The influence of food supply on foraging behaviour in a desert spider
TL;DR: It is suggested that digestive constraints prevented supplemented spiders from fully utilizing the available prey, and by reducing foraging activities on the surface, spiders in a prey-rich habitat can reduce the risk of predation.
Abstract: We tested the alternative hypotheses that foraging effort will increase (energy maximizer model) or decrease (due to increased costs or risks) when food supply increased, using a Namib desert burrowing spider, Seothyra henscheli (Eresidae), which feeds mainly on ants. The web of S. henscheli has a simple geometrical configuration, comprising a horizontal mat on the sand surface, with a variable number of lobes lined with sticky silk. The sticky silk is renewed daily after being covered by wind-blown sand. In a field experiment, we supplemented the spiders' natural prey with one ant on each day that spiders had active webs and determined the response to an increase in prey. We compared the foraging activity and web geometry of prey-supplemented spiders to non-supplemented controls. We compared the same parameters in fooddeprived and supplemented spiders in captivity. The results support the "costs of foraging" hypothesis. Supplemented spiders reduced their foraging activity and web dimensions. They moulted at least once and grew rapidly, more than doubling their mass in 6 weeks. By contrast, food-deprived spiders increased foraging effort by enlarging the diameter of the capture web. We suggest that digestive constraints prevented supplemented spiders from fully utilizing the available prey. By reducing foraging activities on the surface, spiders in a prey-rich habitat can reduce the risk of predation. However, early maturation resulting from a higher growth rate provides no advantage to S. henscheli owing to the fact that the timing of mating and dispersal are fixed by climatic factors (wind and temperature). Instead, large female body size will increase fitness by increasing the investiment in young during the period of extended maternal care.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: This review first briefly treats the different types of spider cannibalism and then focuses in more depth on evidence relating cannibalism to population dynamics and food web interactions to address the following questions.
Abstract: Cannibalism among generalist predators has implications for the dynamics of terrestrial food webs. Spiders are common, ubiquitous arthropod generalist predators in most natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Thus, the relationship of spider cannibalism to food limitation, competition, and population regulation has direct bearing on basic ecological theory and applications such as biological control. This review first briefly treats the different types of spider cannibalism and then focuses in more depth on evidence relating cannibalism to population dynamics and food web interactions to address the following questions: Is cannibalism in spiders a foraging strategy that helps to overcome the effects of a limited supply of calories and/or nutrients? Does cannibalism in spiders reduce competition for prey? Is cannibalism a significant density-dependent factor in spider population dynamics? Does cannibalism dampen spider-initiated trophic cascades?
321 citations
TL;DR: The presented estimates of the global annual prey kill and the relative contribution of spider predation in different biomes improve the general understanding of spider ecology and provide a first assessment of theglobal impact of this very important predator group.
Abstract: Spiders have been suspected to be one of the most important groups of natural enemies of insects worldwide. To document the impact of the global spider community as insect predators, we present estimates of the biomass of annually killed insect prey. Our estimates assessed with two different methods suggest that the annual prey kill of the global spider community is in the range of 400–800 million metric tons (fresh weight), with insects and collembolans composing >90% of the captured prey. This equals approximately 1‰ of the global terrestrial net primary production. Spiders associated with forests and grasslands account for >95% of the annual prey kill of the global spider community, whereas spiders in other habitats are rather insignificant contributors over a full year. The spider communities associated with annual crops contribute less than 2% to the global annual prey kill. This, however, can be partly explained by the fact that annual crop fields are “disturbed habitats” with a low buildup of spider biomass and that agrobiont spiders often only kill prey over short time periods in a year. Our estimates are supported by the published results of exclusion experiments, showing that the number of herbivorous/detritivorous insects and collembolans increased significantly after spider removal from experimental plots. The presented estimates of the global annual prey kill and the relative contribution of spider predation in different biomes improve the general understanding of spider ecology and provide a first assessment of the global impact of this very important predator group.
214 citations
Cites background or methods from "The influence of food supply on for..."
...Due to adverse environmental conditions, prey availability in deserts is very low and these biomes are often populated by spiders in very low densities (Shook 1978; Polis 1991; Lubin and Henschel 1996; Henschel 1997)....
[...]
...In the case of desert spiders, a daily food ingestion rate of 0.01–0.04 mg per milligram spider body mass was used (see Lubin and Henschel 1996; Henschel 1997)....
[...]
TL;DR: Evidence is provided that the behaviour of trap‐building predators is not stereotypic or fixed as was once commonly accepted, rather it can vary greatly, depending on the individual's internal state and its interactions with external environmental factors.
Abstract: Foraging theory was first developed to predict the behaviour of widely-foraging animals that actively search for prey. Although the behaviour of sit-and-wait predators often follows predictions derived from foraging theory, the similarity between these two distinct groups of predators is not always obvious. In this review, we compare foraging activities of trap-building predators (mainly pit-building antlions and web-building spiders), a specific group of sit-and-wait predators that construct traps as a foraging device, with those of widely-foraging predators. We refer to modifications of the trap characteristics as analogous to changes in foraging intensity. Our review illustrates that the responses of trap-building and widely-foraging predators to different internal and external factors, such as hunger level, conspecific density and predation threat are quite similar, calling for additional studies of foraging theory using trap-building predators. In each chapter of this review, we summarize the response of trap-building predators to a different factor, while contrasting it with the equivalent response characterizing widely-foraging predators. We provide here evidence that the behaviour of trap-building predators is not stereotypic or fixed as was once commonly accepted, rather it can vary greatly, depending on the individual's internal state and its interactions with external environmental factors.
143 citations
Cites background from "The influence of food supply on for..."
...Indeed, hungry spiders and antlions were often documented to increase the investment in trap size (Riechert, 1981; Sherman, 1994; Lubin & Henschel, 1996; Herberstein et al., 2000b; Arnett & Gotelli, 2001; Lomascolo & Farji-Brener, 2001)....
[...]
TL;DR: Experienced web-building spiders constructed more asymmetric webs than conspecifics deprived of any prior building experience over a period of several months, revealing that experience can contribute to intraspecific as well as to individual variations in web design.
Abstract: A typical feature of vertical orb-webs is the ‘top/bottom’ asymmetry, where the lower web region is larger than the upper web region. This asymmetry may improve prey capture success, because, sitting in the hub of the web, a spider can reach prey entangled below the hub faster than prey entangled in the area above the hub. While web asymmetry is known to vary intraspecifically, we tested if this variation also exists at the individual level and whether it is the result of experience, using two orb-web spider species, Argiope keyserlingi and Larinioides sclopetarius. The results reveal that experienced web-building spiders constructed more asymmetric webs than conspecifics deprived of any prior building experience over a period of several months. Experienced individuals invested more silk material into the web region below the hub, which covered a larger area. Moreover, web asymmetry was also influenced by previous prey capture experiences, as spiders increased the lower region of the web if it intercepted the most prey over a period of 6 days. Consequently, spiders may be able to use long-term web-building experience as well as short-term prey capture experience to build better traps. In contrast to previous views of spiders, experience can contribute to intraspecific as well as to individual variations in web design.
99 citations
References
More filters
74 citations
"The influence of food supply on for..." refers background in this paper
...Some field studies indicate that spiders invest less in construction, maintenance or defence of webs in prey-rich habitats than in poor ones (Riechert 1981; Pasquet 1984; Higgins and Buskirk 1992; Pasquet et al. 1994; Sherman 1994)....
[...]
TL;DR: Analysis of orb webs of the garden cross spider (Araneus diadematus) showed that these vertical webs have a significant up/down asymmetry; experiments demonstrated that the spider runs down faster than up, and thus confers a relatively higher foraging value to sections below the hub.
Abstract: © 1994 International Society for Behavioral Ecology Analysis of orb webs of the garden cross spider (Araneus diadematus) showed that these vertical webs have a significant up/down asymmetry. Experiments demonstrated that the spider runs down faster than up, and thus confers a relatively higher foraging value to sections below the hub. Simulations suggested that the density of capture spiral spacing, prey size, and the density of prey should all affect the capture efficiency of a web. Webs lose effective capture area because of overlap of the capture zone around each thread; the smaller the prey, the finer the mesh can be without losing effective area. Lower sectors of the web have a particular mesh size (height and length of capture spiral segments) throughout, whereas in the upper sectors the mesh size changes, widening from the hub towards the periphery.
72 citations
TL;DR: A simple model for the decision of when to leave a foraging site in a variable environment for a predator that does not deplete its local resources is proposed.
60 citations
TL;DR: Almost 70% of the prey of adult females of Pardosa amentata consists of Diptera, and during warm sunny days adult females feed more actively in the morning than in the afternoon.
Abstract: Almost 70% of the prey of adult females of Pardosa amentata consists of Diptera. During warm sunny days adult females feed more actively in the morning than in the afternoon. The duration of feeding is directly proportional to the weight of the prey. Adult females, on warm sunny days, kill, on average, just over one prey organism (approximately 3.5 mg live weight) per day.
60 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the structure of the web and examine the influence of certain environmental factors on web design and spider activity, including wind-blown sand covering the web's capture elements and disrupting foraging activity.
54 citations