, differentiation, and maturation.
Abstract: Proteins that are expressed by both malignant and healthy fetal tissues are recognized as oncofetal. These antigens are associated with cell proliferation and differentiation and are produced in high concentrations in pregnancy and malignancy. Their biological role in malignancy is the suppression of the host's immune system, while in pregnancy they affect the maternal immune response, generating maternal tolerance toward the embryo. This review describes the levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in maternal serum (MS), umbilical cord serum (UC), and amniotic fluid (AF) and outlines their roles in the assessment of pregnancy and malignancy. All antigens studied, except CA 15-3, are on...
131 citations
TL;DR: The present meta‐analysis determined the accuracy of CEA measurement in the diagnosis of MPE.
Abstract: Background and objective: Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Many studies have investigated the utility of pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the early diagnosis of MPE. The present meta-analysis determined the accuracy of CEA measurement in the diagnosis of MPE.
Methods: A systematic review of English language studies was conducted and data on the accuracy of pleural CEA concentrations in the diagnosis of MPE were pooled using random effects models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize the overall test performance.
Results: Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The summary estimates for CEA in the diagnosis of MPE were: sensitivity 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52–0.55), specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93–0.95), positive likelihood ratio 9.52 (95% CI: 6.97–13.01), negative likelihood ratio 0.49 (95% CI: 0.44–0.54) and diagnostic odds ratio 22.5 (95% CI: 15.6–32.5). Analysis of a subset of 11 studies which examined the value of pleural CEA in ruling out a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma found that the sensitivity and specificity of a CEA level exceeding cut-off values were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93–0.99) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.55–0.65), respectively.
Conclusions: Measurement of pleural CEA is likely to be a useful diagnostic tool for confirming MPE, and is also helpful in the differential diagnosis between malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic lung cancer. The results of CEA assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings and the results of conventional tests.
87 citations
TL;DR: The highest sensitivity was obtained with a combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA15-3 and CEA in pleural fluid, and the highest specificity was obtained in combination with combination ofCA 15-2 in serum and neuron-specific enolase in Pleural fluid.
Abstract: In order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of tumor markers in differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions, we carried out a prospective study in a group of Iranian people. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) were assayed prospectively in patients with pleural effusion (40 malignant and 37 benign). The highest sensitivity was obtained with a combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3 and CEA in pleural fluid (80%), also with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3, NSE and CEA in pleural fluid (80%). The highest specificity was obtained with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3 and NSE in pleural fluid (100%), and also with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3, NSE and CEA in pleural fluid (100%). (Pathology Oncology Research Vol 11, No 4, 236–241)
31 citations
TL;DR: Measurement of CEA and CA19-9 in pleural fluid complements cytology and other classifying tests and performance is specifically enhanced in effusions caused by malignancies known to secrete CEA or CA 19-9, and their use should be tailored to patients suspected of having thosemalignancies.
29 citations
TL;DR: The use of CYFRA 21-1 and/or CEA in addition to pericardial fluid cytology for the recognition of malignant pericARDial effusion is strongly recommended.
Abstract: A positive cytology result in pericardial fluid is the gold standard for recognition of malignant pericardial effusion. Unfortunately, in 30-50% of patients with malignant pericardial effusion cytological examination of the pericardial fluid is negative. Tumor marker assessment in pericardial fluid may help to recognize malignant pericardial effusion. The aim of our study was to estimate the value of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA measurement in pericardial fluid for the recognition of malignant pericardial effusion. To our knowledge this is the first study on CYFRA 21-1 assessment in pericardial effusion. The examined group consisted of 50 patients with malignant pericardial effusion and 34 patients with non-malignant pericardial effusion. Median CEA concentrations in malignant pericardial effusion and non-malignant pericardial effusion were 80 ng/mL (0-317) and 0.5 ng/mL (0-18.4), respectively (p 100 ng/mL or CEA >5 ng/mL were found in 14/15 patients with malignant pericardial effusion and negative pericardial fluid cytology. We therefore strongly recommend the use of CYFRA 21-1 and/or CEA in addition to pericardial fluid cytology for the recognition of malignant pericardial effusion. (Int J Biol Markers 2005; 20: 43-49).
23 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: It is concluded that patients with an undiagnosed pleural effusion should be evaluated in an individualized stepwise manner and if malignancy is strongly considered, the initial three steps should be relatively noninvasive and include clinical evaluation and cytologic study.
145 citations
TL;DR: Tumor markers are not suitable for the differential diagnosis of malignancy while the combination of CEA with other tumor markers increased sensitivity but decreased specificity.
116 citations
TL;DR: The results of a study of CYFRA 21‐1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125, squamous cell antigen (SCC), and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions of diverse etiologies are reported.
Abstract: BACKGROUND
To the authors' knowledge the role of tumor marker determination in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions has not been established definitively. The current article reports the results of a study of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell antigen (SCC), and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions of diverse etiologies.
METHODS
One hundred forty-six patients with pleural effusions (43 malignant, 47 tuberculous, 32 miscellaneous benign, and 24 paramalignant) were studied prospectively. Levels of CYFRA 21-1, CA 125, CEA, NSE, and SCC were measured by radioimmunoassay in the pleural fluid in all patients and in the serum in 118 patients.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences between the serum and pleural fluid levels of tumor markers with the exception of CA 125, which was higher in the pleural fluid. With maximum specificity, the highest sensitivity in the diagnosis of pleural malignancy was obtained with a combination of CYFRA 21-1 (with a cutoff value of 150 U/L), CEA (with a cutoff value of 40 ng/mL), and CA 125 (with a cutoff value of 1000 ng/mL) in pleural fluid. NSE and SCC added no diagnostic value. The simultaneous use of tumor markers and cytology in pleural fluid increased the sensitivity from 55.8% to 81%.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that a combination of CYFRA 21-1, CEA, and CA 125 in the pleural fluid can be a useful addition to pleural cytology in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion. Cancer 1999;86:1488–95. © 1999 American Cancer Society.
103 citations
TL;DR: Combined assays of CEA, CA 19-9, and ADA may be useful in distinguishing pleural effusions due to malignancies from those of tuberculous origin.
91 citations
TL;DR: Their sensitivity and their complementarity, CEA, CA 15–3, CYFRA 21–1, NSE and SCC appear to be very useful to improve the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.
Abstract: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigens 15-3, 19-9 and 72-4 (CA 15-3, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4), cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) were evaluated in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of malignant effusions. With a specificity of 99%, determined in a series of 121 benign effusions, the best individual diagnostic sensitivities in the whole series of 215 malignant effusions or in the subgroup of adenocarcinomas were observed with CEA, CA 15-3 and CA 72-4. As expected, a high sensitivity was obtained with SCC in squamous cell carcinomas and with NSE in small-cell lung carcinomas. CYFRA and/or CA 15-3 were frequently increased in mesotheliomas. Discriminant analysis showed that the optimal combination for diagnosis of non-lymphomatous malignant effusions was CEA + CA 15-3 + CYFRA + NSE: sensitivity of 94.4% with an overall specificity of 95%. In malignant effusions with a negative cytology, 83.9% were diagnosed using this association. The association CYFRA + NSE + SCC was able to discriminate adenocarcinomas from small-cell lung cancers. Regarding their sensitivity and their complementarity, CEA, CA 15-3, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and SCC appear to be very useful to improve the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.
86 citations